Search Results

1. Te Ohu Kaimoana Trustee Limited v Te Rūnanga nui o te Aupōuri - application under s 182(4) Māori Fisheries Act 2004 (2015) 102 Taitokerau MB 1 (102 TTK 1) [pdf, 314 KB]

   102 Taitokerau MB 1 IN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND TAITOKERAU DISTRICT A20130008950 UNDER Section 26C, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF An application by Te Ohu Kaimoana Trustee Limited for reference of Māori fisheries dispute between Te Rūnanga Nui o Te Aupōuri and Ngāti Kuri, Ngāi Takoto and Te Rarawa - referred under s 182(4), Māori Fisheries Act 2004 BETWEEN TE OHU KAIMOANA TRUSTEE LIMITED Applicant AND

2. [2016] NZEmpC 112 Radius Residential Care Ltd v The NZ Nurses Organisation Inc [pdf, 431 KB]

   RADIUS RESIDENTIAL CARE LIMITED v THE NEW ZEALAND NURSES ORGANISATION INC NZEmpC AUCKLAND [2016] NZEmpC 112 [31 August 2016] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2016] NZEmpC 112 EMPC 265/2015 IN THE MATTER OF proceedings removed from the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN RADIUS RESIDENTIAL CARE LIMITED Plaintiff AND THE NEW ZEALAND NURSES ORGANISATION INC First Defendant AND E TU INC (FORMERLY THE SERVICE & FOOD WOR

3. Family violence information sharing guidance [pdf, 3.4 MB]

   ...Greg may seriously injure or kill Maria. Maria is very reluctant to lay charges with Police as she is fearful of retribution from Greg if she does. However, Maria is on a community-based sentence and consents to Carmen sharing information with her Probation Officer, Sam, who is employed by the Department of Corrections. Maria, Carmen and Sam meet and discuss Maria’s risk of serious harm. At that meeting Maria reinforces that she does not consent to Police being involved. Followi...

4. Sharing Information Safely [pdf, 3.4 MB]

   ...Greg may seriously injure or kill Maria. Maria is very reluctant to lay charges with Police as she is fearful of retribution from Greg if she does. However, Maria is on a community-based sentence and consents to Carmen sharing information with her Probation Officer, Sam, who is employed by the Department of Corrections. Maria, Carmen and Sam meet and discuss Maria’s risk of serious harm. At that meeting Maria reinforces that she does not consent to Police being involved. Followi...

5. [2021] NZEnvC 062 Kombi Properties Limited (formerly HFT Limited) v Auckland Council [pdf, 2.6 MB]

   IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH I TE KOTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI OTAUTAHI IN THE MA T I ER AND BETWEEN AND Decision No. [2021] NZEnvC 62 of the Resource Management Act 1991 an appeal under s120 of the Act KOMBI PROPERTIES LIMITED (formerly HFT LIMITED) (ENV-2020-AKl-53) Appellant AUCKLAND COUNCIL Respondent Court: Environment Judge P A Steven Environment Commissioner A P Gysberts Environment Commissioner S Myers Hearing: Appearances: Last case ev

6. Strengthening the Criminal Justice System for Victims: Survey report [pdf, 1.2 MB]

   ...situation can’t be undone. But what I want to see is that individual ‘sorted out’ – one way or another, so that they become a productive member of society moving forward. If they don’t serve their full sentence and they offend again or breach probation: back in they go. While they’re in there, their time is spent learning the skills they lack.” Other respondents called for an approach which was solely focused on rehabilitation: “We need to move from a punitive system th...

7. National Standards Committee 1 v Gardner-Hopkins [2021] NZLCDT 21 (22 June 2021) [pdf, 360 KB]

   THE NAMES AND IDENTIFYING DETAILS OF THE COMPLAINANTS (INCLUDING K) ARE PERMANENTLY SUPPRESSED. THE NAMES OF ANONYMISED WITNESSES ARE SUPPRESSED PENDING FURTHER ORDER. ORDERS MADE PURSUANT TO S 240 OF THE LAWYERS AND CONVEYANCERS ACT 2006. NEW ZEALAND LAWYERS AND CONVEYANCERS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2021] NZLCDT 21 LCDT 022/20 IN THE MATTER of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 BETWEEN NATIONAL STANDARDS COMMITTEE No. 1 Applicant AND JAME

8. [2023] NZEnvC 045 Gray v Dunedin City Council [pdf, 527 KB]

   GRAY & SINCLAIR-GRAY v DCC – DECISION IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI ŌTAUTAHI Decision No. [2023] NZEnvC 45 IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND an appeal under s120 of the Act BETWEEN G S GRAY AND K M SINCLAIR- GRAY (ENV-2022-CHC-024) Appellants AND DUNEDIN CITY COUNCIL Respondent Court: Environment Judge P A Steven Environment Commissioner S Myers Hearing: at Dunedin on 14 December 2022 Appearance

9. LCRO 201/2021 DK obo The LK Estate v BY and FM (31 July 2023) [pdf, 305 KB]

   LEGAL COMPLAINTS REVIEW OFFICER ĀPIHA AROTAKE AMUAMU Ā-TURE [2023] NZLCRO 080 Ref: LCRO 201/2021 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a decision of the [Area] Standards Committee [X] BETWEEN DK obo THE LK ESTATE Applicant AND BY and FM Respondents DECISION The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. Introduct

10. LCRO 097/2023 RQ and EP v OM (14 February 2024) [pdf, 288 KB]

    ...second applicant’s digital communications but that is not what this review is about. The review is about the respondent’s professional conduct once she was engaged by Mr X. [93] The material does not appear to have any other arguable relevance or probative value, other than possibly to evidence and reinforce the Court’s findings of its inadequacy to establish jurisdiction under the FVA and its reasons for the strike-out and the costs decision. (c) Is the complaint, and consequ...