998 items matching your search terms
0 ACCESS TO JUSTICE: 2023 LEGAL NEEDS SURVEY FINAL REPORT 29 October 2024 1 Acknowledgements from the Ministry of Justice and the Ministry for Business, Innovation, and Employment Survey participants We would like to thank the 5,390 New Zealanders who took part in the survey and shared their stories. Service providers We appreciate the work of Ian Binnie and his team at Solasta Consulting who prepared for, and
Conviction and Sentencing of Offenders in New Zealand: 1996 to 2005 Nataliya Soboleva & Jin Chong 2 First published in December 2006 by the Ministry of Justice PO Box 180 Wellington New Zealand © Crown Copyright ISSN 1172-0638 3 Foreword The ‘Conviction and Sentencing’ report, which is published ann
...regardless of an individual’s role in the event. 2 All differences significant at the 5% level of significance. In this report significance implies statistical significance. 3 Breaches are principally breaches of community service orders, parole, or probation. 4 For the purposes of this evaluation, a serious offence is defined as any offence with a justice sector seriousness score of 150 or above. Common offences with a seriousness score of just over 150 are: Threatens To Kill/Do Griev...
...Discovery) [2022] NZHRRT 6 Discovery – rationale for Matsuoka v E Tū Incorporated (Preservation Orders) [2018] NZHRRT 49 Discovery – right to be free from discrimination versus confidentiality interests of third party – assessment of – whether probative value outweighed by confidentiality interest – relevance of redaction of document and the giving of undertaking by party seeking discovery – Evidence Act 2006, s 69 Waters v Alpine Energy Ltd (Discovery No. 2) [2015] NZHRRT 7 D...
...Good 3 Fair 4 Poor 5 Very poor NOT ON SHOWCARD: 98 Don't know [Showcard I, page 9] Q25.4 Juries. [Code one only] 1 Excellent 2 Good 3 Fair 4 Poor 5 Very poor NOT ON SHOWCARD: 98 Don't know [Showcard I, page 9] Q25.5 Probation officers. [Code one only] 1 Excellent 2 Good 3 Fair 4 Poor 5 Very poor NOT ON SHOWCARD: 98 Don't know [Showcard I, page 9] Q25.6 Prison service. [Code one only] 1 Excellent 2 Good 3 Fair 4 Poor 5 Very poor...
Submitted to Office of the Chief Victims Advisor to Government by Elaine Mossman 29 May 2020 Independent bodies and complaint mechanisms for victims of crime Contents Summary ................................................................................................................................ i 1 Introduction .............................................................................................................
IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI TĀMAKI MAKAURAU Decision [2024] NZEnvC 047 IN THE MATTER the Resource Management Act 1991 AND of an appeal under section 120 of the Act BETWEEN WASTE MANAGEMENT NZ LIMITED (ENV-2021-AKL-000137) Appellant AND HAURAKI DISTRICT COUNCIL WAIKATO REGIONAL COUNCIL Respondents AND MARK OFSOSKE TE KUPENGA O NGĀTI HAKO Section 274 Parties Court: Environment Judge D A
...or efficient way of achieving either sustainable management or the objectives included in the proposed plan. 8.3 The decision will not enhance economic growth or employment opportunities. 8.4 The decision is not supported by any evidence of probative value, or has no rational basis. 8.5 In particular, but without limitation: (a) Viaduct Harbour Precinct is the most successful precinct in the Central Area. (b) The Precinct is almost fully developed in accordance with the pr...
...police officer in early 2000, Mr Ramkissoon started again on the bottom rung of the police ladder. 7 Creedy v Commissioner of Police [2011] NZEmpC 104, [2011] ERNZ 285 at [8]-[9]. He was a probationary constable, although expecting realistically that his prior learning and experience would enable him to progress in the Police more quickly than other new recruits. That appears to have occurred. [19] After training, Mr Ramk...
Evaluation of Victim Support’s Full-time Homicide Caseworker Support Service 9 November 2015 Alison Chetwin Dr Sue Carswell Dr Trish Young Integrity Professionals 2 Acknowledgements The evaluation team wish to thank the family members who generously shared their experiences for this evaluation. We also thank the other participants and Victim Support staff who assisted with access to information for the