Search Results

1. Witana v Tau - Omapere Taraire E (2019) 191 Taitokerau MB 1 (191 TTK 1) [pdf, 535 KB]

   ...sign the agreement Top Energy could just take under the Public Works Act with no agreement from the Trust Board. All trustees listed on the agreement need to sign to make a legal document. Peter Jones – Regent Law – Is called on speaker phone to clarify the Trust position around signing. Peter stated that the Easement has to be registered against the title of land. All the Trustees named on the title need to sign the agreement so that it can be registered against the title...

2. Findlay v Auckland City Council [pdf, 108 KB]

   IN THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL TRI 2008-100-000034 BETWEEN LEE FINDLAY AND MICHAEL ARNE SANDELIN as Trustees for LEE FINDLAY FAMILY TRUST Claimant AND AUCKLAND CITY COUNCIL First Respondent AND ROY STANLEY SLATER Second Respondent Hearing: 27, 28, 29 July 2009 and 26 August 2009 Counsel Appearances: E St John, counsel for claimants. D Heaney SC and S Mitchell, counsel for first respondent. M Frogley, counsel for second respondent. Appearanc

3. [2021] NZACC 102 – Broad v ACC (16 November 2021) [pdf, 632 KB]

   ...not achieve a desired result.2This case is an example of that. [89] Counsel also refers to the lack of contemporaneous evidence supporting bowel symptoms in the first two years after the birth (despite multiple interim contacts with the health service affording the opportunity to raise this). Accordingly, counsel submits that there may have been a gradual deterioration in the appellant’s condition which would not support a treatment injury in 2007. Decision [90] The appellant...

4. [2015] NZEmpC 57 Q v Commissioner of Police [pdf, 719 KB]

   Q v THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE NZEmpC CHRISTCHURCH [2015] NZEmpC 57 [7 May 2015] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT CHRISTCHURCH [2015] NZEmpC 57 CRC 8/13 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN Q Plaintiff AND THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE Defendant Hearing: (26-30 January, 2-5 and 12-13 February 2015) (heard at Christchurch) Appearances: A Shaw, J Behrnes and M Dutkiewicz, co

5. [2014] NZEmpC 231 Premier Events Group Ltd and Anor v Beattie and Ors [pdf, 685 KB]

   ...of “management fees” paid to other entities in which Mr Gill had interests. [36] Mr Beattie claims that his losses resulting from those breaches include a reduction in remuneration, loss of bonuses, and not being “rewarded fairly for his services”. He claims that PEGL’s breaches were deliberate, serious and sustained, or alternatively were intended to undermine the parties’ employment relationship. [37] Remedies sought by Mr Beattie for these causes of action include...

6. [2023] NZEnvC 156 The Bears Home Project Management Limited v Auckland Council [pdf, 3.7 MB]

   The Bears Home Project Management Limited v Auckland Council IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI TĀMAKI MAKAURAU Decision [2023] NZEnvC 156 IN THE MATTER OF an appeal under section 120 the Resource Management Act 1991 BETWEEN THE BEARS HOME PROJECT MANAGEMENT LIMITED (ENV-2023-AKL-000017) Appellant AND AUCKLAND COUNCIL Respondent AND NGĀ MAUNGA WHAKAHII O KAIPARA DEVELOPMENT TRUST Section 274 party Court: Judge J A Smi

7. Chapman v Aotearoa Resorts Ltd - Tokaanu Māori Township 2nd Residue Trust (2010) 257 Aotea MB 62 (257 AOT 62) [pdf, 245 KB]

   CHAPMAN V AOTEAROA RESORT LIMITED MLC A20080018680 4 October 2010 IN THE MAORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AOTEA DISTRICT 257 AOTEA MB 62 (257 AOT 62) A20080018680 UNDER Sections 19 and 21 of Te Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Tokaanu Maori Township 2nd Residue Trust BETWEEN DICKSON ELLIS CHAPMAN, HOKOWHITUATU DUNCAN CORMAC MCKENZIE, MARTIN (MARTENE) BIDDLE, VERA TEIWERA COOK AND WIREMU TEKEREHI JOHN MARIU Applicants AND AOTEAROA RESORTS LIMITED F

8. Hipango v Peehi - Atihau-Whanganui Incorporation (2008) 221 Aotea MB 152 (221 AOT 152) [pdf, 11 MB]

   ...unworkable, at paragraph 34: 221 Aotea MB 159 "The subcommittees began to take 011 their roles however the tensions within the Farm Operations Subcommittee never really dissipated. One of the problems J observed was that it never met. There were phone calls and ema/is and a confusion of roles between the aUlhority of the sub-committee and Ihe Chairman in relalion 10 Ihe FOM grelV. The Chairman was the dally boss of the FOM Sub·committee members allen lVanted to interfere with t...

9. [2018] NZEnvC 237 View West Limited v Auckland Council [pdf, 2 MB]

   BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO 0 AOTEAROA IN THE MATTER AND BETWEEN AND Decision No. [2018] NZEnvC 237 of the Resource Management Act 1991 (the Act) of an appeal pursuant to s 120 of the Act VIEW WEST LIMITED Appellant (ENV-2017-AKL-0001S1) AUCKLAND COUNCIL Respondent Court: Environment Judge J A Smith Environment Commissioner ACE Leijnen Environment Commissioner W R Howie K G Stevenson (Special Advisor) Hearing: at Auckland 26-30 November

10. [2021] NZEnvC 175 Shaw v Hamilton City Council [pdf, 2.5 MB]

    1 SHAW v HAMILTON CITY COUNCIL IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI TĀMAKI MAKAURAU Decision [2021] NZEnvC 175 IN THE MATTER of objections under Section 23 of the Public Works Act 1981 BETWEEN MURRAY NELSON SHAW AND MARGARET EVELYN SHAW (ENV-2019-AKL-000316) Objectors AND HAMILTON CITY COUNCIL Respondent Court: Environment Judge M J L Dickey Commissioner J A Hodges Commissioner R M Bartlett Hearing: at