8020 items matching your search terms
BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2021] NZREADT 10 READT 022/2020 IN THE MATTER OF An appeal under section 111 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 BETWEEN MICHELLE BAKER and RODNEY BAKER Appellants AND THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS AUTHORITY (CAC 1901) First Respondent AND HAMISH DRUMM, MARK COFFEY, and SAFARI REAL ESTATE (t/a TOMMY’S REAL ESTATE) Second Respondents Hearing: 24 February 2021, at Well...
310 Aotea MB 292 IN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AOTEA DISTRICT A20050009249 UNDER Sections 18, 37, 98, 131 and 132 of Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Hokio A, Part Hokio A and Hokio Māori Township BETWEEN EUGENE HENARE, VIVIENNE TAUEKI, PHILIP TAUEKI, IAN HAENGA, PETER HEREMAIA, ALEX HOPA, KERI HORI TE PA as trustees of HOKIO A TRUST Applicants AND
...the support of a number of experienced persons in the industry. The Tribunal allowed the application for review, on the basis that the applicant’s licence would be subject to certain conditions. [27] We also refer to the judgment of his Honour Justice Nation in Real Estate Agents Authority v A, allowing the Registrar’s appeal against a decision of the Tribunal to reverse a decision not to renew the licence of a salesperson (“A”).5 In that case, A had been convicted on 26...
...pensory loan for TWOA that was pro�ided for in its 2001 deed of settlement with the Crown but not paid by December 2004 . Nor was it appropriate for the Tribunal to inquire into matters related to the financial crisis that TWOA experienced in February and March 2005, since these matters were then under in�estigation by the Auditor-General, who reported to Parlia...
...given, invalidate the notice previously given and thus deprive the subsequent strike or lockout action of its lawfulness. There are numerous cases to this effect but I will cite only the most pointed and authoritative one. [26] In Secretary for Justice v New Zealand Public Service Association Inc [1990] ERNZ Sel Case 601, [1990] 2 NZLR 36, the Court of Appeal considered whether communications purporting to modify industrial action but given subsequently to strike notice, impugned i...
...amount of time that courts often take to give reserve decisions. Given that there is no penalty and given that the delay is not excessive by any means, I am satisfied that this is a non-issue. Obviously there may be extreme cases where natural justice or Bill of Rights issues arise but this is clearly not one of them. [43] I return to the central issue. In this case, as I have set out, there have been numerous reports and recommendations by various experts covering many years. I...
...coronial inquiry Under section 69 of the Coroners Act 2006 a coroner may postpone opening an inquiry or adjourn an inquiry where he or she is satisfied that another investigation into the death is being conducted that is likely to establish the matters that a coroner is required to establish. These matters include the identity of the deceased, when and where the person died, and the causes and circumstances of the death. If the coroner is satisfied that the other investigation has...
(1) PERMANENT ORDER PROHIBITING RELEASE OF UNREDACTED DECISION TO PERSONS OTHER THAN THE PARTIES (2) PERMANENT ORDER PROHIBITING PUBLICATION OF NAME, ADDRESS, OCCUPATION AND IDENTIFYING DETAILS OF PLAINTIFF AND THE TRANSCRIPT REFERRED TO IN THIS DECISION (3) PERMANENT ORDER PREVENTING SEARCH OF THE TRIBUNAL FILE WITHOUT LEAVE OF THE TRIBUNAL OR OF THE CHAIRPERSON REDACTED DECISION OF TRIBUNAL1 1 This decision is to be cited as DIJ v New Zealand Police [2024] NZHRRT 22. Note
IN THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL TRI-2009-101- 000048 [2010] NZWHT WELLINGTON 24 BETWEEN VIVIENNE SMITHERAM AND BERNARD MCBRIDE Claimants AND PETER HANNS TRADING AS HANNS BUILDERS & JOINERS First Respondent AND ROGER WALKER ARCHITECTS LTD Second Respondent AND WELLINGTON CITY COUNCIL Third Respondent AND DION BARETA (Removed) Fourth Respondent AND K ROAD NO 1 LIMITED Fifth Respondent AND STOANZ LIMITED (Removed) Sixth Respondent AND HANNA
...required to issue five Procedural Orders to assist in the preparations for the Hearing, and to monitor the progress of these preparations. Although these Procedural Orders are not a part of this Determination, they are mentioned because some of the matters covered by these Orders will need to be referred to in this Determination. 1.4 The hearing was held on 23 and 24 August 2005 in the WHRS meeting rooms in Auckland Central. The Claimants were represented by Mr Don Bidwell (an...