Search Results

1. The Registrar of Immigration Advisers v Niland [2018] NZIACDT 52 (21 December 2018) [pdf, 262 KB]

   ...Code: Client Care 2. A licensed immigration adviser must: … e. obtain and carry out the informed lawful instructions of the client Legislative requirements 3. A licensed immigration adviser must: … c. whether in New Zealand or offshore, act in accordance with New Zealand immigration legislation, including the Immigration Act 2009, the Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007 and any applicable regulations. Written Agreements 18. A licensed immigration adviser mus...

2. [2017] NZEnvC 172 Motiti Rohe Moana Trust v Bay of Plenty Regional Council [pdf, 185 KB]

   ...matters may be relevant: (a) Hauraki Gulf Marine Spatial Planning Documents (non statutory) developed recently and; (b) The Goat Island Sanctuary Study just published in relation to Gulf snapper stocks. (c) The Coastal/Marina plans/controls for NZ offshore islands (including Kermadec and Auckland islands). 5 are satisfied that with these conditions there is no undue prejudice. Furthermore, the evidence of the Crown on the matters identified is relevant to the hearing. Although...

3. Notes from Crown Maori Relations hui Taranaki 5 May 2018 [pdf, 432 KB]

   ...delegates responsibility to local government, but there is no monitoring, no accountability to central government and that there needs to be a mechanism for this. • Te Taiao – the environment -Two speakers raised the point that with the end to offshore drilling in Taranaki, there also needs to be investment in renewable energy. We absolutely oppose the nationalisation of freshwater. All freshwater in the rohe comes from Taranaki maunga, and because we have a different relation...

4. [2022] NZEnvC 053 G & T Family Trust v Western Bay of Plenty District Council [pdf, 257 KB]

   ...guided by the general principles of the Court’s Practice Note.5 Paragraph 6.6(d) of the Practice Note lists five factors that are 1 Tairua Marine Ltd v Waikato Regional Council [2006] NZRMA 485 (HC). 2 Environmental Protection Authority v BW Offshore Singapore Pte Ltd [2021] NZHC 2577 at [19]. 3 Trotter v Brain [2015] NZEnvC 150 at [14]. 4 Bridgecorp Limited (In Receivership) v Hamilton City Council A021/2008, 5 March 2008 at [20]. 5 Environment Court Practice Note 2014, at claus...

5. KD & DF v L Ltd [2024] NZDT 775 (20 August 2024) [pdf, 142 KB]

   ...(as outlined in NZS 3064). Comment: some manufacturers may require more durable fixings than those stated below or in NZS 3604 to maintain product warranties.” 21. I note on the relevant exposure zone map states: NOTE: Zone D includes all offshore islands, the area within 500m of the coastline of New Zealand and those areas shown in white. The map shall be read in conjunction with 4.2 in NZS3064:2011. 22. I appreciate that NM undertook the re-cladding work in genuine good fait...

6. E91 Kurt Grant - Construction Methodology - RE – Applicant [pdf, 9.5 MB]

   BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA ENV-2018-AKL-000078 IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 (RMA) AND IN THE MATTER of the direct referral of applications for resource consent for the necessary infrastructure and related activities associated with holding the America's Cup in Auckland BETWEEN PANUKU DEVELOPMENT AUCKLAND Applicant AND AUCKLAND COUNCIL Regulatory Authority REBUTTAL EVIDENCE OF KURT ADR

7. Andrew Michael Collins - Evidence in Chief [pdf, 1.4 MB]

   ...of outstanding natural character. On page 326 of Appendix J, RPS - refer my Attachment 1. 7 1108 • Map 21a in Appendix I of the RPS (Natural Character Maps) which shows the MNE Area as being primarily High Natural Character, but with six offshore islands and reefs being of Outstanding Natural Character; followed by an extract from Appendix J (Natural Character Attributes) that sets out the details of the MNE area and its character. The MNE is explained6 as covering "the...

8. BORA Overseas Investment Bill [pdf, 174 KB]

   ...and treats non-citizens who are not ordinarily resident in New Zealand differently from citizens and residents of New Zealand. 7. The Bill’s policy objective is to control ownership of sensitive New Zealand assets by persons who are based offshore and whose connection with New Zealand is tenuous. The Bill seeks to achieve this objective by imposing a consent regime under which the impact of proposed investments can be given proper consideration, which seems to bear a rational and...

9. BORA Taxation (Neutralising Base Erosions and Profit Shifting) Bill [pdf, 205 KB]

   ...artificially high interest rates on loans from related parties to shift profits out of New Zealand, hybrid mismatch arrangements that exploit differences between countries’ tax rules, and transactions with related parties which effectively shift profits to offshore members of the multinational group. 6. Section 29 of the Bill of Rights Act provides that the rights and freedoms which apply to natural persons also apply to legal persons, as far as practicable. Section 15 of the Companie...

10. [2020] NZEmpC 137 Sinton v Coatesville Motors 2013 Ltd [pdf, 145 KB]

    ...Ltd, Judge Couch held that the Court could hear and decide matters which were not actually determined by the Authority, providing they were a part of the Authority’s investigation. [10] As was observed by (now) Chief Judge Inglis, in Udovenko v Offshore Marine Services (NZ) Ltd, an overly technical approach is not to be taken on this issue, as this would enable form to trump substance. The Court referred to dicta of the Court of Appeal that parties should have every opportunity t...