Search Results

1. Almirante & Others v Sparks [2018] NZIACDT 10 (3 April 2018) [pdf, 88 KB]

   ...the Code of Conduct that have been proven (in the case of Mr Balatbat’s complaint) and are admitted (in the case of the other 10 complainants in issue); Re-licensing (s 51(1)(e) of the Act) The Adviser is to be prevented from reapplying for a licence to be a licensed immigration adviser for a period of two years. Other redress As the complainants’ request, the Adviser has also agreed to write to Immigration New Zealand in relation to the files it holds for each of the complain...

2. 2020 NZPSPLA 027 [pdf, 83 KB]

   ...considers the Police have changed their story. I however note that Constable Shorn was not involved in Mr M’ arrest or prosecution. He is an alcohol harm protection officer and as such is the person who files and prosecutes complaints against licence and certificate holders with the Licensing Authority. He is therefore well placed to make an assessment as to whether the CCTV footage disclosed any misconduct or breach of the Act by Ms C. [5] I have also viewed both the CCTV footag...

3. Bay of Plenty Regional Council v Emery - Te Koutu Mourea (2006) 305 Rotorua MB 19 (305 ROT 19) [pdf, 807 KB]

   305 Rotorua MB 19 IN THE MAORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WAIARIKI DISTRICT A20060027081 A20060028121 UNDER 8ection328, Te Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Te Koutu Mourea - Consent to occupation licence BETWEEN BAY OF PLENTY REGIONAL COUNCIL Applicant AND DEBRA JOY TEPORA EMERY Respondent Hearing: 13 November 2006 (Heard at Rotorua) Appearances: Mr Cooney, for BOPRC Mr Lawson, for the trustees ofTe KouhI Mourea Ms Emery, personally and on behalf of various own...

4. BI v NX [2024] NZDT 310 (22 May 2024) [pdf, 92 KB]

   ...was assessed by a panel beater as being uneconomic to repair. BI now claims $24,200.00 for the loss of his car. 3. BI’s car was not insured. NX had third party insurance however a claim was declined as she was driving outside the terms of her licence as she was driving after 10pm and with a passenger. 4. The issues I have to consider are: a. Did NX cause the damage by failing to take reasonable care? b. If so, what is the appropriate remedy? Did NX cause the damage by...

5. OIA-Wall Walk [pdf, 2.9 MB]

   ...table 2 attached, which provides the total amount spent on staff attending the Wall Walk Workshop, in the last three financial years. In response to part 6, as noted in Table 2, below, the Ministry paid $9,500 (GST excl.) for 100 online module licences in 2023/24. In response to parts 7 and 8 of your request, table 3 lists the information available on the Ministry’s intranet that comes within the scope of part 7 and 8 of your request. These documents have been provided to yo...

6. READT Annual Report 2012 [pdf, 280 KB]

   ...2011/12 financial year. Table 2: Cases disposed 2011/12 Cases withdrawn or settled 34 Cases with final decisions 58 TOTAL 92 In its final decisions, the Tribunal imposed penalties ranging from fines to suspensions to cancellation of licences. It has power to award compensation up to $100,000. In addition, the Tribunal issued 13 interim decisions (suspension or suppression orders) and 5 separate penalty decisions. 83 19 3 Notices of Appeal Charges Applicatio...

7. Kaka v Ruapehu District Council - Ohura South No 2E1B Block (2015) 337 Aotea MB 143 (337 AOT 143) [pdf, 122 KB]

   ...charging order as sought by RDC. Procedural history [5] As foreshadowed, on 22 August 2014 I granted a charging order against the land in favour of RDC in respect of unpaid rates and appointed an agent for the purposes of arranging a lease or licence of the land for the benefit of the owners, and negotiating with RDC payment of all costs currently due and owing on the land. 2 [6] On 29 September 2014 I heard the application for rehearing. 3 Mr Kaka appeared in person. He sough...

8. CAC20026 v Mr X [2012] NZREADT 76 [pdf, 93 KB]

   ...of the proceedings, including the Tribunal’s decision on his appeal, contain allegations against him which he has not had the opportunity of testing at a hearing. 1.6 The defendant is no longer practising as a licensee and does not hold a licence under the Real Estate Agents Act 2008. 1.7 An order prohibiting publication of the defendant’s and complainant’s name and identifying details, including the names of the properties involved namely “building X” and “building...

9. Bulling v New Zealand Transport Agency (Referral back to Human Rights Commission) [2015] NZHRRT 44 [pdf, 42 KB]

   ...this matter referred back to the Human Rights Commission under s 92D of the Human Rights Act 1993 for mediation. Background [2] In these proceedings Mr Bulling complains of unlawful discrimination in relation to the renewal of his driver’s licence and the requirement for him to undergo a further eyesight test from a doctor or optometrist. 1 [This decision is to be cited as: Bulling v New Zealand Transport Agency (Referral B...

10. Hau v Ruddell - Oue 2B2B2 (2017) 162 Taitokerau MB 50 (162 TTK 50) [pdf, 194 KB]

    ...maintained against a co- owner in possession, unless such possession completely excludes the other co-owners and they are deemed to have been ousted. Each tenant in common can also deal with their undivided share by leasing it or by granting a licence to a third party, although they cannot bind the other co-owners.1 [8] There is no evidence that Errol Mau had authority to act as an agent for the owners when he signed the lease. However, Errol is an owner in the land. He is entit...