Search Results

1. Canterbury Westland Standards Committee v Withers [2013] NZLCDT 39 [pdf, 229 KB]

   ...(“Clifden”), in relation to the subdivision of land it owned at Taylors Mistake Road, Christchurch. Mr Withers was acting as solicitor for Clifden on the matter, and he was also a director and shareholder in Clifden. [44] The Council had issued a resource consent for the subdivision, and a development contribution of $117,916.10 was required to be paid by Clifden to the Council as part of the subdivision process. [45] The Council’s policy was that the development cont...

2. McClelland v Schindler Lifts NZ Ltd [2015] NZHRRT 45 [pdf, 157 KB]

   ...competing accounts is to be believed. Preliminary matters [4] There are three preliminary matters to be noted. [5] First, Schindler was jointly represented at the hearing by Mr CA Andrews, South Island Manager and by Ms M Pabustan who is the Human Resources and Health and Safety Manager based in Auckland. Mr Andrews was the person who dealt directly with Mr McClelland in relation to the matters addressed in these proceedings but did so in consultation with and under the direction of...

3. NZCASS Data tables 2 reporting crime [xlsx, 809 KB]

   ...NZCASS 2014 for a general audience. Data item (variable) list A complete list of data items (variables) that are available for analysis, and will also help people who are interested in technical aspects of NZCASS analysis and reporting. Refer to Resources and downloads for a full list of NZCASS 2014 reporting products Contact us for further information about these and related statistics http://www.justice.govt.nz/publications/global-publications/n/new-zealand-crime-and-...

4. Chalecki v ACC [2015] NZACA 1 [pdf, 132 KB]

   ...with 1,600 laying hens and building it up to 2,000 hens. He also intended to breed pigs for the local market for additional income. There was already a substantial poultry shed on the property, in which he had 900 laying hens purchased from his own resources. He wished to apply the grant of $5,000 to establish a chick-rearing shed, which would cost $5,000 ($2,000 for timber and $3,000 for labour). [32] The accountant considered that, given Mr Chalecki’s experience and obvious det...

5. [2017] NZEmpC 127 South Canterbury District Health Board v Sanderson [pdf, 709 KB]

   ...That all said, the DHB’s expectations from 23 June 2017 are as described in Dr Earnshaw’s memorandum of that date. Frequency and urgency of call-back [71] Ms Moginie, who as mentioned earlier, is a director responsible for human resources, collated on-call/call-back data for each of the ATs for the period 1 October 2015 to 31 October 2016. This indicated that an average of approximately 11 per cent of total on-call time was required for call-back in that period. Aver...

6. BORA Armed Forces Law Reform Bill [pdf, 557 KB]

   ...there is no ability to deal summarily with minor charges against senior officers: the resulting requirement to convene a general court martial to try those officers for minor offences is considered inefficient and an unwarranted expenditure of public resources. Courts martial system • Courts martial are currently convened by senior officers in command who approve the charges and also appoint the prosecutor and the members of the court (i.e. military officers who perform a similar func...

7. Appendix One to Cabinet Paper Reforming the Privacy Act 1993 [pdf, 378 KB]

   ...currently preformed by the Director. Reject. The primary conciliation role of the Commissioner is maintained, and the continued separation of compliance and litigation functions ensures that parties can freely engage in conciliation Prosecutorial resources and expertise will not need to be duplicated in OPC. 61 The chairperson of the Human Rights Review Tribunal should be a judge at the level of a District Court Judge. Reject. No evidence that previous chairs have been subject...

8. Standards Committees v Deliu [2016] NZLCDT 41 [pdf, 441 KB]

   ...reasonable in such proceedings. He indicated that he put his clients’ matters first and worked around his personal matters. He appeared to consider that a valid reason for his lapses. We perceive that he has put an enormous amount of time and resources into representing himself on this matter over the past eight years. But it has been his choice to do so, and we consider any practitioner who elects to represent themselves must apply the same professional diligence and attentio...

9. Proprietors of Potikirua Block Incorporated v Te Kani - Lot 1 Deposited Plan 8212 [2013] Chief Judge's MB 82 (2013 CJ 82) [pdf, 1.3 MB]

   2013 Chief Judge's MB 82 IN THE MAORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WAIARIKI DISTRICT A20110012322 CJ 2011/44 UNDER Section 45, Te Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Lot 1 Deposited Plan 8212 formerly pati of Potikirua Incorporation BETWEEN The Proprietors of Potikirua Block Incorporation Applicant AND Parekura Te Kani (now deceased) Respondent Hearing: 16 December 2011,45 Waiariki MB 47-48 9 March 2012,2012 Chief Judge's MB 87 10 July 2012,23 Tairawhiti MB 2

10. UK v VL LCRO 142/2013 (2 September 2016) [pdf, 257 KB]

    LCRO 142/2013 CONCERNING An application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING A determination of the National Standards Committee BETWEEN UK Applicant AND VL Respondent DECISION The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. Introduction [1] Mr [UK] has applied for a review of a decision by the National Standards Committee dated 12 April 2013 in which the Co