Search Results

1. [2012] NZEmpC 172 Gregory v CE of the Department of Corrections [pdf, 301 KB]

   ...held usually on Wednesdays and attendees received email advice in advance of meetings. Ms Moors, in cross-examination, thought that the minutes may have been made at a later stage. However, she confirmed that the minutes did cover a number of matters which had been the subject of discussion at that time. [10] In the absence of any evidence from the defendant to contradict Mr Ryan’s advice, I conclude that these were minutes derived from the defendant’s computer on which such...

2. [2023] NZEmpC 20 Henry v South Waikato Achievement Trust [pdf, 385 KB]

   VIRGINIA HENRY v SOUTH WAIKATO ACHIEVEMENT TRUST [2023] NZEmpC 20 [22 February 2023] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2023] NZEmpC 20 EMPC 301/2021 IN THE MATTER OF challenges to determinations of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN VIRGINIA HENRY Plaintiff AND SOUTH WAIKATO ACHIEVEMENT TRUST Defendant Hearing: 10–12 and 18 August 2022 (Heard at...

3. Waitangi Tribunal theme Q - Foreshore [pdf, 559 KB]

   ...irresponsible to expose a major weakness in the assumed Crown title to an important public resource and simply leave it at that. So in the final sections of the report some proposals for future action are very diffidently advanced. One option is to clarify matters beyond doubt by simply announcing in statute that for the avoidance of doubt full title to the foreshore is, and shall be deemed always to have been, vested in the Crown. However such an action would be clearly expropriatory, a...

4. [2018] NZEmpC 43 A Labour Inspector v Smiths City Group Ltd [pdf, 503 KB]

   ...A LABOUR INSPECTOR OF THE MINISTRY OF BUSINESS, INNOVATION AND EMPLOYMENT v SMITHS CITY GROUP LIMITED NZEmpC CHRISTCHURCH [2018] NZEmpC 43 [8 May 2018] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT CHRISTCHURCH [2018] NZEmpC 43 EMPC 313/2016 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN A LABOUR INSPECTOR OF THE MINISTRY OF BUSINESS, INNOVATION AND EMPLOYMENT Plaintiff AND SMITHS CITY GROUP LIMITED Defendant...

5. Kingsnorth v Crawford - Motuaruhe 5D (2018) 199 Waiariki MB 203 (199 WAR 203) [pdf, 368 KB]

   ...IN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WAIARIKI DISTRICT I TE KOOTI WHENUA MĀORI O AOTEAROA TE ROHE O TE WAIARIKI A20170006751 A20170006804 UNDER Sections 19 and 18(1)(a), Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Motuaruhe 5D Block BETWEEN JOSEPH KINGSNORTH Applicant AND CAROLINE CRAWFORD, JENNIFER CRAWFORD AND COLLEEN HIGGINS AS TRUSTEES OF THE HARIATA KINGSNORTH WHĀNAU TRUST Respondents Hearings: 20...

6. [2021] NZACC 150 – Turnbull v ACC (30 September 2021) [pdf, 332 KB]

   IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2021] NZACC 150 ACR 178/17 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL UNDER SECTION 149 OF THE ACT BETWEEN D TURNBULL Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: 11 May 2021 Heard at: Dunedin/Ōtepoti Appearances: Mr Sara for the appellant Mr Hunt for the respondent Judgment: 30 September 2021 ___...

7. Wirihana-Tawake v Kauika-Stevens - Rangitatau 1D5A1 Takirau Marae (2021) 434 Aotea MB 114 (434 AOT 114) [pdf, 313 KB]

   ...Aotea MB 114 I TE KOOTI WHENUA MĀORI O AOTEAROA I TE ROHE O AOTEA In the Māori Land Court of New Zealand Aotea District A20210002425 WĀHANGA Under Section 19, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 MŌ TE TAKE In the matter of Rangitatau 1D5A1 Reserve (Tākirau Marae) I WAENGA I A Between SCOTT AARON BRUCE WIRIHANA- TAKAWE Te Kaitono Applicant CLARK KAUIKA-STEVENS Te Kaiurupare Respondent Nohoanga: Hea...

8. W v EQC [2021] CEIT-2019-0007 [pdf, 820 KB]

   ...the investigation at its expense. Mr Long is willing to attend the site to inspect the samples that have been taken so that he can prepare a report to the Tribunal on the adequacy of the repairs. [11] Despite attempts made in the past to resolve matters, the W’s are still raising matters of concern. To provide finality, therefore, I require the following process to be undertaken: (a) there will be a meeting on-site between Mr Long, EQC's engineer, and any engineer that th...

9. [2022] NZACC 163 – Harvey v ACC (22 August 2022) [pdf, 305 KB]

   IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2022] NZACC 163 ACR 134/19 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION UNDER SECTION 162(1) OF THE ACT FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL TO THE HIGH COURT BETWEEN THOMAS HARVEY Applicant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Submissions: M Darke for the Appellant B Johns and T Morrison for the Respondent Hearing: On the...

10. [2014] NZEmpC 188 The Warehouse Ltd v Harris [pdf, 501 KB]

    ...threatening behaviour when you told the customer you would call the police and issue a banning notice, even though no crime had been committed. 6) If you used Racist language to the customers. [17] The letter continued: … your explanation on these matters was not acceptable on points 1,2,3,4 and 5. I do accept that on point 6 there was no evidence to suggest that racist language was used and I excluded this from my decision. I feel that you did use intimidating and threatenin...