3009 items matching your search terms
1 IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2022] NZHRRT 6 I TE TARAIPIUNARA MANA TANGATA Reference No. HRRT 024/2016 UNDER THE PRIVACY ACT 2020 BETWEEN YAN GUO PLAINTIFF AND PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS DEFENDANT AT WELLINGTON BEFORE: Mr RPG Haines ONZM QC, Chairperson REPRESENTATION: Ms Y Guo in person assisted by Ms Li Yan (her mother) as McKenzie friend Mr TL Clarke for defendant DATE OF HEARING: Heard on the papers...
Reference No. HRRT 035/2017 UNDER THE PRIVACY ACT 2020 BETWEEN KARL NUKU PLAINTIFF AND COMMISSIONER OF POLICE DEFENDANT AT Wellington BEFORE: Ms MG Coleman, Deputy Chairperson Dr SJ Hickey MNZM, Member Ms NJ Baird, Member REPRESENTATION: Mr K Nuku on his own behalf Ms K Laurenson and Mr G Taylor for defendant DATE OF HEARING: On the papers DATE OF DECISION: 19 January 2023 DECISION OF TRIBUNAL STRIKING OUT CLAIM1 BACKGROUND [1]...
1 IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2018] NZHRRT 25 Reference No. HRRT 025/2016 UNDER THE PRIVACY ACT 1993 BETWEEN YAN GUO PLAINTIFF AND STEPHEN JAMES CULPAN DEFENDANT AT AUCKLAND BEFORE: Ms MA Roche, Co-Chairperson Dr SJ Hickey MNZM, Member Mr RK Musuku, Member REPRESENTATION: Ms Yan Guo in person Ms HC Stuart for defendant DATE OF HEARING: 14 May 2018 DATE OF DECISION: 19 June 2018 DECISION OF TRIBUNAL...
Reference No. HRRT 066/2017 UNDER THE PRIVACY ACT 2020 BETWEEN ALISHA MARIE COOK PLAINTIFF AND MANAWATU COMMUNITY LAW CENTRE DEFENDANT AT WELLINGTON BEFORE: Ms GJ Goodwin, Deputy Chairperson Mr MJM Keefe QSM JP, Member Sir RK Workman KNZM QSO, Member REPRESENTATION: Ms R Oakley for plaintiff Ms N Flint for defendant Mr J Goddard for Ms Abraham as second defendant (removed) DATE OF HEARING: Heard on the papers DATE OF DECISION: 20 December...
1 IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2020] NZHRRT 1 Reference No. HRRT 047/2017 UNDER THE PRIVACY ACT 1993 BETWEEN MARTYN BRADBURY PLAINTIFF AND NEW ZEALAND POLICE DEFENDANT AT WELLINGTON BEFORE: Mr RPG Haines ONZM QC, Chairperson Ms GJ Goodwin, Deputy Chairperson Ms DL Hart, Member Ms ST Scott QSM, Member REPRESENTATION: Mr G Edgeler for plaintiff Ms V McCall and Ms A Lawson for defendant DATE OF HEARIN...
...proceedings without the disclosure of any more information about the private lives of individuals, or matters that are commercially sensitive, than is necessary to satisfy the principle of open justice: (d) the protection of other confidentiality and privacy interests (including those of children and other vulnerable members of the community) and any privilege held by, or available to, any person: (e) the principle of open justice (including the encouragement of fair and accurate rep...
...queryme@police.govt.nz. http://www.familyviolenceconference.nz/ http://www.familyviolenceconference.nz/index.php/news-updates http://www.familyviolenceconference.nz/index.php/news-updates mailto:conference@nnsvs.org.nz mailto:queryme@police.govt.nz. Privacy Assessments As you are aware, the Privacy Act 2020 requires providers to complete an annual data security self- assessment checklist. This checklist is to help you meet the Privacy Act requirements and better understan...
...provide evidence that you have made a complaint to the Human Rights Commission. If you’ve complained to the Human Rights Commission and still want to make a claim to the Tribunal, fill in this form and return it to us: Statement of Claim – Human Rights Act 1993 Privacy Act 2020 If you’re making a claim under the Privacy Act 2020: you must first provide evidence that you have made a complaint to the Privacy Commissioner and a notice under section 98 of the Act must have been issued b...
...Section (9)(2)(a) Tena ko0U.'il - j Justice Centre I 19 Aitken St reet DX SX10088 I Wellington T 04 918 8800 I F 04 918 8820 contactus@just ice.govt.nz I www.j ustice.govt.nz Our ref: OIA 99219 Official Information Act 1982 request: Privacy Act 2020: Prioritising countries for overseas disclosures Thank you for your email of 10 September 2022, requesting under the Official Information Act 1982 (the Act), information on countries prioritised for assessment by Office of the...
...circumstances that would allow one to be granted. [79] The challenge to the Authority’s determination on the preliminary issue is unsuccessful. The unjustified dismissal claim [80] The DHB summarily dismissed Ms Shaw for breaching its privacy policy relating to confidential patient records. There was no dispute that during her employment Ms Shaw collected those records and retained them. [81] Ms Shaw explained to the DHB, and acknowledged in her statement of claim...