Search Results

1. Justice-Factsheet-for-claimant-funding-for-Tuapapa-Stage.pdf [pdf, 288 KB]

   ...A bank deposit slip or screenshot including bank logo, account name and account number for the person named in the claim. Send your forms to: Email: claimantfunding@justice.govt.nz Post: Te Tāhū o te Ture – Ministry of Justice Crown Response to Justice System Kaupapa Inquiry DX SX 10042 Wellington New Zealand If you have questions please call: 0800 268 787 or text 027 361 2236 Need support with a request for reimbursement? The Ministry will have a small team...

2. FINAL-Justice-Factsheet-for-claimant-funding-for-Tuapapa-Stage.pdf [pdf, 289 KB]

   ...A bank deposit slip or screenshot including bank logo, account name and account number for the person named in the claim. Send your forms to: Email: claimantfunding@justice.govt.nz Post: Te Tāhū o te Ture – Ministry of Justice Crown Response to Justice System Kaupapa Inquiry DX SX 10042 Wellington New Zealand If you have questions please call: 0800 268 787 or text 027 361 2236 Need support with a request for reimbursement? The Ministry will have a small team...

3. IACDT annual report 2020 [pdf, 286 KB]

   ...There is a Memorandum of Understanding between the Ministry of Justice and the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment in regard to the Tribunal and the Immigration Advisers Authority, entered into in 2015. It sets out the respective responsibilities of the Ministries. Publication of Tribunal Decisions The Tribunal has a practice of publishing every decision on its website. However, the Chair can order that any part of the evidence or the name of any witness not be pu...

4. LM v JD & TD [2022] NZDT 6 (8 March 2022) [pdf, 224 KB]

   ...not been met in the circumstances of this case therefore I dismiss the costs claimed. 19. With regard to all other costs claimed by both parties, I find that in the interests of justice the costs will lie where they fall, and each party shall be responsible for its own costs. 20. For the above reasons the claim and the counterclaim are dismissed and therefore I have not considered the reasonableness of the fence costs. Referee: N Gold Date: 8 March 2022...

5. TQ v OC [2021] NZDT 1620 (26 July 2021) [pdf, 157 KB]

   ...Was there a misrepresentation in the sale of the motor? 4. This is the sale of a good, made in the context of a private sale. OC is not in trade and sold the motor privately. The general position for such purchases is that the buyer must be responsible for his or her own purchasing decisions. The starting point is the principle of caveat emptor, or ‘buyer beware’. 5. However, if a misrepresentation is made in the process of the sale, then a buyer who has purchased based on...

6. [2021] NZACC 8 - Stryder v ACC (12 January 2021) [pdf, 140 KB]

   ...his consent to send anything to the Corporation, as Dr Maginness’ email set out above at paragraph [3] makes clear. [17] On 7 June 2019 the Corporation sent an email to the appellant which included the following: … I note that your response to the two information request non compliance warning letters of last week did not include the requested consent, or a reasonable explanation for not providing the consent … please provide the requested consents by Friday 14/06/201...

7. [2022] NZEmpC 58 GF v Comptroller of the New Zealand Customs Service [pdf, 192 KB]

   ...mana in the consultation and termination process; failed to enter into mediation when it was offered by the plaintiff; and failed to enter into further consultation on the applicability and interpretation of the relevant COVID-19 Public Health Response (Vaccinations) Order. [12] Counsel for the defendant cites Smith v Attorney-General in support of a submission that, in cases involving a novel duty claim, the defendant and the Court are entitled to expect the plaintiff to explain...

8. [2021] NZACC 193 - Koloni v ACC (2 December 2021) [pdf, 212 KB]

   ...County v Nash (No. 2) [1968] NZLR 632. 4 Above, note 3, at 633. 5 R v Smith [2003] 3 NZLR 617 at [36].. 3 fundamental error in procedure is not corrected and where there is no alternative effective remedy reasonably available. Without such response, public confidence in the administration of justice would be undermined. [7] In Unison Networks Ltd,6 the Court of Appeal considered the application of the second and third categories in Horowhenua. The Court stated: [34] We con...

9. CW Ltd v KI [2020] NZDT 1359 (21 October 2020) [pdf, 194 KB]

   ...what is going to be printed is sent to the client for approval. KI said she assumed QQ had just sent her the interior for approval. However the proof also contains the wording “Please check thoroughly. By accepting this proof, you accept all responsibility for errors so please be thorough.” The proof also contains enough details in terms of how the 28pp booklet is made up, that a thorough check should have revealed that only the ‘interior’ was being printed. “6 pages of Cust...

10. EI v TB [2020] NZDT 401 (19 March 2020) [pdf, 130 KB]

    ...stopped to let EI through and that he had not been able to react and stop in the time available. He said that at the point of impact half of the bonnet of EI’s car was on the median strip. TB felt that he had taken sufficient care and that EI was responsible for the collision occurring. [10] Mr N, who represented B Ltd at the hearing, was also of view that EI had caused the collision. He drew my attention to the case of Netzler v Economy Taxi Limited [2006] DCR 185 which he thought ma...