Search Results

Search results for parking.

2820 items matching your search terms

  1. Waitangi Tribunal Vol 3 Kāhui Maunga Report [pdf, 13 MB]

    ...a Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz t e K ā h u i M a u n g a The National Park District Inquiry Report Volume 3 Waitangi Tribunal Report 2013 Wai 1130 Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz National Library of New Zealand Cataloguing-in-Publication Data New Zea...

  2. BE v TU Ltd [2018] NZDT 1502 (6 December 2018) [pdf, 86 KB]

    ...RESPONDENT TU Limited The Tribunal hereby orders: TU Limited is to pay the sum of $150.00 to BE on or before Thursday 20 December 2018. Reasons: 1. On 11 June 2018, BE visited the [country] Embassy at [address 1]. He parked in space 75, which was one of a line of thirteen or so angle parks to the right-hand side of the driveway as he drove in. Soon afterwards, his car was clamped by TU Limited and he had to pay a fee of $150.00 for the car to be released. 2...

  3. ENVC Hearing 6Oct14 s274 evidence chief Anthony King-Turner [pdf, 98 KB]

    ...demand from ferry users. Waiheke’s population was a little over 3000. 13. The late 1980s heralded the beginning of the use of the big, fast Fullers ferries to and from Waiheke. This created a surge of ferry user numbers and a need for more car parks due to the halving of the time spent on the water. Almost overnight Waiheke Island became a good option for commuters to live in. Since the early 1980’s Waiheke’s resident population has almost trebled to more than 8000 people....

  4. JT v Q Ltd [2024] NZDT 227 (24 February 2024) [pdf, 91 KB]

    ...TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 227 APPLICANT JT RESPONDENT Q Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. Q Ltd is to pay JT $95.00 on or before 18 March 2024. 2. JT is not liable to Q Ltd for $325.00. Reasons Introduction 1. On 15 August 2023 JT parked within the business location of [address]. She went into the bakery and returned a short time later. In or around 20 September 2023 she received a reminder letter from Q Ltd informing of an earlier Breach Notice for $95.00 that had be...

  5. SU v F Ltd [2023] NZDT 266 (25 May 2023) [pdf, 108 KB]

    ...The Tribunal orders: SU is to pay the sum of $80.00 to F Ltd on or before Wednesday 14 June 2023. Reasons: 1. SU seeks a declaration that he is not liable to pay $250 demanded for exceeding the time limit on 18 July 2022 in a private car park managed by F Ltd. The initial charge was $80, but further charges totalling $120 were added for late payment, and $50 for debt collection fees. 2. The issues to be determined are: a) Did SU breach a contract with F Ltd? b) Are the charg...

  6. TQ & BC v B Transport [2023] NZDT 441 (30 August 2023) [pdf, 182 KB]

    ...were no longer there). TQ says immediately after the incident, the parking attendant put orange cones in place over the bolts in the ground. 3. TQ and BC did gain entry to the carpark after discussion with another (remote) attendant, and they parked in a vacant EV parking space, paying a $12.00 fee for parking. When they returned to their vehicle after their show, they were unable to repair the puncture and were unable to book a tow truck to attend before the closing hours of the car...

  7. Lam v The Real Estate Agents Authority (CAC 413) and Austin [2018] NZREADT 43 [pdf, 439 KB]

    ...there was a material misrepresentation about the total number of car parks. [9] This was the correct conclusion, he said, because it was unlawful to use the two on street carparks. To use those carparks would infringe a regulation which forbids parking in front of a vehicle entrance. Therefore when the second respondent and the vendor asserted that there were two on street carparks that was a misrepresentation. [10] The respondents stated that the two street car parks were avai...

  8. McCarthy - Estate of Huia Maria McCarthy (2014) 88 Taitokerau MB 115 (88 TTK 115) [pdf, 532 KB]

    ...506282, 506281, 506280 281263 Lot 31 P No.3F Parish of Rangitaiki SA31 B/460 Lot 59B No.3C Parish of Matata 389142 Lot 72B No.3A No.2B No.2B Parish 296345 of Matata Lot 72B NO.3Y No.9A Parish of 329656 Matata (Tu te Ao Marae) ,. Huia Parkes Huia Parkes (Mrs McCarthy) Huia Parkes (Mrs McCarthy) Huia Parkes Huia Parkes Huia Parkes Huia Parkes (Mrs McCarthy) Huia Parkes Huia Parkes Huia Parkes Huia Parkes Huia Parkes (Mrs McCarthy) Lot 8 of Lot 21 Parish o...

  9. MU v QT Ltd [2024] NZDT 210 (4 March 2024) [pdf, 104 KB]

    ...parked within [address], [city]. There is a complex of six units at this complex and is a unit title development with common areas managed by a body corporate. 2. QT Ltd sent three Breach Notices to the driver and owner of [registration number] for parking in breach of the signage at the car park on 28 April at 8.02am and on the same day at 6.08pm; and on 3 May at 6.41pm. Each breach notice sought payment of $95.00. MU’s son paid the first breach notice before talking to his father...

  10. [2021] NZREADT 15 - Feng (12 April 2021) [pdf, 282 KB]

    ...licensees had described the property in the advertisement as follows: If you are looking for a spacious and comfortable home in the central city area then this would be the perfect for you. The beautiful freehold 3-bedroom apartment with 2 carparks is not something that you see all the time. [4] After visiting the property to inspect it, the complainant purchased it at auction in June 2016. He said that he acquired the property with the intention of letting the apartment and both...