Search Results

1. [2015] NZEmpC 122 Campbell v The Commissioner of Salford School [pdf, 631 KB]

   ...expressed concerns over the previous six to 18 months. The purpose of the email would be to request information as to any concerns held by staff. Any issues could then be discussed in the upcoming mediation, although he did not rule out some statements being used for formal processes thereafter. He said that the atmosphere and concerns at Salford had not improved to the degree needed. He wanted to clarify whether it was Ms Campbell’s behaviour which was the problem – if so r...

2. UK v VL LCRO 142/2013 (2 September 2016) [pdf, 257 KB]

   ...2, at [39]-[41]. 7 Deliu v Connell & Others [2016] NZHC 361, [2016] NZAR 475 at [2]. 11 (b) Provide an independent opinion based on that information. Review Process [24] On 5 February 2014 the parties were offered the opportunity to consent to the review being determined on the papers in their absence. [25] On 10 February 2014 Mr [UK] sent an email saying he was overseas throughout February, and had other “attendance the first few weeks in March”, so “could only c...

3. Nepia Ranapia - Evidence in Chief [pdf, 1.6 MB]

   ...through the rules framework so that kina barrens can be eliminated, kelp species · can recover and allow restoration of taonga species and mauri. Once restored, waahi taonga areas can also be fished through the obtaining 1 452 of a resource consent. 6 I am Kaumatua and pukenga and exercise kaitiakitanga to the "Motiti Rohe Moana" (the Motiti sea territory/ papa io tai a koromiromiro). 7 This Appeal is brought by the Motiti Rohe Moan a Trust on behalf of the hap0...

4. Taueki v Procter - Horowhenua 11 (Lake) (2021) 437 Aotea MB 86 (437 AOT 86) [pdf, 389 KB]

   ...that, on 12 March 2021, Ms Thornton filed “reply” submissions to those of Mr McKechnie. Ms Thornton contended that a further opportunity for the filing of evidence and submissions was appropriate. On 13 July, Ms Thornton filed a further “statement of evidence” from Mr Rudd, including numerous annexures. Mr McKechnie understandably then sought the opportunity to consider the evidence and submissions in reply and reserved his clients’ position. Ngā take Issues [3] The...

5. [2013] NZEmpC 85 Aarts v Barnados New Zealand [pdf, 328 KB]

   ...person can aid or bet another’s breach only after that other’s commission of the breach is an important question, the decision of which is now not essential to Mr Aarts’s claims against the defendants other than his employer. [16] Mr Aarts’s statement of claim does not specify clearly the breach or breaches of his employment agreement by Barnardos to which he says the remaining defendants were parties. For the purpose of this challenge I am prepared to accept that the event...

6. INZ (Calder) v Shearer [2019] NZIACDT 41 (19 June 2019) [pdf, 286 KB]

   IMMIGRATION ADVISERS COMPLAINTS AND DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL Decision No: [2019] NZIACDT 41 Reference No: IACDT 030/17 IN THE MATTER of a referral under s 48 of the Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007 BY THE REGISTRAR OF IMMIGRATION ADVISERS Registrar BETWEEN IMMIGRATION NEW ZEALAND (DARREN CALDER) Complainant AND MARIA CHARINA (CHARIE) SHEARER Adviser SUBJECT TO SU

7. Mr-Rasheeds-Submissions-Appendix-I-Appendix-II.pdf [pdf, 334 KB]

   APPENDIX I: TABLE OF LIVE ISSUES N o. Issue Proposed category Why further matters beyond the RC process and report must be considered to complete the inquiry: 1 APPENDIX I: TABLE OF LIVE ISSUES 2 How was the terrorist radicalised and how can this be prevented in the future? Outside the scope of the Inquiry (considered by the RCOI). The RC failed to address this point as it did not have clear directive mandate and appropriate resources to examine the individual�

8. Evaluation of Manukau Family Violence Court [pdf, 767 KB]

   ...hearing. Victim Advisers will have also given victims information on Protection Orders, programmes, community support and refuges. A Victim Adviser is present at every FV Court hearing, and will have provided victims’ views to the Judge via a written statement. If complainants are in the court and willing to be identified, the Judge may ask how they feel about the defendant going to a programme. Complainants will also be consulted before bail conditions are varied. When a defendant...

9. Reweti - Part Waikoukou No 406 (2015) 96 Taitokerau MB 231 (96 TTK 231) [pdf, 259 KB]

   ...lost and evidence of its contents is not available. [74] On 5 May 1871 the New Zealand Herald reported on this second meeting between Mr Sheehan and the Kaipara Maori: 28 At the meeting previously held at the Awaroa, Mr Sheehan obtained the consent of the legal owners of the land, but as the whole of these lands are held on behalf of the whole tribe, it was deemed advisable to remove all possibility of future misunderstanding by obtaining the consent of the whole tribe. [75]...

10. Tane v Tanetinorau Opataia Whanau Trust - Hauturu East 7 [2013] Chief Judge's MB 119 (2013 CJ 119) [pdf, 673 KB]

    ...2008 CJMB 339, at [20]. 18 2008 CJMB 339, at [21]. 2013 Chief Judge's ME 124 assume that the applicant wishes to cancel or amend the orders constituting the whenua topii trust and the ahu whenua trust because the beneficial owners did not consent. [19] The respondents state that the busts were established as a result of the W AI 51 settlement between Ruapuha and Uekaha hapii and the Crown. The implementation of the WAI 51 settlement required the Maori Land Court to amalgamat...