Search Results

1. LCRO 29/2023 CP v SW and KM (19 December 2023) [pdf, 245 KB]

   ...agreement. [15] It appears that the applicant and Ms AB were in [city 2] at the time. In the second email, the first respondent therefore sent the applicant the documents requiring signature, advised that they needed to be signed in front of the Justice of the Peace (JP) and explained how this needed to be done. [16] The applicant says that he called the first respondent to tell him that he could not find a JP, that he and Ms AB would be back in [city 1] on the morning of 25 December...

2. [2014] NZEmpC 111 Bracewell v Richmond Services Ltd [pdf, 300 KB]

   JAN SUSAN BRACEWELL v RICHMOND SERVICES LIMITED NZEmpC AUCKLAND [2014] NZEmpC 111 [1 July 2014] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2014] NZEmpC 111 ARC 91/13 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN JAN SUSAN BRACEWELL Plaintiff AND RICHMOND SERVICES LIMITED Defendant Hearing: 26 - 27 May 2014; and by documents filed on 3, 5, 6, 10 and 14 June 2014 Appearances:

3. 5. Transcript (weeks 9 & 10 Dunedin) [pdf, 3 MB]

   BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH ENV-2020-CHC-127 IN THE MATTER OF AND The Resource Management Act 1991 Of a notice of motion under section 149T(2) to decide proposed Plan Change 7 to the Regional Plan: Water for Otago (referred to the Environment Court by the Minister for the Environment under section 142(2)(b) of the Act) OTAGO REGIONAL COUNCIL Applicant Hearing Commenced: 28 June 2021 held in Dunedin Court: Environm

4. 5. Transcript (weeks 9 & 10 Dunedin) [pdf, 3.2 MB]

   BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH ENV-2020-CHC-127 IN THE MATTER OF AND The Resource Management Act 1991 Of a notice of motion under section 149T(2) to decide proposed Plan Change 7 to the Regional Plan: Water for Otago (referred to the Environment Court by the Minister for the Environment under section 142(2)(b) of the Act) OTAGO REGIONAL COUNCIL Applicant Hearing Commenced: 28 June 2021 held in Dunedin Court: Environm

5. Zagorski v Wilkinson Building and Construction Limited [2012] NZWHT Auckland 43 [pdf, 149 KB]

   ...between the negligence and the damage is relevant. [50] The courts have generally eschewed a mathematical approach and acknowledged that precision in apportionment is not often possible. Instead the Tribunal should stand back to see where the justice of the case requires an overall contribution to be fixed having regard to the level of responsibility and blameworthiness of each of the liable respondents. [51] The parties primarily responsible for the defective work are...

6. [2021] NZEmpC 45 Senate Investment Trust Through Crown Lease Trustees Ltdv Cooper [pdf, 248 KB]

   ...in Smith v Stokes Valley Pharmacy Ltd. 2 See Blackmore v Honick Properties Ltd [2011] NZEmpC 152, [2011] ERNZ 445 at [98]. He held that, as trial provisions remove longstanding employee protection and access to dispute resolution and justice, a strict approach to compliance with the terms of s 67A should be taken.3 This strict approach extends to the execution of written individual employment agreements: [100] On the other hand, the employer’s form of draft agreement...

7. Māori Land Court Minute Book Referencing [pdf, 470 KB]

   ...have one minute book series for a district or the court as a whole; rather, it made more sense to have multiple minute books based on geographic location or activity. Prior to its integration into the Department for Courts and Ministry of Justice, the Māori Land Court was part of a section within the Department of Māori Affairs (often referred to as the court section). Disestablished in 1989, the former Department had support staff located at many offices around New Zeala...

8. Jessup v Accident Compensation Corporation (Work Related Gradual Process Injury) [2022] NZACC 218 [pdf, 215 KB]

   ...30(3) for those people suffering from the occupational diseases listed in Schedule 2 without them having to bring themselves within the definition in s 30(1) and, consequently, the circumstances referred to in s 30(2) at all. [29] In Hastings,2 Justice Cull stated: [34] … Priddle does not stand for the proposition that once a claim is made under s 30(3)(b)(i) that workplace exposure nay have occurred, there is a presumption of cover … … [39] I also find there is some for...

9. Waitangi Tribunal Vol 1 Kāhui Maunga Report [pdf, 7.2 MB]

   t e K ā h u i M a u n g a Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz t e K ā h u i M a u n g a The National Park District Inquiry Report Volume 1 Waitangi Tribunal Report 2013 Wai 1130 Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz National Library of New Zealand Catalo

10. [2017] NZEnvC 165 Yaldhurst Quarries Joint Action Group v Christchurch City Council [pdf, 5.2 MB]

    BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT IN THE MATTER AND BETWEEN AND AND Decision No. [2017] NZEnvC 165 of the Resource Management Act 1991 of an appeal pursuant to s 120 of the Act YALDHURST QUARRIES JOINT ACTION GROUP (ENV-2016-CHC-049) Appellant CHRISTCHURCH CITY COUNCIL Respondent HAREWOOD GRAVELS LIMITED Applicant Court: Environment Judge J E Borthwick Environment Commissioner R M Dunlop Environment Commissioner J A Hodges Hearing: at Christchurch on 22 to 24 Ma...