Search Results

1. INZ (Calder) v Horan [2019] NZIACDT 13 (11 March 2019) [pdf, 274 KB]

   ...clients’ consent and he was asked to provide his clients’ authority for such disclosure. Mr Horan responded in an email to Mr W (verbatim):13 Now, Mr [W] if I ever need you to advise me that you may consider that I may have breached my client’s privacy in regards to my having included another professional Licensed Immigration Adviser or a lawyer or any other individual then I will let you know. However if you feel that your inference of my having done anything untoward has subs...

2. [2019] NZEnvC 090 Saville v Queenstown Lakes District Council [pdf, 4.9 MB]

   ...(viii) Avoid potentiat land uses and land management practices, which create unacceptable or significant conflict with neighbouring land-based activities , including adjoining urban areas. (ix) Maintenance of a level of rurat amenity, including privacy, rural outlook, spaciousness, ease of access and quietness, consistent with the range of permitted rural activities in the lone . (x) Retention of the amenities, quality and character of the different rurat environments within the D...

3. [2021] NZREADT 06 - Silcock (22 January 2021) [pdf, 309 KB]

   ...Silcock’s complaint [19] Ms Silcock complained to Ms Coombes, copied to Mr Foster, (the compliance manager at the Agency) on 7 August 2019. She was told that the prospective purchasers had cancelled the appointment to view the property, but for privacy reasons, was not given copies of any communications from the prospective purchasers to establish that. [20] In her complaint to the Authority, Ms Silcock said that Mr Watson “failed to bring buyers through when he had prior...

4. [2021] NZEnvC 018 Hadley v Waterfall Park Developments Limited [pdf, 1.5 MB]

   ...July 2020 at (33). CS Meehan affidavit sworn 10 July 2020 at [44) and [46]. B Gilbert affidavit sworn 31 July 2020 at (44]. 12 mature trees". As such, she says the Planting does not offer any wind protection, visual screening, and/ or privacy to that dwelling.43 [29] QLDC's planner, Ms Standish, accepts Mr Meehan's evidence that the Site is being used for production and livestock purposes and that the primary present use of the Site is farming. However, she does n...

5. Wang v Real Estate Agents Authority (CAC 409) v Sweetingham [2017] NZREADT 29 [pdf, 274 KB]

   ...did not disclose the true rear boundary of the property, and allowed her to think that the boundary was at the wooden fence. She said that as a result, she lost 2.2 metres of her deck, and 5.8 metres of lawn frontage. Further, she lost a lot of privacy. [b] Ms Wang did not disclose to her that the cycleway was about to be built on the adjoining land. She said that the disruption from construction of the cycleway was almost intolerable, as it involved diggers and tractors shakin...

6. INZ (Foley) v De'Ath [2018] NZIACDT 44 (6 November 2018) [pdf, 273 KB]

   ...with you to discuss what level of reprimand you are willing to give [Ms X] for the blatant non adherence to her contracted role, for this you would of course need to seek [Ms X’s] permission to do this, and discuss such subject matter, in light of privacy law. I am more than willing for [Ms X] to attend the same meeting. I see such an offer as a fair middle of the road. My position is that there must be accountability, not lip service, not assurances of internal discussions and revi...

7. Proposed model for establishing a Criminal Cases Review Commission - Redacted [pdf, 282 KB]

   ...requirement for the CCRC to make available its reasons for declining an application publicly available. While the level of detail and need for appropriate redactions would necessarily vary according to the details of the case and reasonable expectations of privacy, proactive publication would enable scrutiny of the CCRC’s process and application of the test for referral. This would, in turn, promote confidence in the CCRC’s work or, at least, identify possible issues early should the...

8. Auckland Standards Committee 1 v Fendall [2018] NZLCDT 26 [pdf, 349 KB]

   ...12 [57] Secondly, as to her suggestion that she told health professionals and claims managers that she was working16. [58] There is no need to traverse the medical evidence in any further detail and indeed this accords with the privacy rights of the practitioner. B. Admissions Made to the Insurance Company [59] Counsel for Ms Fendall urges us to treat these admissions with some caution. She submits that at the time of the interview Ms Fendall was still suffering f...

9. [2022] NZREADT 23 - CAC 1904 v Bright (8 November 2022) [pdf, 278 KB]

   ...submissions are to be filed and served by 21 December 2022. [92] Pursuant to s 113 of the Act, the Tribunal draws the parties’ attention to s 116, setting out the right of appeal to the High Court. PUBLICATION [93] Having regard to the privacy of the complainant and the interests of the public, it is appropriate to order publication of this decision without identifying the complainant.18 ___________________ D J Plunkett Chair ___________________ G J Denley...

10. Incitement-of-Hatred-Hate-Crime-and-Discrimination_FINAL.pdf [pdf, 559 KB]

    ...complies with the following: 8.1 the principles of the Treaty of Waitangi; 8.2 the disclosure statement requirements (a draft disclosure statement prepared by the Ministry of Justice is attached); 8.3 the principles and guidelines set out in the Privacy Act 2020; 8.4 relevant international standards and obligations – the change will improve Aotearoa New Zealand’s alignment with the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights that we are party to. 8.5 the...