4522 items matching your search terms
...LGBTI+ - - - 29.98 - - - 16.21 - - - 18.64 - - - 40.26 # - - - 30.59 LGBTI+ - - - 46.05 ‡ * - - - 32.39 ‡ * - - - 26.96 ‡ * - - - S - - - 62.38 # * Age 15–29 years 37.03 * 35.01 * 34.99 20.47 * 20.45 ‡ * 18.17 ‡ 25.55 * 21.01 25.75 * 51.82 # * 49.15 # * 52.44 # 41.20 * 39.71 47.84 # * 15–19 years 30.20 ‡ 31.25 ‡ 32.12 ‡ 19.42 ‡ 21.70 ‡ 14.36 ‡ 20.05 ‡ 18.06...
...LGBTI+ - - - 29.98 - - - 16.21 - - - 18.64 - - - 40.26 # - - - 30.59 LGBTI+ - - - 46.05 ‡ * - - - 32.39 ‡ * - - - 26.96 ‡ * - - - S - - - 62.38 # * Age 15–29 years 37.03 * 35.01 * 34.99 20.47 * 20.45 ‡ * 18.17 ‡ 25.55 * 21.01 25.75 * 51.82 # * 49.15 # * 52.44 # 41.20 * 39.71 47.84 # * 15–19 years 30.20 ‡ 31.25 ‡ 32.12 ‡ 19.42 ‡ 21.70 ‡ 14.36 ‡ 20.05 ‡ 18.06...
...order Imprisonment 582 573 661 813 922 959 885 839 845 642 32% 32% 34% 36% 37% 38% 35% 34% 33% 29% Breach of protection order Home detention 71 61 91 122 147 167 176 176 188 197 4% 3% 5% 5% 6% 7% 7% 7% 7% 9% Breach of protection order Community detention 101 97 131 145 146 166 198 205 251 235 5% 5% 7% 6% 6% 7% 8% 8% 10% 10% Breach of protection order Intensive supervision 89 84 99 141 171 170 228 295 317 315 5% 5% 5% 6% 7% 7% 9% 12% 12% 14% Breach of protection order Community work 478 451...
...LGBTI+ - - - 29.98 - - - 16.21 - - - 18.64 - - - 40.26 # - - - 30.59 LGBTI+ - - - 46.05 ‡ * - - - 32.39 ‡ * - - - 26.96 ‡ * - - - S - - - 62.38 # * Age 15–29 years 37.03 * 35.01 * 34.99 20.47 * 20.45 ‡ * 18.17 ‡ 25.55 * 21.01 25.75 * 51.82 # * 49.15 # * 52.44 # 41.20 * 39.71 47.84 # * 15–19 years 30.20 ‡ 31.25 ‡ 32.12 ‡ 19.42 ‡ 21.70 ‡ 14.36 ‡ 20.05 ‡ 18.06...
...reparations, infringements, and civil and legal aid debt. We collected over $165.5M in fines in 2021/22. We monitor the performance of seven Crown Entities. We publish the New Zealand Crime and Victims Survey and other justice sector data. Our mahi 1010 Operating in a COVID-19 climate The changing nature of COVID-19 in 2021/22 meant ongoing and significant disruption to the courts and wider justice system. We worked closely with the Judiciary, legal profession, Public Service Ass...
...or enhanced CDD may tip off a customer? 100 Page 15 Why? Please provide more information below 100 Question 4.73: Once suspicion has been formed, should reporting entities have the discretion not to conduct enhanced CDD to avoid tipping off? 101 4.73 Once suspicion has been formed, should reporting entities have the discretion not to conduct enhanced CDD to avoid tipping off? 101 Please provide any further information below 101 Question 4.74: If you answered yes to question 4.73, i...
...Life satisfaction 0 to 6 (least satisfied) 167 21.17 # 35.62 5.93 .‡ * 97 30.01 # 38.41 8.43 .‡ * 67 31.75 # 31.40 7.89 .‡ * 7 147 17.23 25.89 4.12 . * 84 24.02 # 32.41 6.72 .‡ * 60 28.36 # 19.94 4.75 .‡ 8 200 14.56 17.81 2.46 . 101 19.54 18.43 3.27 . 98 20.55 # 17.18 3.27 .‡ 9 96 22.18 # 12.19 2.55 .‡ * 52 33.55 # 13.18 4.12 .‡ * 42 31.40 # 10.87 3.36 .‡ * 10 (most satisfied) 88 20.18 # 10.15 1.96 .‡ * 41 25.57 # 9.02 2.16 .‡ * 47 30.77 # 11.23 3.31...
...Further, the Court directed that three of 77 interrogatories only should be answered. It also discussed and reiterated its previous remarks that a sense of proportionality needed to be maintained, even given the substantial claim for penalties.46 [101] The Court ruled that LSG was entitled to costs on the document disclosure application, and with regard to the service of interrogatories and the cost of successfully objecting to the vast majority of them. [102] LSG submits that a...
............................................................................................................................. 100 Interim Decision ................................................................................................................ 101 5 A: The parties are to address the matters referred to in this decision summarized in paragraphs [397] to [399] to see if agreement can be reached about them. If the parties are unable to agree, they are to provide memoranda...
...levels, 2006, 2009 and 2014 2014 2009 2006 % % % A lot more crime 3.8‡ 6.0 5.1 A little more crime 11.1‡ 17.1 15.9 About the same 62.7 64.6 65.6 A little less crime 9.6‡ 6.9 8.0 A lot less crime 2.8‡ 1.7 1.6 No crime around here 10.1‡ 3.7 3.9 Total 100.0 100.0 100.0 Notes ^, †, ‡ Statistically significant difference across time at the 95% confidence level. ^ from 2009 to 2014; † from 2006 to 2014; ‡ from both 2006 to 2014 and 2009 to 2014 (2006 to 2009...