Search Results

1. Unnikrishnan v Goldsmith [2016] NZIACDT 29 (2 June 2016) [pdf, 177 KB]

   ...identified that Ms Goldsmith’s email of 19 February 2013 provides erroneous advice that resulted from her lack of understanding. She ought to have been on notice given she was dealing with a polytechnic that was obviously familiar with the enrolment of offshore students. However, Ms Goldsmith’s email said: I have tried my best to make [the Polytechnic] understand how Immigration work and what the criteria and regulations are. They do not seem to understand it at all and insist that [...

2. J. Kim v K. E. H. Kim [2016] NZIACDT 32 (22 June 2016) [pdf, 172 KB]

   ...complainant in the course of the client engagement process. She says she did that, by email, but that her computer was stolen in a burglary and she cannot access the email. Ms Kim said it was her “common practice” to email the Code when dealing with offshore clients. The complainant’s response is that there was no email with a copy of the Code attached, and said Ms Kim “always makes an excuse that her laptop was stolen, was hacked or caused an error.” [28] Ms Kim is not alleged...

3. Bullent v Standing [2012] NZIACDT 54 (30 August 2012) [pdf, 131 KB]

   ...overseas clients of $635,769.49 are less than the total fees Mr Standing received. [100] Mr Standing is facing complaints before this Tribunal that he procured the payment of fees and failed to perform work; in many cases those fees were deposited into offshore bank accounts. [101] This information is sufficient to raise a concern that Mr Standing has received a substantial body of fees which have not been accounted for. [102] Accordingly, the Tribunal puts Mr Standing on notice that...

4. McLaren v Standing [2012] NZIACDT 56 (30 August 2012) [pdf, 134 KB]

   ...overseas clients of $635,769.49 are less than the total fees Mr Standing received. [107] Mr Standing is facing complaints before this Tribunal that he procured the payment of fees and failed to perform work; in many cases those fees were deposited into offshore bank accounts. [108] This information is sufficient to raise a concern that Mr Standing has received a substantial body of fees which have not been accounted for. [109] Accordingly, the Tribunal puts Mr Standing on notice that...

5. E55 Heather Kirkham - EIC - the Crown [pdf, 694 KB]

   ...(20 years) International. Umpire (10 years), International Jury member at many World Championships. c. Competitive sailor competing at international regattas and world championships 1973-1985 in international dinghy and keelboats (in shore and offshore racing). d. Worked as part of a consulting team for Morgan and Banks management services division on opportunities arising from an America’s Cup hosting in Auckland. (1988). e. Director/Board member of Yachting New Zealand for eight...

6. NJUM v Vole [2020] NZIACDT 5 (29 January 2020) [pdf, 126 KB]

   ...licensed immigration adviser must be honest, professional, diligent and respectful and conduct themselves with due care and in a timely manner. Legislative requirements 3. A licensed immigration adviser must: … c. whether in New Zealand or offshore, act in accordance with New Zealand immigration legislation, including the Immigration Act 2009, the Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007 and any applicable regulations. 4 Section 50. 5...

7. INZ (Greathead) v Ortiz [2019] NZIACDT 59 (29 August 2019) [pdf, 154 KB]

   ...[97], [128] & [151] (citation omitted). 9 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee, above n 8, at [97], [101]–[102] & [112]. 11 Legislative requirements 3. A licensed immigration adviser must: … c. whether in New Zealand or offshore, act in accordance with New Zealand immigration legislation, including the Immigration Act 2009, the Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007 and any applicable regulations. Written agreements 18. A licensed immigration adviser mu...

8. [2022] NZIACDT 19 – TA v Tian (Sanctions) (25 July 2022) [pdf, 185 KB]

   ...unlawfully in New Zealand to this day. But Ms Tian is not responsible for the complainant staying in this country knowing of his unlawful status. The proper course of action now would be for him to depart New Zealand and seek a new visa from offshore. The complainant 8 See TA v Tian, above n 1 at [21]. 10 requests that the Tribunal recommend to Immigration NZ that it grant him a student visa. The grant of visas is for Immigration NZ and not this Tribunal, but the compla...

9. Committee on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination – summary record 18th-20th reports [pdf, 148 KB]

   ...concerns expressed by NGOs and UNHCR that the Bill would violate the State party’s obligations under the 1951 and 1967 Refugee Conventions. While commending the State party’s decision to resettle 150 refugees who were subject to Australia’s offshore processing legislation, he asked whether the Government would consider admitting them in addition to, as opposed to as part of, the State party’s refugee quota. He requested confirmation of reports that refugees or asylum seekers...

10. ENVC Hearing 6Oct14 WML evidence chief John Leman [pdf, 4.3 MB]

    ...criteria. 54. Having established some benchmark criteria, the challenge is then to translate this to a reasonable form of wave limit criteria (to cross check against the all important complaint based criteria). 55. The Australian Marine and Offshore Group undertook a study to review acceptability of pontoon movement. Two pontoons were modelled, Type A, being a 9m x 3m with Ai having a 6 tonne displacement and Aii 12.7 tonnes and Type B, a 12m x 4m pontoon with Bi having a 9.9...