Search Results

1. ENV-2016-AKL-000186 Viaduct Harbour Holdings Limited v Auckland Council [pdf, 1.2 MB]

   ...[1] This appeal relates to the Proposed Auckland Unitary Plan. The Appellant appealed part of the Council's decision that rejected the part of the Hearings Panel's recommendation on Transport imposing, under Rule E27.6.2.1, a maximum parking rate of 1 car park per 125m2 of gross floor area for all non-residential activities within the "Outer core" parking area in the Business - City Centre Zone in the Central Area (including the Viaduct Harbour Precinct). The Cou...

2. ENVC Hearing 27Jul15 AC supplementary evidence Stephen Brown [pdf, 160 KB]

   ...layout of the Matiatia Marina, as detailed in the evidence of Mr Robert Pryor (dated 22 June 2015) at his paragraph 8. I have reviewed that statement, together with Build Media’s accompanying “Folio of Figures – Amended Marina Design With Parking Deck” dated 22 May 2015. 4. This statement is brief, insofar as it states that I largely agree with Mr Pryor’s opinions about the reconfigured marina proposal, especially so in relation to: • The revised breakwaters; �...

3. CT & BT v Q Ltd [2025] NZDT 110 (3 April 2025) [pdf, 190 KB]

   ...applicant to the claim, and as a respondent on the counterclaim. 2. The claim against BT is dismissed. For the avoidance of doubt, BT is not liable to liable to pay any amount to Q Ltd, or any debt collection companies engaged by Q Ltd in relation to parking breach number [redacted] dated 9 September 2024 which is the subject of this claim. 3. CT is to pay Q Ltd the sum of $95.00 on or before 24 April 2025. Reasons: 1. A car driven by CT, but owned by her father BT, parked for...

4. E101 Bronwyn Coomer-Smit - Traffic - RE - Council [pdf, 1.1 MB]

   ...concerning the existing loading bay on the western side of Lower Hobson Street; b) The corporate evidence of Lester McGrath for the Auckland Theatre Company (ATC), and the traffic evidence of John Parlane for ATC, in both cases concerning carparking and the proposed reduction in carparks available to visitors to the theatre. 1.5. I also provide a brief update in response to the amended conditions circulated by the Applicant on 24 August 2018. 2. QUALIFICATIONS AND EXP...

5. Waitangi Tribunal Vol 2 Kāhui Maunga Report [pdf, 12 MB]

   ...a Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz t e K ā h u i M a u n g a The National Park District Inquiry Report Volume 2 Waitangi Tribunal Report 2013 Wai 1130 Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz National Library of New Zealand Cataloguing-in-Publication Data New Zea...

6. LN v B Ltd [2024] NZDT 634 (15 November 2024) [pdf, 172 KB]

   ...he was in was not a public carpark nor any signage he would be towed. 3. The problem with LN’s claim is this is not a carpark open and available to the public. B Ltd says a private carpark does not need signage but has provided photos of the parking area showing various signage with ‘NO PARKING’ and ‘TOW AWAY ZONE’ painted in clear and bold letters on the ground. There was no signage specifically painted in the space LN had parked in but the space was marked with a ‘8’. B...

7. HW v BU Ltd [2023] NZDT 3 (18 January 2023) [pdf, 175 KB]

   ...[2023] NZDT 3 APPLICANT HW RESPONDENT BU Ltd The Tribunal orders: BU Ltd must pay HW $420.00 by 4pm on 8 February 2023. Reasons: 1. On 11 November 2022 the applicant was charged $420.00 after his car was towed from a carparking building. The applicant had purchased a monthly subscription to park in any unreserved bay the carparking building. The applicant claims the signage was confusing which led him to park in the wrong place. The applicant also claims that t...

8. LCRO 126/2013 MZ v JK [pdf, 128 KB]

   ...title development in central [City] known as Unit 1D/21 [street], also described as Unit 3, Lot 2 (Unit 1D). [3] On 12 October 2010, the trustees of the MZ Family Trust (the Trust) entered into an agreement with ABCL to purchase Unit 1D and a parking space described in the sale and purchase agreement prepared by the real estate agent as [alphanumeric code]. Mr MZ acted for the Trust in the purchase. 2 [4] As Unit 1D was a unit in a body corporate development, a certificate...

9. ENVC Hearing 27Jul15 DM suppl evidence Christine Gisby [pdf, 87 KB]

   ...the period from October 2014, Explore Group has operated a bus which has met some of its ferries. For a fee the bus has collected arriving passengers at Matiatia, provided a mini tour and dropped them at Oneroa. The bus, when it operates, has parked in and departed from the keyhole. 2 8. In or about late October 2014, Sealink also began to operate a small “fast ferry” passenger service sailing from downtown Auckland to Matiatia. The Sealink ferry operates on weekends...

10. NM v BU Ltd [2021] NZDT 1580 (24 June 2021) [pdf, 210 KB]

    ...Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2021] NZDT 1580 APPLICANT NM RESPONDENT BU Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reason 1. On Sunday 11 April 2021 NM’s car was towed from a parking space for ‘CT’ customers in [Suburb]. He had to pay $380.00 to retrieve his car from BU Ltd’s Yard. The issue to decide is whether he can recover that money. 2. NM raised 4 reasons why he should recover his money, which...