Search Results

Search results for resources.

8830 items matching your search terms

  1. Ha v The Real Estate Agents Authority (CAC 412) and Griffiths [2018] NZREADT 57 [pdf, 369 KB]

    ...correct in advising the second respondent of his right to terminate the sole agency agreement with The Professionals after 90 days pursuant to s 131. [9] During the course of submissions from counsel, reference was made to the history of the Resource Management Act applications which had been made in respect of the property. Brief comment on this aspect of the case is necessary. [10] The property which was the subject of the sale, which Mr Ha was instrumental in bringing about,...

  2. NZCVS Cycle3 A5 June 2021 v1.0 [pdf, 1.5 MB]

    ...to 2 July 2020 and in Auckland from 12 August to 2 September 2020. Cycle 3 results still largely reflect the period before the pandemic, because respondents were asked about their experiences over the previous 12 months. The full report and other resources are available on the Ministry of Justice website. In-depth reports using Cycle 3 data will be also made available on this website. 4 The extent and nature of crime In Cycle 3, 29% of adults1 had experienced one or more offences ov...

  3. [2023] NZEnvC 056 Waikanae Land Company Limited v Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga [pdf, 397 KB]

    ...ENVIRONMENT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KOTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA IN THE MA TIER Decision No. [2023] NZEnvC 056 of an appeal under s 58 of the Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga Act 2014 and an application under s 87G of the Resource Management Act 1991 BETWEEN WAIKANAE LAND COMP ANY LIMITED AND AND AND Court: Hearing: Last case event: Appearances: (ENV-2021-WLG-000034) (ENV-2022-WLG-000014) Appellant/ Applicant HERITAGE NEW ZEALAND POUHERE...

  4. Taipana - Āorangi Part Taonui Āhuatūranga Block 3A2 (2024) 486 Aotea MB 169-185 (486 AOT 169-185) [pdf, 688 KB]

    ...Period. A Code of Compliance Certificate for any occupied building on the Site must be provided to the Court prior to the expiry of the Construction Period, and to the Landowner(s) if requested. (b) The Occupier shall obtain all required building and resource consents from the Council for any buildings that are located on the site. These must be provided to the Landowner(s) if requested. (c) The Occupier shall ensure that, should any application for resource consent require identify...

  5. OIA-109743.pdf [pdf, 2.4 MB]

    ...to access court documents and those filed by other parties; providing them with a single trusted source of information about their case 10.2. Logistics management – supporting the right things to occur at the right time, including allocating resources in the most effective way. 10.3. Content management – supporting the use, management, and access to court information/files 10.4. Procedure management – supporting the application of the procedural process, including judicial de...

  6. 2023-08-18-Submissions-of-Alan-Jamieson.pdf [pdf, 208 KB]

    ...Appendix E – Discussion about the shared path by some partners to Ō2NL. E-1 Expert Evidence 04 - Muaūpoko Tribal Authority - … access to raupō restoration area from the shared use path in the wai karito tributary … harvesting of Māori resources from the shared use pathway such as harakeke and raupō … Use of tree forts as a mahi toi design parameter alongside the shared-use path … E-2 Expert Evidence 11 - Ngāti Wehi Wehi - … integrate these sites of historical and c...

  7. MacDonald v Accident Compensation Corporation (Leave to appeal to the High Court) [2024] NZACC 202 (9 December 2024) [pdf, 235 KB]

    ...delivered must stand for better or worse, subject, of course, to appeal. Were it otherwise, there would be great inconvenience and uncertainty. [27] These cases therefore set the threshold for recall at a high level. Understandably so. Judicial resources are finite, and the standard remedies of appeal and judicial review are available. [28] At any given time, there are approximately 200 ACC appeals awaiting hearing. [29] And in order that the fundamental underlying ethos of the...

  10. [2010] NZEmpC 80 Willis v Fonterra Cooperative Group Ltd [pdf, 84 KB]

    ...found that the plaintiff had been issued a verbal permit to perform the silo agitator checks. [9] On Monday 11 February 2007 Mr Purser, having received Mr Clement’s written report dated 8 February, contacted Alisa Ravji, an Human Resources Advisor at the Fonterra site, and she advised him on the investigation process he needed to follow. That same day Mr Purser said he spoke to the plaintiff and told him about Mr Clement’s written statement and the allegation that t...