Search Results

1. BN & HH v KT & BB [2023] NZDT 402 (23 August 2023) [pdf, 228 KB]

   ...needs replacing. The applicants rely upon Clause 7.3(1) of the standard agreement, that the fireplace is a fixture and provides heating and should be in “reasonable working order”. 3. The issues to be resolved are: (a) Is the fireplace a service or amenity? (b) If so, can the respondents rely on “due diligence”. (c) Was the condition of the fireplace in breach of the warranties? (d) If so, what is the remedy? Is the fireplace a service or amenity? 4. The res...

2. BN v N Ltd [2024] NZDT 633 (12 September 2024) [pdf, 173 KB]

   ...NZDT 633 APPLICANT BN RESPONDENT N Ltd The Tribunal orders: N Ltd is to pay $1943.75 to BN on or before 10 October 2024. Reasons 1. On 27 May 2024 the parties contracted for BN to provide locum pharmacist services to N Ltd for 6 days in June 2024 (June 4,5, 9, 10, 11 and 12). Hours and rates were agreed. 2. At 7.21pm on 28 May, NQ from N Ltd messaged BN to say that their pharmacist had cancelled his annual leave so they no longer needed her s...

3. SB v XQ Ltd [2024] NZDT 663 (3 September 2024) [pdf, 185 KB]

   ...3. NS appeared on behalf of XQ Limited. NS confirmed the company was no longer pursuing SB for recovery, and denied XQ Limited was legally responsible for the costs claimed by SB. 4. The Issues to be resolved are: a. Has XQ Limited provided services with reasonable care and skill? b. If not, is SB entitled to compensation, and if so what is a reasonable sum? Has XQ Limited provided services with reasonable care and skill? 5. Contracts can include both express terms agreed betw...

4. XB v KI [2022] NZDT 226 (5 December 2022) [pdf, 198 KB]

   ...past fact that is false. 13. XB says that KI misrepresented the car because when he asked her if it had any mechanical or electrical issues, she replied no. The day prior to XB test driving the car, KI had taken the car to [A mechanic] for a service. The service report indicates that the DPF light was on the day before the test drive. XB says this is evidence that there was a mechanical or electrical issue with the car, yet KI told him there was no such issue. 14. There was a dis...

5. BI v O Inc [2024] NZDT 725 (21 October 2024) [pdf, 164 KB]

   ...1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 725 APPLICANT BI RESPONDENT O Inc The Tribunal orders: The claim by BI is dismissed. Reasons 1. BI was a member of the O Inc. From 2022, he became unhappy with the views and services being provided by O Inc. He began voicing these concerns. Ultimately, after a series of complaints and counter-complaints, BI was expelled from O Inc. He now seeks recovery of membership and other costs. 2. The issues to resolve t...

6. [2006] NZEmpC WC 17/06 Bryson v Three Foot Six Ltd [pdf, 54 KB]

   ...Bryson v Three Foot Six Ltd unreported, P R Stapp, 10 February 2006, WA 20/06 3 Section 179, Employment Relations Act 2000 1. Application for leave to challenge out of time [10] This application was filed on 1 May 2006 following a telephone conference on 26 April 2006 with the Court to establish whether, pursuant to s182(3)(b), what directions should be made in relation to the issues involved in the non de novo hearing, and the nature and extent of that hearing. At that...

7. LCRO 1/2020 NR v YB (28 June 2021) [pdf, 150 KB]

   ...resulted in the unsatisfactory conduct finding being made against Ms NR. Over time Ms NR’s hourly rates increased. There is nothing unusual in that of itself. As a general observation, although there may be some, it is difficult to think of a service that holds the same price for over 3 years. There is usually some adjustment. To an extent, it is self-serving for a client to assume a law firm will hold its rates, but the Rules place the obligation on the lawyer to dispel any su...

8. OIA-99253.pdf [pdf, 275 KB]

   ...held by the Ministry of Justice or believed to be held by another department. If you are not satisfied with this response, you have the right to make a complaint to the Ombudsman under section 28(3) of the Act. The Ombudsman may be contacted by phone on 0800 802 602 or by email to info@ombudsman.parliament.nz Nāku noa, nā Bruce Findlay Acting Group Manager, Courts and Tribunals, Regional Service Delivery Section (9) (2) (a) Section (9) (2) (a) Section (9) (2) (a)...

9. OIA-99500.pdf [pdf, 214 KB]

   ...here: courtsofnz.govt.nz/going-to-court/media/finding-out-about-a-case/ If you are not satisfied with this response, you have the right to make a complaint to the Ombudsman under section 28(3) of the Act. The Ombudsman may be contacted by phone on 0800 802 602 or by email to info@ombudsman.parliament.nz. Nāku noa, nā Bruce Findlay Acting Group Manager Courts and Tribunals, Regional Service Delivery Section (9) (2) (a) Section (9) (2) (a) Section (9) (2)...

10. OIA 99278 [pdf, 212 KB]

    ...available: justice.govt.nz/assets/Documents/Forms/Code-of- Conduct-2019.pdf If you are not satisfied with this response, you have the right to make a complaint to the Ombudsman under section 28(3) of the Act. The Ombudsman may be contacted by phone on 0800 802 602 or by email to info@ombudsman.parliament.nz. Nāku noa, nā Bruce Findlay Acting Group Manager Courts and Tribunals, Regional Service Delivery Section (9) (2) (a) Section (9) (2) (a) Section (9) (2...