1368 items matching your search terms
LYNETTE SALLY O’BOYLE v JANIS MARY MCCUE [2020] NZEmpC 175 [29 October 2020] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2020] NZEmpC 175 EMPC 464/2019 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN LYNETTE SALLY O’BOYLE First Plaintiff AND O’BOYLE LAW LIMITED Second Plaintiff AND JANIS MARY MCCUE Defendan
Directory of Official Information Listings A-C Author Version number Date About This is a living document; we endeavour to update it whenever there are changes to be made. If your department or agency’s information is out of date, please email official.correspondence@justice.govt.nz with the necessary amendments –we can send you a MS Word version if you need. official.correspondence@justice.govt.nz Ministerial Services Strategy, Governance &
Justice Centre | 19 Aitken Street DX SX10088 | Wellington T 04 918 8800 | F 04 918 8820 ContactUs@justice.govt.nz | www.justice.govt.nz 7 May 2025 Ref: OIA 120744 Tēnā koe Official Information Act request: Documents listed in reply to Written Parliamentary Question (WPQ) 11636 (2025) Thank you for your email of 26 March 2025, requesting various documents under the Official Information Act 1982 (the Act), listed in response to WPQ 11636 (2025). Specifically, you req
BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT AUCKLAND ENV-2015-AKL-000134 ENV-2015-AKL-000140 ENV-2015-AKL-000141 BETWEEN MOTITI ROHE MOANA TRUST (ENV-2015-AKL-000134) NGĀTI MAKINO HERITAGE TRUST (ENV-2015-AKL-000140) NGĀTI RANGINUI IWI SOCIETY INCORPORATED (ENV-2015-AKL-000141) Appellants AND BAY OF PLENTY REGIONAL COUNCIL Respondent Hearing Commenced: 27 November 2017 held in Courtroom MERK w003 Court: Judge J Smith Judge D Kirkpatrick Commissioner K Prime
Justice Centre | 19 Aitken Street DX SX10088 | Wellington T 04 918 8800 | F 04 918 8820 ContactUs@justice.govt.nz | www.justice.govt.nz 19 September 2022 Our ref: OIA 97846 Tēnā koe Official Information Act request: non-discrimination in the Human Rights Act Thank you for your email of 23 July 2022, requesting, under the Official Information Act 1982 (the Act), documents regarding non-discrimination in the Human Rights Act. Specifically, you requested: “…all infor
...individuals or companies. Due diligence is also vital when considering potential targets of mergers and acquisitions.16 This highlights the need for risk-based due diligence procedures in both the hiring and continued monitoring of third parties, to check the level of risk associated with them. It also demonstrates the importance of ensuring third parties are aware of your organisation’s anti-corruption compliance procedures, and in appropriate circumstances, making it a contractua...
...a report to the Court on the applicant’s suitability in most adoption cases. Supporting information about the applicants will be used in preparing the report. This includes proof of identity, immigration status, residency and/or citizenship, police and care and protection vetting, medical reports, referee checks and residential addresses. When an adoption application gets to court, the Court considers the report and other relevant factors when deciding whether the adoptive applic...
...directions and expectations. Recent requests from Audit NZ for information regarding exit payments has highlighted that the PCP must proactively ensure NZDF if there was uncertainty as to its application, Ms Darnley could and should have checked before proceeding to pay an additional five months’ salary in lieu of notice. [110] Accordingly, I consider that she has contributed to her situation; and a reduction of 10 per cent is appropriate. [111] Accordingly, Ms Darnley...
...the application had been received by Immigration NZ on 1 February 2019 and it would take around six to eight months to allocate, so the case was still within the general processing timeframe. They regularly followed it up with Immigration NZ to check its status but no officer had been assigned. [24] On 20 August 2019, the complainant informed Ms X that she had become a permanent assistant team leader. [25] It is clear from Ursacorp’s file notes that the complainant was regula...
...said you could for the clients or they will surely turn on you.” 2.4 In a letter dated 13 May 2010 to the Solicitor he made allegations of incompetence against the Barrister and against the Junior Barristers, saying: “I hope that you have checked that the barristers you engaged carry sufficient PI insurance. Do not for a moment think that we could just take on anything, collect the fees and if anything goes wrong, that we can rely on PI insurance. Once a claim is made and paid...