Search Results

1. Ngā Mātāpono – The Principles: The Interim Report of the Tomokia Ngā Tatau o Matangireia – The Constitutional Kaupapa Inquiry Panel on the Crown’s Treaty Principles Bill and Treaty Clause Review Policies [pdf, 6.4 MB]

   W A I T A N G I T R I B U N A L R E P O R T 2 0 2 4 N G Ā M Ā TĀ P O N O The Principles NGĀ MĀTĀPONO The Principles W A I 3 3 0 0 W A I T A N G I T R I B U N A L R E P O R T 2 0 2 4 N G Ā M Ā T Ā P O N O T H E P R I N C I P L E S The Interim Report of the Tomokia Ngā Tatau o Matangireia – the Constitutional Kaupapa Inquiry Panel on the Crown’s Treaty Principles Bill and

2. [2011] NZEmpC 68 Army Surplus Disposals Ltd v Reed [pdf, 110 KB]

   ...referring to the plaintiff’s intention to call evidence from at least three other witnesses who were identified by name. [10] In view of the urgency then prevailing, Chief Judge Colgan made further timetabling directions. The plaintiff was to file statements of evidence-in-chief intended to be given by all of its witnesses at the hearing and which briefs were to include the names and other usual identifying particulars of the witnesses. The deadline for filing and service was se...

3. 2021-02-19 Tom de Pelsemaeker - Reply - Planning - Recommended decisions on submissions (19 Feb 2021) [pdf, 2 MB]

   Provision ORC submission Number Submitter ID Submission Point ID Further Submitter ID Name Support / Oppose Decision requested (see submission for reasons) Officer recommendation All Plan Change 7 70013 70013.01 Aepurist International Not stated An efficient, effective and fair regulatory framework that provides for greater security for the Otago Region and horticulture An Objective, Policies and methods for an interim framework that provides for longer term (20 year) r

4. Tom De Pelsemaeker - ORC Final Evidence-in-Reply - Recommended Decisions on Submissions (25 June 2021) [pdf, 2 MB]

   Provision ORC submission Number Submitter ID Submission Point ID Further Submitter ID Name Support / Oppose Decision requested (see submission for reasons) Officer recommendation All Plan Change 7 70013 70013.01 Aepurist International Not stated An efficient, effective and fair regulatory framework that provides for greater security for the Otago Region and horticulture An Objective, Policies and methods for an interim framework that provides for longer term (20 year) r

5. 2023-09-04-O2NL-Conditions-Mediation-Version-tracked.pdf [pdf, 2.1 MB]

   Ōtaki to north of Levin Highway Project DRAFT CONDITIONS: MEDIATION (TRACKED) 1 DRAFT CONDITIONS [MEDIATION VERSION (TRACKED)] Drafting notes: The base document of the attached draft conditions is the clean evidence version of A McLeod that includes: - Amendments made through witness conferencing (appended to the JWS of the planners and the JWS of the water abstraction and planners). These amendments are shown in red underline and red strikethrough. - Amendments agreed or p

6. Waitangi Tribunal Vol 2 Kāhui Maunga Report [pdf, 12 MB]

   t e K ā h u i M a u n g a Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz t e K ā h u i M a u n g a The National Park District Inquiry Report Volume 2 Waitangi Tribunal Report 2013 Wai 1130 Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz National Library of New Zealand Catalo

7. JK v OC LCRO 254/2013 (10 February 2015) [pdf, 93 KB]

   ...the force. [7] In March 2009, Mr JK lodged the first of his complaints against Mr OC. Those complaints were described by the Committee pursuing inquiry into the complaints as being, in general terms, complaint that Mr OC had “made a variety of statements and written submissions to various Courts, Judges, and a Tribunal adjudicator, which Mr JK alleges were deliberately false and misleading”.1 [8] In addition to filing complaints with the Law Society Complaints Service, Mr JK p...

8. [2011] NZEmpC 57 Wade v Hume Pack-N-Cool Ltd [pdf, 113 KB]

   ...facts emerge. The applicant challenged the Authority’s determination on 8 November 2007 and elected to have a hearing de 1 AA 322/07, 16 October 2007. novo. The respondent failed to file its statement of defence in time and applied for leave to file out of time. That application was not opposed and Chief Judge Colgan granted leave to extend the time for filing the statement of defence. The matter was called over before me on...

9. [2006] NZEmpC AC 73/06 CE Bay of Plenty DHB v NZ PSA [pdf, 75 KB]

   ...defendant union (“the PSA”) to pay to the Board $500 as a contribution to its costs in relation to a dispute. [2] The parties agreed that the matter could be determined on the papers by an exchange of submissions and on the basis of an agreed statement of facts. Background facts [3] The following is taken from the agreed statement of facts. [4] On 16 April 2004, the PSA filed with the Authority a statement of matter dated 14 April 2004. The PSA was seeking a determinatio...

10. [2013] NZEmpC 83 Davies v Dove Hawkes Bay Inc [pdf, 101 KB]

    ...dismissal) on its merits. It is agreed that Mr Davies did not raise that grievance with his former employer (Dove) within 90 days of being dismissed on or about 15 September 2011. He was either one or two days out of time in doing so. Dove did not consent to the Authority considering the grievance on its merits. [2] In these circumstances Mr Davies applied to the Authority under ss 114(4) and 115 of the Employment Relations Act 2000 (the Act). Mr Davies had