Search Results

1. Waikato-and-Waipa-River-Iwi.pdf [pdf, 262 KB]

   ...to objectives, policies and rules in the WRC Decision version of PC1 that are set out in the tables in Appendices One and Two of the Iwi Co-Governors’ notice of appeal. 3. In respect of the specific reasons identified in the table below, any statements regarding opposition or support should be read alongside the matters set out in the Iwi Co-Governors’ notice of appeal. 7 B. Position on each Identified Appeal: Appellant Provision(s) Oppose/Support and Reasons OJI Fibre...

2. Waikato and Waipā River Iwi.pdf [pdf, 240 KB]

   ...to objectives, policies and rules in the WRC Decision version of PC1 that are set out in the tables in Appendices One and Two of the Iwi Co-Governors’ notice of appeal. 3. In respect of the specific reasons identified in the table below, any statements regarding opposition or support should be read alongside the matters set out in the Iwi Co-Governors’ notice of appeal. 7 B. Position on each Identified Appeal: Appellant Provision(s) Oppose/Support and Reasons OJI Fibre...

3. Director of Proceedings v Ramsden [2022] NZHRRT 25 [pdf, 624 KB]

   ...the Health and Disability Commissioner Act 1994 were filed on 3 May 2022. [2] Prior to the filing of the proceedings the parties resolved all matters in issue and the Tribunal is asked to make a consent declaration. The parties have filed: [2.1] A statement of claim dated 3 May 2022. [2.2] A consent memorandum dated 29 March 2022. [2.3] An Agreed Summary of Facts, a copy of which is annexed and marked ‘A’. [3] In the Consent Memorandum dated 29 March 2022 the parties request that t...

4. [2021] NZACC 90 - Goh v ACC (24 June 2021) [pdf, 172 KB]

   ...decision, or the true and only reasonable conclusion on the evidence contradicts the decision: Edwards v Bairstow , 57. The Court of Appeal in Lang v Eagle Airways Ltd [1996] 1 ERNZ 574, 576, cited Edwards v Bairstow in support of the following statement: “If those conclusions were not reasonably open to the Judge then this Court can rule, as a matter of law, that they are unsustainable and should be set aside . . .” Whether or not particular evidence is relevant to a particular...

5. Interim Impact Summary: Public discussion document - Proposed changes to the incitement provisions in the Human Rights Act 1993 [pdf, 3.8 MB]

   RE LE AS ED B Y TH E MIN IS TR Y OF JU ST IC E RE LE AS ED B Y TH E MIN IS TR Y OF JU ST IC E RE LE AS ED B Y TH E MIN IS TR Y OF JU ST IC E Interim Impact Summary – Incitement of Hatred and Discrimination -Release of Discussion Document | 4 other circumstances) being a precursor to violence and extremism.4 The Royal Commission echoed these harmful impacts of hate speech.5 Incitement provisions only cover a limited range of groups

6. Auckland Standards Committee 4 v Kennelly [2022] NZLCDT 31 (1 September 2022) [pdf, 130 KB]

   ...relation to the funds. Should it have been? Mr Kennelly appears to blame the beneficiaries or the Standards Committee for failure to notice the additional default. [34] The beneficiaries were adults. They had received a substantial payout and a statement which noted the retention of funds for tax and accounting fees. Mr Kennelly, as sole executor, should have dealt with those matters in a timely manner. Instead, having put the funds in interest bearing deposit, he seems to hav...

7. [2023] NZEmpC 233 Danske Mobler Ltd v A Labour Inspector of the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment [pdf, 281 KB]

   ...[55] I reserve costs. Since there was a mixed outcome, my provisional view is that costs should lie where they fall. If, however, one party or other chooses to file a costs application, I will receive memoranda. [56] The applicant should file a statement of claim by 4 pm on 7 February 2024. B A Corkill Judge Judgment signed at 11.30 am on 19 December 2023

8. Director of Proceedings v Xu [2023] NZHRRT 30 [pdf, 554 KB]

   ...under the Health and Disability Commissioner Act 1994 were filed on 27 June 2023 [2] Prior to the filing of the proceedings the parties resolved all matters in issue and the Tribunal is asked to make orders by consent. The parties have filed: [2.1] A Statement of Claim dated 27 June 2023. [2.2] A Consent Memorandum dated 27 June 2023 [2.3] An Agreed Summary of Facts, a copy of which is annexed and marked ‘A’. [3] In the Consent Memorandum dated 27 June 2023 the parties request th...

9. Fergusson v Accident Compensation Corporation (Weekly Compensation) [2023] NZACC 119 [pdf, 194 KB]

   ...overriding goals, minimising both the overall incidence of injury in the community, and the impact of injury on the community (including economic, social, and personal costs), through— … 6 (d) ensuring that, during their rehabilitation, claimants receive fair compensation for loss from injury, including fair determination of weekly compensation … [23] Section 15 provides: (1) Earnings as a shareholder-employee, in relation to a person who is a shareholder-employee...

10. Director of Proceedings v Health New Zealand – Te Whatu Ora [2025] NZHRRT 22 [pdf, 424 KB]

    ...Health and Disability Commissioner Act 1994 were filed on 6 March 2025. Prior to the filing of the proceedings the parties resolved all matters in issue and the Tribunal is asked to make a consent declaration. The parties have filed: [1.1] A statement of claim dated 6 March 2025. [1.2] A consent memorandum dated 4 March 2025. [1.3] An agreed summary of facts dated 4 March 2025, a copy of which is annexed and marked ‘A’. [2] At paragraph 2(a) of the consent memorandum the...