Search Results

1. INZ (Foley) v Rodriguez [2019] NZIACDT 51 (23 July 2019) [pdf, 182 KB]

   ...is applicable in professional disciplinary proceedings. However, the quality of the evidence required to meet that standard may differ in cogency, depending on the gravity of the charges.9 [40] The Tribunal has received from the Registrar the statement of complaint, dated 17 October 2017, together with supporting documents. 3 Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s 45(2) & (3). 4 Section 49(3) & (4). 5 Sparks v Immigration Adv...

2. [2023] NZREADT 24 - CAC 2103 v Lieven (21 August 2023) [pdf, 242 KB]

   ...upheld, and the dispute at the hearing was limited to whether the conduct was unprofessional (rather than whether the conduct occurred). Similarly, in the present case, Ms Lieven was found not guilty on the two most serious charges and an agreed statement of facts was filed. [50] On 14 August, the Committee filed a schedule detailing their costs totalling $15,742.80, 20% of which is $3,148.56. [51] Counsel for Ms Lieven has agreed that a contribution of 20% of the Committee’s c...

3. LCRO 36/2023 TL v RY and SK (4 July 2024) [pdf, 180 KB]

   ...charge (…..) as a complete resolution? … [8] On 13 January 2015, the applicant’s lawyer responded to Mrs X that the applicant’s response was “a categorical no”. [9] On 14 January 2015, Mrs X emailed the applicant’s lawyer a witness statement she had received. [10] On 21–22 January 2015, Mr Y reviewed the file again and formed the view that the witness statement materially changed the evidential position regarding the charges. He concluded that the tests for prose...

4. ENVC Matiatia transcript 20141006 [pdf, 5.4 MB]

   ...And that Sir might be a convenient point if I may. THE COURT: JUDGE NEWHOOK Yes, now I will just float with you in sync with your responses but again I imagine that we’ll hear from other parties about it. Leaving aside the 15 statements by the Full Court or the High Court in Christchurch in 1999 which perhaps Mr Allan and Ms Schlaepfer will address but coming to your point, your point, your subsidiary point that it’s impossible for a Marina owner to control the t...

5. Paraire v Paraire – Part Mangatawa 10 (2015) 105 Waikato Maniapoto MB 67 (105 WMN 67) [pdf, 213 KB]

   ...behalf of my hapu I claim my inheritance and lawful title. 71. That due to the unnecessary actions of these proceedings, my health has suffered serious complications. Refer attached letter BOP District Health Board (H). 72. That I hereby make a statement as the rightful heir and successor to Taniko Ngatai Tapihana-Paraire. 73. That I hereby make a statement as the rightful heir and successor to Riini Paraire-Pine. 47 101 Waika...

6. Naera v Fenwick - Whakapoungakau 24 Tikitere Trust [2011] Māori Appellate Court MB 316 (2011 APPEAL 316) [pdf, 194 KB]

   ...we agree with the lower Court that the trustees had the power in terms of clause 3(a) to enter the TPA agreement. The first ground of appeal therefore fails. Did the trustees need to comply with section 244 of the Act? [30] The appellants claim that the variations to the trust order were unlawful, as neither the 2004 nor the 2009 amendments complied with the requirement of s 244(3) that the beneficiaries of the trust have sufficient notice of the application, time to discuss it,...

7. LCRO 123/2019 & 124/2019 MC v QK and QK v MC (3 March 2020) [pdf, 199 KB]

   ...[123] Whilst it is clearly the case that Ms ZN has played an active role in advancing both Mrs QK’s complaint, and the application for and response to review, Mrs QK has not been entirely silent. Included in the documentation filed on review was a statement from Mrs QK. I accept that it may be the case that Mrs QK was assisted in the drafting of that statement. 21 Section 203(b) of the Act. 20 [124] But the absence of more dir...

8. LCRO 88/2018 MC v OT (24 December 2018) [pdf, 225 KB]

   ...[6] Mr OT duly attended to the work necessary to obtain his client’s consent, and the required E-dealing attendances. [7] Mr BL submitted the E-dealing for registration in mid-February 2017. [8] On 21 February 2017, Mr OT sent an invoice and statement to Mr BL for $4,465.00 including GST and disbursements. Of that sum, $3,550.00 plus GST was Mr OT’s professional fees. Mr OT’s covering letter said in part: We note that all of the work that should be required of us has now bee...

9. [2023] NZREADT 28 - Whalan and Partners Ltd v CAC2107 & SL (06 October 2023) [pdf, 232 KB]

   ...was ridiculous. The vendors requested an investigation and that the agency be required to refund the overcharged $4,710. [25] In an email to the Authority on 23 September 2021, the vendors stated they do not believe any reasonable person could claim the contract was clear and accurate when clauses disagreed with each other. They brought this to the attention of the licensees at the very start of the process and received a reply from LQ that GST was included. [26] A formal comp...

10. Family violence information sharing guidance [pdf, 3.4 MB]

    Sharing information safely Guidance on sharing personal information under the Family Violence Act 2018 Publication details This Guidance may be revised periodically. Make sure you are working with the most current version. Images used throughout this document are intended to illustrate providers networking and are from a photolibrary using models. Fo re w or d Foreword New Zealand has unacceptable rates of family violence, which severely undermine the lifetime wellbeing of v