Search Results

1. LCRO 29/2023 CP v SW and KM (19 December 2023) [pdf, 245 KB]

   ...had said he wanted the firm to pay for any penalties. He stated that he said only that if there was some penalty “due to the different understanding of the rules of LINZ and the delay because of the Covid situation” he was not sure who would be responsible for it. He stated that “I do not think that it is a so-called ‘threat’. Of course, others can judge it.” [94] In my view, the applicant was protesting a little much. If the applicant and Ms AB had been unable to settle...

2. Mann v Accident Compensation Corporation (Jurisdiction, Social Rehabilitation, Costs on Review) [2023] NZACC 91 [pdf, 365 KB]

   ...Corporation’s decisions of 23 September 2020: (1) declining to provide Mr Mann with a social rehabilitation assessment and transport assistance, and (2) dismissing an allegation that the Corporation had failed to issue a decision in a timely manner in response to Mr Mann’s request for an individual rehabilitation plan. Mr Mann also appeals the review costs awarded by the Reviewer on 11 May 2021. 2 Procedural Matter [2] Mr Mann’s appeal was filed on 11 June 2021, in the...

3. [2025] NZEmpC 114 VXO v Health New Zealand Te Whatu Ora [pdf, 329 KB]

   ...conversation, there were things that needed to be done on the ward, and he and the RMO started texting. He then says: I can see that there was a mixing between social and professional interactions. At sometime, the boundary became blurred and as we sent responses and read the replies, the repartee became more risque. I said something close to cheeky and got a cheeky response back. It was quite entertaining. At the time, I thought that this was something perhaps flirty, that yo...

4. Grants-Handbook-v5.pdf [pdf, 1.8 MB]

   ...Services Agency as a Crown entity on February 1, 2001 and was amended effective 1 March 2007. The Legal Services Act 2011 (LSA) came into force on 1 July 2011 and disestablished the Legal Services Agency. It established the Secretary for Justice’s responsibilities for Legal Aid. Under the direction of the Minister and the Secretary, the Legal Services Commissioner is responsible for granting legal aid. Transitional policy and procedures Section 145 of the Legal Services Act 2011 (th...

5. Grants Handbook v4.89 [pdf, 1.1 MB]

   ...Services Agency as a Crown entity on February 1, 2001 and was amended effective 1 March 2007. The Legal Services Act 2011 (LSA) came into force on 1 July 2011 and disestablished the Legal Services Agency. It established the Secretary for Justice’s responsibilities for Legal Aid. Under the direction of the Minister and the Secretary, the Legal Services Commissioner is responsible for granting legal aid. Transitional policy and procedures Section 145 of the Legal Services Act 2011 (t...

6. Grants Handbook v4.91.pdf [pdf, 1.4 MB]

   ...Services Agency as a Crown entity on February 1, 2001 and was amended effective 1 March 2007. The Legal Services Act 2011 (LSA) came into force on 1 July 2011 and disestablished the Legal Services Agency. It established the Secretary for Justice’s responsibilities for Legal Aid. Under the direction of the Minister and the Secretary, the Legal Services Commissioner is responsible for granting legal aid. Transitional policy and procedures Section 145 of the Legal Services Act 2011 (th...

7. Grants Handbook v4.92.pdf [pdf, 1.8 MB]

   ...Services Agency as a Crown entity on February 1, 2001 and was amended effective 1 March 2007. The Legal Services Act 2011 (LSA) came into force on 1 July 2011 and disestablished the Legal Services Agency. It established the Secretary for Justice’s responsibilities for Legal Aid. Under the direction of the Minister and the Secretary, the Legal Services Commissioner is responsible for granting legal aid. Transitional policy and procedures Section 145 of the Legal Services Act 2011 (th...

8. Waitangi Tribunal Vol 3 Kāhui Maunga Report [pdf, 13 MB]

   ...management . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 886 12 .3 .4 unesco World heritage . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 886 12 .3 .5 Some specific responses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 886 12 .3 .6 The ‘gift’ and the reciprocal obligations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ....

9. [2007] NZEmpC CC 18/07 Murphy v Steel & Tube New Zealand Ltd [pdf, 144 KB]

   ...of 6 December 2005, Mr Fowler was working in his usual work area. Mr Murphy was passing by. He noticed pallets of steel plate had been placed in a dangerous position overlapping a designated walkway. Mr Murphy took the view that Mr Fowler was responsible for this, either because he incorrectly put the plate there or because it was his work area. Mr Murphy yelled at Mr Fowler to fix the problem. Mr Fowler objected to this. He made a rude gesture towards Mr Murphy. Mr Murphy ob...

10. [2017] NZEmpC 146 Yu v Zespri International Ltd [pdf, 767 KB]

    ...(ZMCC) to carry out marketing activities in that territory. [9] From 1 January 2009, Mr Yu worked full-time at the ZMCC offices in China, under secondment from Zespri. That role was extended for two years in 2010. During his secondment, he was responsible for coordinating Zespri’s marketing activities in China. [10] In about May 2011, the Shanghai Customs Anti-Smuggling Bureau (SCASB) commenced an investigation into the customs’ valuation practices of one of Zespri’s im...