LCRO 202/2015 BT v DG (1 October 2018) [pdf, 234 KB]
...seems to expect the Committee to comment on the legal issues including the correctness of Dr DG’s opinion and Dr DG’s response to Mr BT’s requests for an opinion as to the procedure followed by the Court of Appeal. [38] The Committee’s statement that “it would have been inappropriate for” the Committee to do so is correct. Mr BT wanted to challenge the Court of Appeal judgment. In his 10 September 2013 response to Mr BT, Dr DG provided his view as to the best way to pr...