Search Results

1. Grants-Handbook-v4.88.pdf [pdf, 1.2 MB]

   ...ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNALS/JUDICIAL AUTHORITIES ARE NOT ELIGIBLE: • United Nations Human Rights Committee • Arbitration proceedings • Disputes Tribunal • District Law Society Costs Revision Committees • Medical Council • Independent Police Conduct Authority • Psychologists’ Professional Conduct Committee Proceedings which may be eligible under s 7(4) of the Act Under s 7(4) of the Act legal aid is not available for proceedings under Part 4 of the Family Proceedings Ac...

2. Grants-Handbook-v5.pdf [pdf, 1.8 MB]

   ...ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNALS/JUDICIAL AUTHORITIES ARE NOT ELIGIBLE: • United Nations Human Rights Committee • Arbitration proceedings • Disputes Tribunal • District Law Society Costs Revision Committees • Medical Council • Independent Police Conduct Authority • Psychologists’ Professional Conduct Committee Proceedings which may be eligible under s 7(4) of the Act Under s 7(4) of the Act legal aid is not available for proceedings under Part 4 of the Family Proce...

3. Grants Handbook v4.89 [pdf, 1.1 MB]

   ...ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNALS/JUDICIAL AUTHORITIES ARE NOT ELIGIBLE: • United Nations Human Rights Committee • Arbitration proceedings • Disputes Tribunal • District Law Society Costs Revision Committees • Medical Council • Independent Police Conduct Authority • Psychologists’ Professional Conduct Committee Proceedings which may be eligible under s 7(4) of the Act Under s 7(4) of the Act legal aid is not available for proceedings under Part 4 of the Family Proceed...

4. Grants Handbook v4.92.pdf [pdf, 1.8 MB]

   ...ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNALS/JUDICIAL AUTHORITIES ARE NOT ELIGIBLE: • United Nations Human Rights Committee • Arbitration proceedings • Disputes Tribunal • District Law Society Costs Revision Committees • Medical Council • Independent Police Conduct Authority • Psychologists’ Professional Conduct Committee Proceedings which may be eligible under s 7(4) of the Act Under s 7(4) of the Act legal aid is not available for proceedings under Part 4 of the Family Proce...

5. 2023-09-04-O2NL-Conditions-Mediation-Version-tracked.pdf [pdf, 2.1 MB]

   Ōtaki to north of Levin Highway Project DRAFT CONDITIONS: MEDIATION (TRACKED) 1 DRAFT CONDITIONS [MEDIATION VERSION (TRACKED)] Drafting notes: The base document of the attached draft conditions is the clean evidence version of A McLeod that includes: - Amendments made through witness conferencing (appended to the JWS of the planners and the JWS of the water abstraction and planners). These amendments are shown in red underline and red strikethrough. - Amendments agreed or p

6. 2023-09-27-SOE_Mark-St-Clair_Planning-+-Attachments.pdf [pdf, 2.4 MB]

   IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT WELLINGTON REGISTRY I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA ROHE ENV-2023-WLG-000005 UNDER the Resource Management Act 1991 IN THE MATTER the direct referral of applications for resource consents and notices of requirement under sections 87G and 198E of the Act for the Ōtaki to North of Levin Project BY WAKA KOTAHI NEW ZEALAND TRANSPORT AGENCY Applicant STATEMENT OF EVIDENCE OF MARK LESLIE ST CLAIR ON BEHALF OF

7. Research report: Without notice applications in the Family Court [pdf, 1.7 MB]

   ...laid bare 15 in the forms for someone else to read. And it’s emotional because it’s important … and so you’re stressed to the max. (Court applicant) • Emotions often run high, and a lawyer helps to keep their emotions in check and manage the process professionally. I’ve always opted for a lawyer. You need to take the emotion out of it and not let things get out of hand … and a lawyer’s trained to do that. (Court applicant) So for me, a lawyer takes t...

8. [2022] NZEnvC 075 Otago Regional Council v Queenstown Lakes District Council [pdf, 27 MB]

   OTAGO REGIONAL COUNCIL V QUEENSTOWN LAKES DISTRICT COUNCIL – CONSENT ORDER IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI ŌTAUTAHI Decision No. [2022] NZEnvC 75 IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND an appeal under s120 of the Act BETWEEN OTAGO REGIONAL COUNCIL (ENV-2021-CHC-070) Appellant AND QUEENSTOWN LAKES DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondent Environment Judge J J M Hassan – sitting alone under s279 of the Act In Chambers at

9. Darryl Sycamore [pdf, 457 KB]

   In the Environment Court of New Zealand Christchurch Registry ENV-2016-CHC-47 Under the Resource Management Act 1991 (RMA) In the matter of an appeal under section 120 of the RMA Between Blueskin Energy Limited Appellant And Dunedin City Council Respondent Statement of evidence of Darryl Sycamore 24 February 2017 Respondent's solicitors: Michael Garbett Anderson Lloyd Level 10, Otago House, 477 Moray Place, Dunedin 9016 Private Bag 1959,

10. National Standards Committee 1 v Haines [2022] NZLCDT 10 (8 April 2022) [pdf, 551 KB]

    NEW ZEALAND LAWYERS AND CONVEYANCERS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2022] NZLCDT 10 LCDT 023/20, 013/21, 014/21, 019/21 IN THE MATTER of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 BETWEEN NATIONAL STANDARDS COMMITTEE (No 1) Applicant AND QUENTIN STOBART HAINES Former Practitioner CHAIR Judge D F Clarkson MEMBERS OF TRIBUNAL Mr I Hunt Mr F Pereira MNZM Ms M Scholtens QC Dr D Tulloch HEARING 023/20 on 20 April 2021; resumed on 12 May 2021 HELD AT Wellin