Search Results

1. Hammond v Credit Union Baywide (Admissability of Opinion Evidence) [2014] NZHRRT 57 [pdf, 54 KB]

   1 IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2014] NZHRRT 57 Reference No. HRRT 027/2013 UNDER THE PRIVACY ACT 1993 BETWEEN KAREN MAY HAMMOND PLAINTIFF AND CREDIT UNION BAYWIDE DEFENDANT AT NAPIER BEFORE: Mr RPG Haines QC, Chairperson Ms WV Gilchrist, Member Mr BK Neeson JP, Member REPRESENTATION: Ms KM Hammond in person Mr AJ Harris and Mr GJC Ferguson for defendant DATE OF HEARING: 1, 2 and 3 December 2014 (continuing)...

2. 2020 NZEnvC 143 Envrionmental Defence Society Incorporated v New Zealand Aluminium Smelters Limited [pdf, 7.2 MB]

   ...before the court. The parties objected to the disclosure of the application for, and documents filed in support of, the discovery application.6 The parties based their objection on the protection, provided by Rule 13(a), of the confidentiality and privacy interests of parties during early stages of proceedings.7 [9] The parties also objected to the disclosure of the application for, and supporting memorandum relating to confidentiality orders made in respect of the TAHA Agreement....

3. Anti-Money Laundering and Countering Financing of Terrorism - Cabinet Paper 4 - March 17 [pdf, 241 KB]

   ...implementation by introducing a supervisory regime. Submissions from the New Zealand Law Society and the legal sector broadly supported the proposed provision. 36.2. Proposed information-sharing provisions: concerns may be raised with the privacy implications of enabling greater information-sharing between government agencies, regulators and the private sector. The information sharing amendments are intended to contain sufficient safeguards and strike an appropriate bal...

4. What is a criminal record

   ...fixed. You can write to us at: CCHonline@justice.govt.nz Correction of wrong information we hold about you You have the right to ask us to correct the information we hold about you if you think it’s wrong. Where your correction request is covered by the Privacy Act 2020, we’ll respond in accordance with your rights under principle 7 of the Privacy Act. If your correction request isn’t covered by the Privacy Act 2020 and we’re unable to make the change(s) you’ve asked for, we’ll let...

   Located in:

   1. Criminal record check

5. BORA Land Transfer (Foreign Ownership of Land Register) Amendment Bill [pdf, 168 KB]

   ...who are not resident in New Zealand. 10. The Bill also proposes a public register, which would require the land owner caught by it to make public their name, their country of origin and the value of their land purchase in New Zealand. The loss of privacy in publicising this information is sufficient to constitute a material disadvantage. 11. I therefore consider cl 4 of the Bill is a prima facie case of discrimination on the grounds of national origins which creates a material disadvan...

6. O'Hagan v Police (Costs) [2020] NZHRRT 28 [pdf, 614 KB]

   ...PROHIBITING PUBLICATION OF THE CONTENTS OF ANY DOCUMENT CONTAINED IN THE COMMON BUNDLE OF DOCUMENTS (2) ORDER PREVENTING SEARCH OF THE TRIBUNAL FILE WITHOUT LEAVE OF THE TRIBUNAL OR OF THE CHAIRPERSON Reference No. HRRT 018/2016 UNDER THE PRIVACY ACT 1993 BETWEEN DAVID ANDREW O’HAGAN PLAINTIFF AND NEW ZEALAND POLICE DEFENDANT AT WELLINGTON BEFORE: Mr RPG Haines QC ONZM, Chairperson Ms DL Hart, Member Hon KL Shirley, Member REPRESENTATION: Mr DA O’Hag...

7. Gangs-Legislation-Amendment-Bill-Escalating-Penalties_FINAL.pdf [pdf, 1.2 MB]

   ...identified that would outweigh the reasons for withholding it. No. Document Comments 1 Gangs Legislation Amendment Bill: Some information has been withheld in Escalating Penalties accordance with section 9(2)(a) to protect the Key Advice: Briefing privacy of natural persons. Office of the Minister of Justice 7 June 2024 2 Table: Comparison of Australian Gang Released in full. Insignia Laws Key Advice: Memo Office of the Minister of Justice 11 June 2024 3 Gangs Legislation Am...

8. Jain v CAC 20007 & Martin [2014] NZREADT 51 [pdf, 55 KB]

   ...appellant made the following legal submissions: (i) The Complaints Assessment Committee failed to give appropriate weight to the personal and professional interests of the appellant in making the order to publish. (ii) They failed to consider the privacy interests of the appellant which should be measured against the public interest. (iii) The finding of unsatisfactory conduct is a severe punishment in itself. Mr Jain recognises he has room to improve. (iv) The publication would be...

9. Guo v PwC (Non-Party Discovery - Oral Hearing) [2020] NZHRRT 51 [pdf, 208 KB]

   1 IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2020] NZHRRT 51 I TE TARAIPIUNARA MANA TANGATA Reference No. HRRT 024/2016 UNDER THE PRIVACY ACT 1993 BETWEEN YAN GUO PLAINTIFF AND PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS DEFENDANT TRIBUNAL: Rodger Haines ONZM QC, Chairperson REPRESENTATION: Ms Y Guo in person assisted by Ms Li Yan (her mother) as McKenzie friend Mr TL Clarke for defendant Ms HC Stuart for CityMed Medical Centre Ltd (non-party)...

10. Bevan-Smith v One New Zealand Group Ltd (Strike Out) [2024] NZHRRT 48 [pdf, 583 KB]

    ...Security Bureau 1 This decision is to be cited as Bevan-Smith v One New Zealand Group Ltd (Strike Out) [2024] NZHRRT 48. IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2024] NZHRRT 48 I TE TARAIPIUNARA MANA TANGATA Reference No. HRRT 043/2022 UNDER THE PRIVACY ACT 2020 BETWEEN JOHN BEVAN-SMITH PLAINTIFF AND ONE NEW ZEALAND GROUP LIMITED (formerly VODAFONE NEW ZEALAND LIMITED) DEFENDANT AT WELLINGTON BEFORE: Ms J Foster, Deputy Chairperson Dr SJ Hickey MNZM, Member Ms EF Tait, Me...