PR v HG 69/2016 LCRO [pdf, 269 KB]
...lawyer wrote to Ms PR. Mr HG says that immediately upon being put on notice that Mr HG would be notifying the NZLS she immediately tried to withdraw part of the claim because she knew she had been caught out without evidence. He links this to the private investigator having been retained to gather evidence and infers Ms PR still had no evidence she could rely on to support the deceit claim.24 [35] Mr HG sent an email to his lawyer on 2 September 2014 referring to enquiries made of...