Search Results

1. Gupta v Accident Compensation Corporation (Late Filing to the District Court) [2023] NZACC 140 [pdf, 257 KB]

   ...economic, social and personal costs of the impact of injury on the community. Unnecessary delay in bringing an appeal to the Accident Compensation appeals jurisdiction of the District Court carries potential costs for the appellant and also for the justice system and those involved in it. 3 [8] In Avery v No 2 Public Service Appeal Board,1 Richmond J (for the Court of Appeal) stated: When once an appellant allows the time for appealing to go by then his position suffers a r...

2. Cooper v Accident Compensation Corporation (Late filing to the District Court) [2023] NZACC 120 [pdf, 157 KB]

   ...scheme is minimising the economic, social and personal costs of the impact of injury on the community. Unnecessary delay in bringing an appeal to the ACC jurisdiction of the District Court carries potential costs for the appellant and also for the justice system and those involved in it. [7] In Avery v No 2 Public Service Appeal Board,1 Richmond J (for the Court of Appeal) stated: When once an appellant allows the time for appealing to go by then his position suffers a radical ch...

3. Evans v Accident Compensation Corporation (Late filing of an appeal to the District Court) [2024] NZACC 38 [pdf, 215 KB]

   ...scheme is minimising the economic, social and personal costs of the impact of injury on the community. Unnecessary delay in bringing an appeal to the ACC jurisdiction of the District Court carries potential costs for the appellant and also for the justice system and those involved in it. 3 [6] In Avery v No 2 Public Service Appeal Board,1 Richmond J (for the Court of Appeal) stated: When once an appellant allows the time for appealing to go by then his position suffers a radi...

4. Vine v Accident Compensation Corporation (Late filing to the District Court) [2023] NZACC 156 [pdf, 214 KB]

   ...scheme is minimising the economic, social and personal costs of the impact of injury on the community. Unnecessary delay in bringing an appeal to the ACC jurisdiction of the District Court carries potential costs for the appellant and also for the justice system and those involved in it. 3 [8] In Avery v No 2 Public Service Appeal Board,1 Richmond J (for the Court of Appeal) stated: When once an appellant allows the time for appealing to go by then his position suffers a radi...

5. Jones v Accident Compensation Corporation (Late filing to the District Court) [2025] NZACC 29 (20 February 2025) [pdf, 149 KB]

   ...minimising the economic, social and personal costs of the impact of injury on the community. Unnecessary delay in 3 bringing an appeal to the ACC jurisdiction of the District Court carries potential costs for the appellant and also for the justice system and those involved in it. [7] In Avery v No 2 Public Service Appeal Board,1 Richmond J (for the Court of Appeal) stated: When once an appellant allows the time for appealing to go by then his position suffers a radical chang...

6. Armstrong v Accident Compensation Corporation (Late filing to the District Court) [2025] NZACC 59 (8 April 2025) [pdf, 149 KB]

   ...scheme is minimising the economic, social and personal costs of the impact of injury on the community. Unnecessary delay in bringing an appeal to the ACC jurisdiction of the District Court carries potential costs for the appellant and also for the justice system and those involved in it. 3 [7] In Avery v No 2 Public Service Appeal Board,1 Richmond J (for the Court of Appeal) stated: When once an appellant allows the time for appealing to go by then his position suffers a rad...

7. Smith v Accident Compensation Corporation (Late filing to the District Court) [2025] NZACC 1 (6 January 2025) [pdf, 148 KB]

   ...scheme is minimising the economic, social and personal costs of the impact of injury on the community. Unnecessary delay in bringing an appeal to the ACC jurisdiction of the District Court carries potential costs for the appellant and also for the justice system and those involved in it. 3 [7] In Avery v No 2 Public Service Appeal Board,1 Richmond J (for the Court of Appeal) stated: When once an appellant allows the time for appealing to go by then his position suffers a rad...

8. WHT Annual Report 2024 [pdf, 271 KB]

   Annual Report of the WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL For the 12 months ended 30 June 2024 Presented to the Minister of Justice and the Minister of Housing 1 WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL OVERVIEW It is my pleasure as the Chair to present the Annual Report of the Tribunal for the period commencing 1 July 2023 and ending on 30 June 2024. The Tribunal is a well performing judicial body producing high quality and timely dec...

9. [2013] NZEmpC 29 Brightwater Engineers Ltd v Arrowsmith [pdf, 121 KB]

   ...work and that to return to Nelson to give evidence would be a hardship to him. In addition, it would undoubtedly be a considerable imposition on all of the respondents if they had to go through the process of a Court hearing. [37] These are all matters which the respondents could not avoid if the applicant had commenced its challenge within time and are not matters which have arisen during the period of delay since time ran out. They are, however, matters which do affect where t...

10. Maruera v Te Runanga o Ngati Maru Taranaki Trust [2020] Chief Judge's MB 965 (2020 CJ 965) [pdf, 500 KB]

    ...have jurisdiction to hear the present application? […] [21] I adopt the reasoning set out by the Court of Appeal above. The Court has inherent power to revisit its decisions in exceptional circumstances when required by the interests of justice. Recourse to the power to reopen must not undermine the general principle of finality. It is available only where a substantial miscarriage of justice 2020 Chief Judge’s MB 978 would result if fundamental error in procedure...