Search Results

1. [2020] NZEmpC 230 Arachchige v Rasier New Zealand Ltd [pdf, 398 KB]

   ...to verify) and not publishers of your ratings and comments, and may remove comments in the event that such comments include obscenities or other objectionable content, include an individual’s name or other personal information, or violate any privacy laws, other applicable laws or Rasier NZ, Uber, or their Affiliates’ content policies. There is no obligation on you or the User to provide ratings or comments nor is there any consequence for not providing a rating. 6. Requireme...

2. Directory of Official Information 2019 M-O [pdf, 513 KB]

   ...–all primary accounting records necessary to keep full and accurate accounts of the Institute's commercial and cultural operations; • Personal Files –individual personal files are held on employees. Such files are protected under the Privacy Act 1993; • files – folders containing correspondence and documents in relation to the operations of the Institute; • Annual Reports to Parliament –the Institute's annual report to Parliament is required to be tabled in th...

3. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights - list of issues 6th report [pdf, 51 KB]

   ...Government Communications Security Bureau and Related Legislation Amendment Bill, taking into account the conclusions of the Human Rights Commission, published in a report to the Prime Minister in July 2013, that the bill would breach the right to privacy in an unbalanced and unjustified manner. 10. Please clarify whether the comments of the Human Rights Commission in the above-mentioned report to the Prime Minister were taken into account in the Telecommunications (Interception Capabil...

4. [2015] NZEmpC 21 Haldemann LLC v Nelson [pdf, 118 KB]

   ...question of what Ms Nelson stated as to referees when applying for employment was relevant to the issue as to whether his communication with ICC was solicited. He also asserted that it is within Ms Nelson’s power to issue a request under the Privacy Act 1993 for relevant documentation from both the above entities. Finally he suggested the Court should also issue an order requiring ICC and/or Enterprise Recruitment to provide relevant documents under r 8.21 of the High Court Rules...

5. CAC 20004 v Mr G [2014] NZREADT 76 [pdf, 38 KB]

   ...purposes, we set out s.108(1) of the Act as follows: “108 Restrictions on publication (1) If the Disciplinary Tribunal is of the opinion that it is proper to do so, having regard to the interest of any person (including (without limitation) the privacy of the complainant (if any)) and to the public interest, it may make 1 or more of the following orders: (a) an order prohibiting the publication of any report or account of any part of any proceedings before it, whether held in p...

6. [2014] NZEmpC 28 Harvery Norman v Boult [pdf, 51 KB]

   ...said: 3.3 From the outset, it was clear that many of Kelvin’s claims were frivolous and/or lacked merit due to either being: a. the subject of a mediated agreement; or b. raised outside of the statutory time limit of 90 days; or c. a breach of privacy claim that did not fall within the Authority’s jurisdiction. [22] Later, she referred again to claims which had been settled and went on to say: 4.9 Kelvin also included a claim for a redundancy compensation payment, which had a...

7. BORA Prisoners' and Victims' Claims Bill [pdf, 194 KB]

   ...of Rights Act 1990 ("BORA"), we have set out the basis of that conclusion below. Introduction 2. The Bill creates specialised schemes for the award and receipt of monetary compensation under the BORA, the Human Rights Act 1993 and the Privacy Act 1993 in respect of claims brought by prison inmates and others subject to control or supervision as a result of a prison sentence ("inmate claims") and for the bringing of civil proceedings against plaintiffs who receive...

8. AX v ZA LCRO 113 / 2010 (18 February 2011) [pdf, 117 KB]

   ...enquiries, the form and extent of which would be a matter for the professional judgment of the practitioner in the circumstances of the case.” This Rule is expressed in the manner of an entitlement to investigate in a manner which does not breach the Privacy Act. It does not create an obligation, and indeed it would be taking a step too far to suggest that where a practitioner has reasonable grounds to doubt the bona fides of a client, that he has an obligation to investigate furth...

9. Cabinet paper relating to Private Security Personnel and Private Investigators (Minimum Training) Amendment Regulations and other legislative instruments [pdf, 1.2 MB]

   ...effect and the remaining amendments will be brought into effect in late 2019. 1e0uwhavt9 2019-05-07 10:54:49RE LE AS ED B Y TH E AS SO CI AT E M IN IS TE R OF JU ST IC E 4 26.3 the principles and guidelines set out in the Privacy Act 1993; 26.4 relevant international standards and obligations; 26.5 the Legislation Guidelines (2018 edition), which are maintained by the Legislation Design and Advisory Committee. Regulations Review Committee 27. There are no...

10. LCRO 193/2019 CF v YL (19 February 2021) [pdf, 134 KB]

    ...prudence and made that suggestion and discussed it in full as well given that she was very much informed about B’s disability because she had a considerable amount of medical notes and certificates on the file outlining the situation and realising the privacy difficulties of communicating with myself (C) on behalf of B. The above comment indicates that a face-to-face meeting with B and myself should have been initiated by her and not B. [13] The Standards Committee identified the iss...