Search Results

1. Te Manutukutuku Issue 29 [pdf, 9 MB]

   ...Tauranga, then studied French at Auck­ land university before heading off overseas where he cycled round parts of Europe and travelled in Africa. He returned to complete an Bachelor of Law degree at Victoria University, and has since worked in the Privacy Commission­ er's Office and at the Treaty of Waitangi Policy Unit in the Department of Justice (TOWPU) as a policy analyst on a legal­ historical project. Geoff's work will include legal research, registration and claim...

2. Marshall v Ratu - Whangape Lot 65B Sec 2A Block (2021) 227 Waikato Maniapoto MB 148 (227 WMN 148) [pdf, 400 KB]

   ...considers that the steps taken in mitigation are not reasonable, the trespasser must show why that is the case. All the circumstances of the case are relevant in assessing reasonableness. (f) General damages may be awarded for interference with privacy and quiet enjoyment of land, and for distress and anxiety caused by the intrusion. (g) Aggravated damages may be awarded in the case of deliberate trespass in arrogant disregard for ownership rights. Exemplary damages may be awarde...

3. Kahukura methamphetamine rehabilitation initiative documents [pdf, 9.8 MB]

   ...racism and trauma, varying comfort with written assessments/interview situations, and time taken to gain rapport. Ethics – compliance with accepted ethical principles and practices, with particular regard to issues such as past trauma, suspicion, privacy concerns, literacy issues. Design: the evaluation needs sufficient flexibility to manage the inevitable changes as the program evolves, and new questions that emerge. Value: It must provide sufficiently robust data to satisfy stakeh...

4. Auckland Standards Committee 2 v Holland [2022] NZLCDT 9 (3 March 2022) [pdf, 216 KB]

   ...whether or not she disputed it. [57] When asked by her brother, Ms Holland ignored or fobbed off his requests. We find his requests were proper requests. She adopted the view that he was not entitled to the information, suggesting her sister’s privacy precluded his being told.40 We are unaware what sensitivity she alludes to, and how this would apply to co- executors. [58] It appears as if Ms Holland took the approach that she would undertake the care of her mother in place of...

5. [2022] NZEmpC 171 Alkazaz v Deloitte (No. 3) Ltd [pdf, 356 KB]

   ...applications. He considers that the email from Mr Wong jeopardised his prospects of finding employment in New Zealand. Mr AlKazaz says he became aware of the email when it was sent to him some time in May 2018 in response to a request under the Privacy Act 1993 made to Mr Scholtz in March 2018. 29 Mr Enderby had read media coverage (three articles) of Mr AlKazaz’s success in the Employment Relations Authority against Enterprise IT, including interviews with Mr AlKazaz. 30 Nad...

6. Proactive-Release-Coroners-Amendment-Bill-FINAL.pdf [pdf, 1.7 MB]

   ...contained in the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990 and the Human Rights Act 1993; 16.3 the disclosure statement requirements (a disclosure statement prepared by the Ministry of Justice is attached); 16.4 the principles and guidelines set out in the Privacy Act 2020; 16.5 relevant international standards and obligations; and 16.6 the Legislation Guidelines (2021 edition), which are maintained by the Legislation Design and Advisory Committee. 3 Section 109 of the Coroners Act provi...

7. [2022] NZEnvC 135 Timu v Queenstown Lakes District Council [pdf, 4.9 MB]

   TIMU & SIMMERS v QLDC – CONSENT ORDER IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI ŌTAUTAHI Decision No. [2022] NZEnvC 135 IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND an appeal under s120 of the Act BETWEEN J K TIMU, K M TIMU & H D SIMMERS (ENV-2021-CHC-100) Appellants AND QUEENSTOWN LAKES DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondent Environment Judge J J M Hassan – sitting alone under s279 of the Act In Chambers at Christchurch D

8. [2022] NZEmpC 48 E Tu Inc v Mount Cook Airline Ltd [pdf, 314 KB]

   ...was needed by a resident, could not drink alcohol, could not have visitors without prior permission and was not to disturb the residents during the night. During the sleepover he could only engage in a limited range of other activities and his privacy was limited. The Court considered that those constraints pointed towards the sleepover being work. [23] The other two factors assessed by the Court also supported the conclusion that the sleepover was work. The Court considered that...

9. [2023] NZREADT 2 - Wilson and Wilson v Registrar of the REAA (26 January 2023) [pdf, 222 KB]

   ...licensee. In particular, the applicants say they should have been provided with the emails between the licensee and the vendors. It is submitted by the Registrar that the applicants’ natural justice rights must be weighed against the countervailing privacy interests of other parties, such as the licensee and vendors. It would also be contrary to the purpose of the Act to require broad disclosure of private and confidential communications in response to complaints such as those...

10. LCRO 71/2022 OM v NT (22 July 2024) [pdf, 239 KB]

    LEGAL COMPLAINTS REVIEW OFFICER ĀPIHA AROTAKE AMUAMU Ā-TURE [2024] NZLCRO 093 Ref: LCRO 71/2022 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a decision of the [Area] Standards Committee [X] BETWEEN OM Applicant AND NT Respondent The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed DECISION Introduction [1] The applica