Search Results

1. NJ v UF [2023] NZDT 238 (22 May 2023) [pdf, 247 KB]

   ...of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the proceedings. This means you consider there was a breach of natural justice, as a result of procedural unfairness that affected the result of the proceedings. PLEASE NOTE: Parties need to be aware they cannot appeal a Referee’s finding of fact. Where a Referee has made a decision on the issues raised as part...

2. OIA-119562.pdf [pdf, 2 MB]

   Justice Centre | 19 Aitken Street DX SX10088 | Wellington T 04 918 8800 | F 04 918 8820 ContactUs@justice.govt.nz | www.justice.govt.nz 13 March 2025 Ref: OIA 119562 Tēnā koe Official Information Act request Thank you for your email of 15 February 2025 to the Ministry of Justice (the Ministry) requesting, under the Official Information Act 1982 (the Act), information regarding appeals and judicial reviews from the Family Court to the High Court. Specifically, you requested:...

3. EZ & UC v HQ & LQ [2024] NZDT 424 (15 May 2024) [pdf, 171 KB]

   ...issue. This is known as contributory negligence, where someone’s actions or inactions reduce the other party’s liabilities. 30. Considering this argument, I note that, at best, this can reduce but not relieve liability. This is because no matter what may or may not have been done by EZ, UC, and the inspector, I have found that HQ and LQ did breach the warranty. Furthermore, to detect the damage involved either the use of the shower over three weeks, effectively a long-term wate...

4. Sexual violence attrition and progression report [pdf, 762 KB]

   Attrition and progression Reported sexual violence victimisations in the criminal justice system Ministry of Justice 1 November 2019 2019 © Crown Copyright ISBN 978-0-478-32486-0 (online) Published by the Ministry of Justice Although all reasonable steps have been taken to ensure the accuracy of the information contained in this document, the Ministry of Justice disclaims any and all responsibility for any inaccuracy, error, omission, or any ot

5. People remanded on bail or at large and offending on bail or at large June 2019 [xlsx, 287 KB]

   Contents People remanded on bail or at large, and offending while on bail or at large This includes information on: - people remanded on 'bail' (including 'EM bail') or 'at large' - offences committed while on 'bail' or 'at large' - people offending on 'bail' or 'at large' - people who failed to answer bail. Contents: Number of people on bail or at large Table 1: Number and percentage of people on bail or at l

6. People remanded on bail or at large and offending on bail or at large December 2018 [xlsx, 281 KB]

   Contents People remanded on bail or at large, and offending while on bail or at large This includes information on: - people remanded on 'bail' (including 'EM bail') or 'at large' - offences committed while on 'bail' or 'at large' - people offending on 'bail' or 'at large' - people who failed to answer bail. Contents: Summary of people remanded on bail or at large Table 1: Number and percentage of people on b

7. RX v KL LCRO 31/2014 [pdf, 137 KB]

   ...sufficiently persuasive reasons to expunge the costs assessor’s report. Her concern is particularly acute in relation to the comments the Committee made about her conduct at the Committee hearing which are recorded under the heading “Other Matters” at [69]–[71] of the decision. It is not necessary to repeat the detail of those paragraphs here. Suffice to say the Committee expressed concern about what it considered to have been unsupported attacks by Miss RX on Committee m...

8. [2017] NZEmpC 122 Centraus Ltd v Barcena [pdf, 130 KB]

   ...respondents, together with Mr Michael King. [6] Mr King is a director of Centraus Ltd, as is Mr Barcena, the first respondent. [7] The first, second and third respondents are all employees of Centraus Ltd and work with clients on various engineering matters for Centraus Ltd. On 22 September 2017, they advised Mr King that they were resigning from Centraus Ltd. [8] Subsequently the applicant learned that a new company had been incorporated on 1 September 2017. Thi...

9. [2021] NZEmpC 35 Radford v Chief of New Zealand Defence Force [pdf, 415 KB]

   ...RADFORD v CHIEF OF NEW ZEALAND DEFENCE FORCE [2021] NZEmpC 35 [24 March 2021] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2021] NZEmpC 35 EMPC 396/2018 IN THE MATTER OF a referral of a question of law from the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN MISHELE RADFORD Plaintiff AND CHIEF OF NEW ZEALAND DEFENCE FORCE Defendant AND MINISTRY OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS AND...

10. [2022] NZEmpC 117 QDY v Counties Manukau District Health Board [pdf, 230 KB]

    ...ORDER PROHIBITING PUBLICATION OF APPLICANT’S NAME OR IDENTIFYING PARTICULARS IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2022] NZEmpC 117 EMPC 117/2022 IN THE MATTER OF an application for special leave to remove a matter to the Employment Court BETWEEN QDY Applicant AND COUNTIES MANUKAU DISTRICT HEALTH BOARD Respondent Hearing: On the papers Appearances:...