Search Results

1. [2025] NZEmpC 210 Harte v Midwifery Employee Representation and Advisory Service Inc [pdf, 175 KB]

   ...Employee Representation and Advisory Service Inc [2024] NZERA 65. undermining of the employment relationship for which a remedy of compensation and the imposition of a penalty are sought; the second is directed at a letter and alleged oral statements made by the defendant, which are said to be false and to the plaintiff’s discredit. [3] The challenge was set down for a hearing in Nelson. During the course of the hearing, issues were raised about the admissibility of ema...

2. [2024] NZEnvC 100 Merveber Limited v Auckland Council [pdf, 3.2 MB]

   ...K Hartley and A F Buchanan for Auckland Council (the Council) Date of Decision: 8 May 2024 Date of Issue: 8 May 2024 DECISION OF THE ENVIRONMENT COURT 2 A: The decision of the Auckland Council Commissioners declining consent is confirmed. The appeal is dismissed. B: Any application for cost is to be filed within 20 working days, any reply is to be filed within a further 10 working days, and the final reply, if any, is to be filed five working days there...

3. Proposed model for establishing a Criminal Cases Review Commission - Redacted [pdf, 282 KB]

   ...convicted person or a representative will have either applied or signalled an intention to do so. 42. Where the CCRC decides to open a case review on its own initiative, it should as soon as possible approach the relevant convicted person to secure their consent to proceed. A referral is not possible without an appellant, and the CCRC should therefore not exercise its powers to review a case where the relevant person is not seeking or does not support the terms of a referral. Decisions...

4. ENV-2016-AKL-000206 Cato Bolam Consultants Limited v Auckland Council [pdf, 10 MB]

   ...provis ions or wish to have them amended and the reasons for your views. I wish to have the provisions identified above amended: Yes -fd:6CFf] The reasons for my views are: Policy 1(a) is not clear. We cannot determine what is meant by the statement "provide cumulatively for at least 10 per cent of the natural extent of each ecosystem type" I seek the following decision by Council: Accept the Proposed Plan with amendments as outlined below If the Proposed Plan is not d...

5. [2021] NZEmpC 21 Neil v New Zealand Nurses Organisation [pdf, 162 KB]

   ANGELA NEIL v NEW ZEALAND NURSES ORGANISATION [2021] NZEmpC 21 [8 March 2021] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2021] NZEmpC 21 EMPC 191/2020 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER OF an application for stay of proceedings BETWEEN ANGELA NEIL First Plaintiff AND TINA WEST Second Plaintiff

6. 2021-07-09 Minute - Pre-Hearing Conference [pdf, 171 KB]

   ...this plan change (i.e. pork, diary, deer etc). (c) farmer expertise on farm settings and systems; (d) court site visit (to support informed understanding of farm settings and systems); and (e) planning evidence by ORC policy planner and ORC consents and regulatory planner as to outcomes to be achieved under PC8, the proposed amendments and supporting reasons and s 32AA report. This does not preclude primary industry nominated planner(s) and witnesses from other parties giving...

7. 2.-Tim-Watterson-Project-Design-compressed.pdf [pdf, 27 MB]

   ...WELLINGTON REGISTRY I MUA I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA TE WHANGANUI-Ā-TARA ROHE ENV-2020-WLG-00014 UNDER the Resource Management Act 1991 IN THE MATTER OF a notice of motion under section 87G of the Act seeking the grant of resource consents to Waka Kotahi NZ Transport Agency for Te Ahu a Turanga: Manawatū-Tararua Highway STATEMENT OF EVIDENCE OF TIMOTHY JOHN WATTERSON ON BEHALF OF WAKA KOTAHI NZ TRANSPORT AGENCY PROJECT DESIGN 12 June 2020...

8. Auckland Standards Committee 2 v Burcher [2018] NZLCDT 37 [pdf, 276 KB]

   ...hide the transaction from you, John Macdonald and myself. (b) To get his hands on the deposits which I understand from John Macdonald were taken, the instant the funds were paid/transferred and with retrospective journals without notice to or the consent of his co-directors. (c) I await with interest to see the alleged priority and consent letters and note: i. Waitangi Investments Limited has never signed such a letter. ii. The B investors have, I am told, never signed such a letter an...

9. Rogers v CAC 10028 & McGillen [2011] NZREADT 14 [pdf, 86 KB]

   ...Mr McGillen said because of the pressure of time they were under with the deadline of 5.00 pm that day. [32] Mr McGillen in his evidence was referred to his original complaint to the Committee dated 25 February 2010 which contained the following statement: “At the time of negotiations Sam represented that this was a multi offer situation with several offers being presented to the vendors. We received one hour’s notice that in fact only our offer would be presented.” Mr M...

10. McFarlane v Auckland Council [2011] NZWHT Auckland 49 [pdf, 69 KB]

    ...Bays Plumbing which was therefore removed from the proceedings. The claim proceeded to adjudication against Antony David Webber, the second respondent, and Frederick Peter Garton, the third respondent. THE CLAIM [2] In their amended statement of claim dated 15 July 2011 the MacFarlanes claimed that Mr Webber and Mr Garton were liable as builders and/or head contractors and/or project managers for the weathertightness defects. At the relevant time Mr Webber and Mr Ga...