Search Results

1. Waitangi Tribunal Vol 3 Kāhui Maunga Report [pdf, 13 MB]

   t e K ā h u i M a u n g a Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz t e K ā h u i M a u n g a The National Park District Inquiry Report Volume 3 Waitangi Tribunal Report 2013 Wai 1130 Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz National Library of New Zealand Catalo

2. [2016] NZEmpC 177 Go Bus Transport Ltd v Hellyer [pdf, 421 KB]

   ...defined in s 107 of the Act. 3 The Authority then set out the presumptions in discrimination cases contained in s 119. [9] The Authority concluded: [55] The first reference to Mr Hellyer’s involvement in union activities occurred at the investigation meeting on 12 August 2014 where there was mention of Mr Hellyer being a union delegate and in that role of all people you know you can’t allow passengers to travel for free. There was discussion at that meeting about Mr Hell...

3. [2021] NZEnvC 106 Rangitane o Tamaki Nui a Rua Incorporated v Manawatu-Wanganui Regional Council [pdf, 861 KB]

   ...Holder shall install and thereafter maintain signage at the following locations: d. Approximately 300m upstream of the discharge location; e. Approximately 500m downstream of the discharge location. G9. The Consent Holder shall commence an investigation into alternative methods and treatment and discharge (Alternatives Investigation) on or before five years from the expiry of these consents (discharge permits). The Alternatives Investigation shall be undertaken in consultation...

4. LCRO 22/2025 MG and SG v LB (26 September 2025) [pdf, 349 KB]

   ...Society Complaints Service (NZLS) on 7 June 2023. [38] The complaint initially filed included complaints made against the lawyer who had represented [Company A]. Understandably, the Complaints Service separated the complaints, and proceeded its investigations against the two practitioners as stand- alone inquiries. [39] The substance of the complaint against Mr LB was that: (a) Mr LB had added to the fee charged for the High Court appeal, the $20,000 that had been agreed would b...

5. Lachlan Paul Graham JONES (CSU-2019-DUN-000038) [pdf, 2.3 MB]

   ...Fairley S A McClean for Gore District Council Findings: 13 June 2025 INQUEST FINDINGS OF CORONER HO Contents Paragraph I. Introduction [1] II. Jurisdiction, proof and fact-finding [13] The coronial jurisdiction [13] Coronial investigations and role of the police [18] Standard of proof [22] Approach to fact finding [29] III. Background [50] Lachie and his family [50] Salford Street and the ponds [56] Ms Officer’s account of events [64] 2 Search and...

6. Zagorski v Wilkinson Building and Construction Limited [2012] NZWHT Auckland 4 [pdf, 234 KB]

   ...Geoffrey Bayley, the Council‟s expert, Clint Smith and the expert for Mr Holyoake and Hitex, Alan Light, gave their evidence concurrently on the defects that allowed moisture ingress. [20] Mr Angell made two site visits to the house. His investigation included visual assessment, taking moisture readings and carrying out invasive and destructive investigation. He also sent timber samples for laboratory analysis. Mr Maiden visited the site on three occasions and carried ou...

7. [2015] NZEmpC 208 Caffe Coffee (NZ) Ltd v Farrimond interlocutory [pdf, 130 KB]

   ...previous position, and in particular the agreement to produce an electronic record as recorded in the consent memorandum. Mr Alford asserted that Mr Farrimond would be aware that most, if not all, customers of Caffe Coffee are contacted through private mobile phone numbers which are not readily available in the public domain. He said that the true position as to the information which should have been provided under the consent memorandum is now unclear. [35] The Court is not in...

8. Perkinson v CAC 10040 & Cooper & Le Mac [2011] NZREADT 32 [pdf, 116 KB]

   ...[i.e. Mr and Mrs Perkinson] personally. 2.7 Mr Cooper responded to the CAC by letter of the 19th July 2010. He advised he had initial discussions with the complainants in which a refund of the commission was discussed but that following his investigation into the matter he discovered the complainants had not been as disadvantaged as they had made out. 2.8 Mr Cooper provided to the CAC a letter from Mr John Vincent the tenant who ultimately purchased the unit who advises that...

9. [2014] NZEmpC 201 Dunn v Waitemata DHB [pdf, 128 KB]

   ...to work, at some unidentified time in the future, there is a risk that it will be accused of pursuing a stale complaint. In the event no concerns, including in relation to the fact that the letter was sent to the plaintiff personally by way of private and confidential correspondence, were raised at the time. In the circumstances, and having regard to the way in which the letter was crafted, I do not accept the plaintiff’s criticisms. [36] It was submitted that the WDHB ough...

10. Nimick & Anor v CAC 20005 & Ors [2014] NZREADT 11 [pdf, 116 KB]

    ...decisions will apply; see Smith v CAC [2010] NZREADT 13 (appeal from discretionary decision under s.80) and Dunn v REAA (CAC 143) [2012] NZREADT 56 (appeal from decision not to refer a misconduct charge). [45] In this case, the Committee conducted an investigation and hearing on the papers, carefully weighed the issues and the evidence and determined to take no further action. In the circumstances, we agree with Mr Clancy, as counsel for the Authority, that the present appeal is a gener...