Search Results

1. Te Manutukutuku Issue 28 [pdf, 584 KB]

   Te Roopu Whakamana i te Tiriti 0 Waitangi Panui Tekau rna waru Pipiri 1994 Waitangi Tribunal Division Department of Justice Newsletter ISSN 0114-717X Number 28 June 1994 CLAIMS IN HEARING Chathams W AI 64 The Moriori inquiry was opened in the Chatham Islands 9-13 May, and continued the following week, 16-20 May, in Wellington. The claim concerns the failure of the Crown to recognise and protect Moriori customary rights to land and fisheries on Chatham and outlying islands...

2. GQ v M Ltd [2015] NZDT 1499 (30 April 2015) [pdf, 186 KB]

   ...Although misleading conduct need not be intentional to be actionable, the issues between the parties are CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 3 of 4 better understood as a failure to agree on a minimum term due to being at cross-purposes, rather than a matter of one party misleading the other to agree to a twelve-month term. What sum, if any, should GQ pay to M Ltd? 13. GQ argued that he did not get the results from the one month of Google AdWords that DN had led him to believe he would. H...

3. EG v WN Ltd [2017] NZDT 1423 (8 December 2017) [pdf, 187 KB]

   ...for a refund (s38(1)(a)). 19. However, any right to a refund is subject to s39(4), which requires consideration to be given to the benefits obtained, the costs incurred by the other party, the value of services performed and any other relevant matters. EG did not cancel until after the event. He proceeded with the additional payment and the goods were shipped. Had the company not made the error, it would have charged more, as would, presumably, any other competitor. The loss was...

4. TJ v HH [2019] NZDT 1522 (11 July 2019) [pdf, 154 KB]

   ...one or two more links than they claimed was shown in a photograph, and that their necklace was stamped 18K at only one end rather than both. 7. However, it was difficult to be sure how many links were shown in the photograph, and all of these are matters of memory, approximation, or impression rather than solid objective evidence from a qualified person. 8. TJ produced a report from QO, director of [Valuers], who said he has been an independent valuer for over thirty years, and is a...

5. FAQs

   ...is as efficient as possible. Can Tribunal decisions be appealed? The Act provides for an appeals process. Decisions can be appealed to the High Court on any grounds (fact or law), if agreed by the High Court. Subsequent appeals would be available on matters of law only. How does mediation work in the Tribunal? There are two pathways your claim in the Tribunal – the mediation pathway and the hearing pathway. After a discussion with the parties at the first case management conference, the Tribu...

   Located in:

   1. Tribunals >
   2. Canterbury Earthquakes Insurance Tribunal

6. Guidance for managing shared parenting during COVID-19 traffic light settings

   ...up to caregivers to decide if their parenting arrangements should be changed to take account of their vaccination status. In making this decision, we encourage caregivers to consider what would be in their child’s best interests, taking into account matters such as any health risks and the child’s right to a continuing relationship with both parents. If caregivers can’t agree on an arrangement, we recommend they seek legal advice about their options. For more information about seeking leg...

   Located in:

   1. About >
   2. News & media >
   3. News & media archive >
   4. COVID-19 news archive

7. Participating in a Virtual Meeting Room court hearing

   ...website(external link). Accredited media may request press sheets for specific defendants or cases. Accredited media have a right to attend hearings in all but exceptional circumstances and can register their interest to attend with the court where the matter will be heard. They may continue to join the video conference on the basis that they remain muted and do not record sound or capture video without express permission of the judge. The judge will decide if there is anything the media c...

   Located in:

   1. Courts >
   2. Going to court

8. Review progress reports

   ...Reviewers requested an extension as they need more time to meet community expectations of transparency as far as possible and wanted to give a wide range of members of the public the opportunity to express their views on issues relating to the Review. The matters being considered are complex and COVID-19 has had, and continues to have, a significant impact on the progress of the Review. Changing the report back date required the Prime Minister to consult the parliamentary Intelligence and Secur...

   Located in:

   1. Justice sector & policy >
   2. Key initiatives >
   3. Key initiatives archive >
   4. 2022 periodic review of the Intelligence and Security Act 2017

9. Proactive release - Second Interim Regulatory Impact Statement: Consultation options for adoption law reform [pdf, 1.6 MB]

   ...Conducting two rounds of public engagement within this timeframe has constrained the level and depth of evidence gathering and analysis which can be carried out prior to engagement. Regulatory Impact Statement | 4 • Defined scope: The following matters are out of scope of the reform: o Past adoption practice, as past adoption placements are being considered as part of the Royal Commission of Inquiry into Abuse in State Care and in the Care of Faith-based Institutions (‘the R...

10. RH v LV LCRO 189 / 2011 (25 September 2012) [pdf, 126 KB]

    ...Standards Committee 1 BETWEEN MR RH Practitioner AND MR LV Complainant DECISION Introduction [1] Just days before Christmas in 2007 the Practitioner, Mr RH, was approached by Mr LV (the Applicant) and asked for assistance in matters connected with the unexpected death of his wife. The Applicant had been a long standing client of the Practitioner (about 25 years) in his general law practice. At the time in issue the Practitioner had been some months in pr...