Search Results

Search results for statement of claim.

7298 items matching your search terms

  1. Far North District Council - Okahu 3B2B2 (2015) 97 Taitokerau MB 234 (97 TTK 234) [pdf, 396 KB]

    97 Taitokerau MB 234 IN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND TAITOKERAU DISTRICT A20120014247 UNDER Section 183, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Okahu 3B2B2 Block BETWEEN FAR NORTH DISTRICT COUNCIL Applicant A20140010697 UNDER Section 215, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Okahu 1, 3B2B2A, 3B2B2C, 3B2B2D, 4A, 4B, 4D, 4C1, 4C2, 3A 3B2A Blocks BETWEEN TE URI REIHANA-NGATOTE and

  2. Victims Code report PDF [pdf, 424 KB]

    1 The Victims Code: An exploration of how it is being used and options for the future June 2020 2 3 Acknowledgements1 I want to acknowledge and thank Anj Barton, previously a researcher with the Office of the Chief Victims Advisor, for her invaluable work in helping to produce this report. I also want to thank all the participants Anj interviewed. They willingly gave their tim

  3. Nepia Ranapia - Evidence in Chief [pdf, 1.6 MB]

    ...and the island was not abandoned. We still ~ad a presence there. For instance, the chiefs Te Puhi and Te Ahikaiata stayed on the island. 11 In 1851, our whanaunga (relations) who lived on the mainland came to the island to help us resist the claims of Te Arawa. This episode was a spillover from the mainland conflict between Ngai Te Rangi and Te Arawa iwi, dating back to the battle of Te Tumu between Te Arawa and Ngai Te Rangi in 1836. In the wake of Te Arawa's victory in the...

  4. [2017] NZEnvC 149 Matakana Coast Trail Trust v Auckland Council [pdf, 13 MB]

    ...in this case was the re-vegetation requirement of 8 ha for every lot, which this consent application was predicated upon. 5 The jurisdictional argument [12] An application to determine preliminary questions of law was made and relevant statements were: 2.2 A consent authority cannot require an applicant to dedicate private land to a public use. 2.3 The Court does not have jurisdiction to impose a condition requiring the provision of public access across API's land in th...

  5. Directory of Official Information M-O [pdf, 551 KB]

    Directory of Official Information Listings M-O About This is a living document. We endeavour to update it whenever there are changes to be made. If your department or agency’s information is out of date, please email oia@justice.govt.nz with the necessary amendments. We can send you a MS Word version if you need. Ministerial Relations and Services Strategy, Governance & Finance Ministry of Justice | Tāhū o te Ture oia@justice.govt.nz ma

  6. Directory of Official Information M-O [pdf, 552 KB]

    Directory of Official Information Listings M-O Author Version number Date About This is a living document. We endeavour to update it whenever there are changes to be made. If your department or agency’s information is out of date, please email oia@justice.govt.nz with the necessary amendments. We can send you a MS Word version if you need. Ministerial Relations and Services Strategy, Governance & Finance Ministry of Justice | Tāhū o te Ture

  7. [2021] NZEnvC 175 Shaw v Hamilton City Council [pdf, 2.5 MB]

    1 SHAW v HAMILTON CITY COUNCIL IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI TĀMAKI MAKAURAU Decision [2021] NZEnvC 175 IN THE MATTER of objections under Section 23 of the Public Works Act 1981 BETWEEN MURRAY NELSON SHAW AND MARGARET EVELYN SHAW (ENV-2019-AKL-000316) Objectors AND HAMILTON CITY COUNCIL Respondent Court: Environment Judge M J L Dickey Commissioner J A Hodges Commissioner R M Bartlett Hearing: at

  8. [2006] NZEmpC WC 15/06 OCS Ltd v Food Workers Union Inc [pdf, 108 KB]

    ...gave evidence said they had not heard of it before September. [14] On 13 September 2005 a Panztel terminal was installed at Wellington Hospital. Another of the union’s delegates, Kolopa Uiese, queried the installation when she saw it. OCS claimed that the terminal was installed because a Panztel technician was available in Wellington that day, and that at that point it had not made a decision about how or when the Panztel would be implemented. [15] On 22 September 2005 Mr M...

  9. [2013] NZEmpC 190 Belsham v Ports of Auckland Ltd [pdf, 165 KB]

    ...with Mr Kirwan, Mr Belsham of course maintained he had completed the hazard report. [14] In evidence, Mr Belsham’s position was that he did raise the health and safety issue as the basis for his refusal to man the straddle crane. He claimed that he raised the issue with Mr Kitching. The presence of Ms Flynn at that meeting assumes importance in this respect. Mr Belsham maintained that he raised the health and safety issue with Mr Kitching before Ms Flynn arrived. He st...

  10. Enabling-a-four-year-term-of-Parliament_Updated_FINAL.pdf [pdf, 3 MB]

    Hon Paul Goldsmith Minister of Justice Proactive release - Enabling a four-year term of Parliament Date of issue: 06 August 2025 The following documents have been proactively released in accordance with Cabinet Office Circular CO (23) 4. The documents have been updated with reduced redactions from their previous release on 4 March 2025. Some information has been withheld on the basis that it would not, if requested under the Official Information Act 1982 (OIA), be released . Where