Search Results

1. OX v QT Ltd [2021] NZDT 1671 (16 August 2021) [pdf, 95 KB]

   ...The Tribunal orders: 1. OX is not liable to pay $288.75 or any further sum to QT Ltd. 2. OX’s claim for the filing fee is dismissed. Reasons 1. On 24 February 2021 OX instructed his son, who was driving his vehicle, to park in a private car park at [the parking building]. On 31 March he received a reminder from QT that he had not paid a breach fee of $95.00 under a breach notice dated 26 February 2021. The reminder sought a payment of $170.00, consisting of a breach fee...

2. RIS Criminal Cases Review Commission [pdf, 497 KB]

   ...Proposed Approach How will Government intervention work to bring about the desired change? How is this the best option? The proposed approach is to establish a Criminal Cases Review Commission (“CCRC”) an independent public body set up to investigate suspected miscarriages of justice and refer deserving cases back to the appeal courts. The CCRC would replace the referral function currently performed by the Governor- General as part of the RPM, under section 406 of the Crime...

3. NL v BU Ltd [2021] NZDT 1565 (28 July 2021) [pdf, 176 KB]

   ...from going ahead. 4. The issues to be determined are as follows: a. Was BU Ltd entitled to tow NL’s car? b. If so, was the fee charged by BU Ltd reasonable? Was BU Ltd entitled to tow NL’s car? 5. The parking space NL parked in was on private property and is allocated to another business, not the DG gym she was visiting. A private landlord or tenant is entitled to manage who parks on its land, at all times. However, tow companies must have authority from the land owner or l...

4. E v G [2023] NZDT 32 (10 February 2023).pdf [pdf, 209 KB]

   ...he says is uneconomic to do and, in any event, no parts are available. 3. E claims $8500.00, being a refund of the purchase price and $500.00 for the [motor company] bill. 4. The issues to be determined are: • Did G sell the engine as a private sale or ‘in trade’? • Was the contract conditional on the engine being in running order? • Did G misrepresent the engine? Did G sell the engine as a private sale or ‘in trade’? 5. I find that the transaction betwee...

5. JT v Q Ltd [2024] NZDT 227 (24 February 2024) [pdf, 91 KB]

   ...law of trespass applies to this claim. Parking on another person’s land is deemed trespass if the person parking does not have the authority of the land occupier. 6. Q Ltd through their communication with JT inform that the parking space is the private property of KX Ltd. There is no clear evidence from the communication that the car park clearly identifies that the car park is the property of KX Ltd. Without this information I cannot be satisfied that the property is in fact private p...

6. Disqualifying Criteria

   Disqualifying Criteria The Private Security Personnel and Private Investigators Act 2010 (the Act) lists the types of things that may disqualify a person from being granted a certificate of approval or licence or from being an officer[1] of a company licence holder. Section 63 of the Act outlines things that can disqualify a company from being granted a company licence. The grounds for disqualification listed do not automatically disqualify a person or company from being granted a certificate o...

   Located in:

   1. Tribunals >
   2. Licences & certificates >
   3. Private Security Personnel Licensing Authority

7. Rangahaua Whanui National Overview volume 3 [pdf, 2.5 MB]

   ...generally, blocks were not protected from sale. The Kaihu block of 43,700 acres had title awarded in 1871 to 10 owners, with an additional list of 66 owners.24 The whole block was sold in 1880 for £3865. The table below gives the total amount of land privately acquired through the court between 1865 and 1908 at 9 percent. The actual figure must be seen as slightly higher than this, since this is the most difficult figure to estimate and is the area left when all other forms of alienation, and...

8. 2020 NZPSPLA 023 [pdf, 79 KB]

   [2020] NZPSPLA 023 Case number 000980 / 2017 IN THE MATTER OF The Private Security Personnel and Private Investigators Act 2010 AND IN THE MATTER OF Complaint by The Police under s 74 of the Act against LIAM SAVEA DECISION [1] The Police are asking for Liam Savea’s certificate of approval to be cancelled because he has recently been convicted of assault with intent to injure and sentenced to five months home detention. This conviction is grounds for disqu...

9. 2020 NZPSPLA 024 [pdf, 103 KB]

   [2020] NZPSPLA 024 Case number 001315 / 2017 IN THE MATTER OF A complaint under s 74 of The Private Security Personnel and Private Investigators Act 2010 BETWEEN THE POLICE Complainant AND SAVELIO PO’E-TOFAEONO Certificate Holder HEARING 21 October 2020 by telephone APPEARANCES Constable H Stringer & Sergeant Gallagher for NZ Police S Po’e-Tofaeono - Certificate Holder DECISION [1] Savelio Po’e-Tofaeono has recently been convicted of...

10. 2022 NZPSPLA 053.pdf [pdf, 102 KB]

    [2022] NZPSPLA 053 IN THE MATTER OF A complaint under s 74 of The Private Security Personnel and Private Investigators Act 2010 against FONG LEE LEOLAHI HEARD virtually on 21 December 2022 APPEARANCES Snr Constable A Tangney – NZ Police F Leolahi – Certificate Holder DECISION [1] Police have filed a complaint against Fong Leolahi as they consider he is no longer suitable to be a security worker because of his character, circumstances, or background. The p...