2938 items matching your search terms
1 (1) ORDER PREVENTING SEARCH OF THE TRIBUNAL FILE WITHOUT LEAVE OF THE TRIBUNAL OR OF THE CHAIRPERSON IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2017] NZHRRT 40 Reference No. HRRT 011/2016 UNDER THE PRIVACY ACT 1993 BETWEEN BRIAN GREGORY MULLANE PLAINTIFF AND ATTORNEY-GENERAL DEFENDANT AT WELLINGTON BEFORE: Mr RPG Haines QC, Chairperson Ms DL Hart, Member Ms ST Scott, Member REPRESENTATION: Mr BG Mullane in person...
...issue of the notice, Mr Fehling sought the names of the individuals who had provided the “information” which had caused the notice to be issued. The School declined to provide that information. In proceedings brought by Mr Fehling under the Privacy Act 1993 the Tribunal (differently constituted) found that SWAS had no proper grounds for withholding the information and the refusal was an interference with Mr Fehling’s privacy. Damages of $10,000 were awarded to Mr Fehling. [2] T...
...this guide This guide provides you with information on how to complete and serve a Notice of Proceeding and Letter of Notification. This guide uses the terms plaintiff, defendant, and statement of claim but for certain proceedings under the Privacy Act 2020 these terms should be read as applicant, respondent, and application form as applicable. What is a Notice of Proceeding and Letter of Notification In accordance with regulation12 of the Human Rights Review Tribunal Regulations...
...our website and its services, for example your email address if you sign up to a newsletter. We only use this personal information for the purpose(s) specified at the point of collection. When you do provide information to us, please carefully read the privacy statement provided at that point. Note that any information you provide us with is viewable by site administrators, certain Ministry of Justice staff and contractors (including third parties providing services relating to the administrati...
...preservation direction lasts is only 20 days. In most cases, the direction would have expired before the appeal is heard, undermining the point of the appeal. In most cases the desired remedy will be a lifting of the direction. 26 The Office of the Privacy Commissioner has expressed concerns about these changes, believing that, as the Commissioner of Police is responsible for issuing preservation directions, it is inappropriate for the responsibility for review these directi...
...THEIR CHILDREN (2) ORDER PREVENTING SEARCH OF THE TRIBUNAL FILE WITHOUT LEAVE OF THE TRIBUNAL OR OF THE CHAIRPERSON IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2014] NZHRRT 16 Reference No. HRRT 025/2008 UNDER THE PRIVACY ACT 1993 BETWEEN NOP AND TUV PLAINTIFFS AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE, MINISTRY OF BUSINESS, INNOVATION AND EMPLOYMENT DEFENDANT AT WELLINGTON BEFORE: Mr RPG Haines QC, Chairperson Ms ST Scott, Member Ms M Sinclair, Member...
1 IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2015] NZHRRT 37 Reference No. HRRT 004/2015 UNDER THE PRIVACY ACT 1993 BETWEEN LAWRENCE WAYNE DEEMING PLAINTIFF AND WHANGAREI DISTRICT COUNCIL DEFENDANT AT AUCKLAND BEFORE: Mr RPG Haines QC, Chairperson Ms GJ Goodwin, Member Mr BK Neeson JP, Member REPRESENTATION: Mr LW Deeming in person Ms KE Candy for defendant DATE OF HEARING: On the papers DATE OF DECISION: 26 August...
1 IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2015] NZHRRT 32 Reference No. HRRT 022/2014 UNDER THE PRIVACY ACT 1993 BETWEEN BRETT JAMES TAYLOR PLAINTIFF AND ORCON LIMITED DEFENDANT AT PALMERSTON NORTH BEFORE: Mr RPG Haines QC, Chairperson Mr RK Musuku, Member Hon KL Shirley, Member REPRESENTATION: Ms SN Taylor for plaintiff Mr BR Edwards for defendant DATE OF HEARING: 20 April 2015 DATE OF DECISION: 14 May 2015 DA...
...PARTICULARS OF THE VICTIMS (3) ORDER PREVENTING SEARCH OF THE TRIBUNAL FILE WITHOUT LEAVE OF THE CHAIRPERSON IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2014] NZHRRT 21 Reference No. HRRT 006/2013 UNDER THE PRIVACY ACT 1993 BETWEEN DIRECTOR OF HUMAN RIGHTS PROCEEDINGS PLAINTIFF AND THE SENSIBLE SENTENCING GROUP TRUST DEFENDANT AT AUCKLAND BEFORE: Mr RPG Haines QC, Chairperson Ms GJ Goodwin, Member Ms K Anderson, Member REPR...
...was signed and had failed to provide a list of the prospective purchasers when their agency ended. This amounted to unsatisfactory conduct. The Freears were each censured and fined $3,000. The Committee decided to take no further action on the privacy complaint concerning the photograph and a complaint against the agency for failing to properly supervise Ms Freear. [4] The Lammases appeal to the Tribunal against the Committee’s dismissal of the photography and supervision compl...