Search Results

1. Bristol v Ngāti Rangi Trust - Rangiwaea-Tāpiri [2017] Chief Judge's MB 269 (2017 CJ 269) [pdf, 435 KB]

   ...the Tribunal’s findings that Ngāti Rangi, Ngāti Uenuku and Ngāti Tamahaki are all closely related, it is perhaps unsurprising that no objections were received at the time of the earlier proceedings, notwithstanding the claims over notice. [101] That said, in my assessment, the applicants have not provided any further and compelling evidence that, although they have an interest in the land of some kind 56 329 Aotea MB 139-207 (...

2. [2023] NZEnvC 041 Barnhill Corporate Trustee Limited v Queenstown Lakes District Council [pdf, 350 KB]

   ...corresponding rule in 27.6.1; (ii) Subtopic 2, group 3: BDT (ENV-2019-CHC-036): Moderate rated areas proposed by Council within LCU 11 (East of Lower Shotover Road), Pol 24.2.1.1Bb, rr 24.5.1.6.2, 27.5.18Cd and corresponding rule in 27.6.1. 33 [101] Insofar as appeal points in Topic 31 allow scope for the final wording of some specified provisions to be revisited, this decision leaves that for determination in Topic 31. That is part of why we do not make directions at this...

3. Appendix-10_Michael-Thompson_s87F-Report_Water-Take-and-Allocation_28-April-2023.pdf [pdf, 893 KB]

   ...Ngāti Raukawa do not consider that the consent conditions adequately provide for their cultural values, relationships with their ancestral lands, water, waahi tapu, and other taonga, for their kaitiakitanga responsibilities, and their mana. 101. I am not aware of specific matters or concerns raised about, the Waitohu Stream and proposed water take from my review of Section 40 of the Waka Kotahi AEE Volume II (Cultural effects). However, it is beyond the bounds of my expertise or...

4. MK v Accident Compensation Corporation [2024] NZACC 45 (8 March 2024) [pdf, 460 KB]

   ...prior to the enactment of the 2001 Act, ACC could consider a request for social rehabilitation for that period if there was a written application and the relevant entitlement was agreed in an individual rehabilitation plan at the relevant time. [101] On the evidence before me, I conclude that in the appellant’s case, there was no such agreed individual rehabilitation plan at the relevant time, that is from 1999 to 2002. Therefore, I must conclude that the appellant does not have...

5. 2021-02-12 Willowridge Affidavit Alison Devlin Exhibit A [pdf, 20 MB]

   ......................................................................................................... 42 10.0 Vegetation Management ................................................................................................................... 43 10.1 Performance Criteria ......................................................................................................................... 43 10.2 Limit of Clearing ......................................................................

6. Appendix-16-Waka-Kotahi-refinement-of-application-with-attachments.pdf [pdf, 2.7 MB]

   ...enclosed area for pest animal incursions must be undertaken until the completion of the period set out in Table REM10- 110 for a period of two (2) years following eradication of possums, rats, feral cats, feral pigs, hedgehogs and mustelids. Table REM10-1: Lizard Relocation Area Management and Monitoring Period Number of lizards captured and relocated Duration (from relocation of last lizard) Less than twenty (20) lizards Two (2) years Between twenty (20) and fifty (50) lizards Three...

7. Waitangi Tribunal Bibliography Part 1 [pdf, 177 KB]

   ...Tribunal research series (1993), no. 10 1993, 39pp Woodley, Suzanne, Manaia 1C, Coromandel, Waitangi Tribunal research series (1993), no. 11 1993, 61pp Woodley, Suzanne, Matakana Island, Waitangi Tribunal research series (1995), no. 5 1993, 101pp Woodley, Suzanne, Tuhua (Mayor Island), Waitangi Tribunal research series (1993), no. 8 1993, 57pp Waitangi Tribunal occasional publication series (1993) 1. Nikora, Tarah; Bennion, Tom, Maori Land Legislation, 1862–1908 2. Mor...

8. [2013] NZEmpC 60 Snowdon v Radio New Zealand Ltd [pdf, 236 KB]

   ...for costs” of $1,190.61. That invoice is dated 30 June 2011 and refers to charging orders, redrafting memoranda and incidental attendances. This clearly does not cover the period for the adjournment costs which started on 18 July 2011. [101] From the timesheets attached to the 19 January memorandum and excluding the items I was apparently required to exclude and those which apparently related to preparation costs rather than the adjournment costs, as best I can, for the period...

9. QX v ZW LCRO 134/2014 (21 October 2016) [pdf, 159 KB]

   ...2008 [100] The Act came into effect on 1 August 2008. The Act sets up a complaints mechanism to deal with complaints about lawyer conduct after that date. The Committee did not separately address the issue of Ms ZW’s conduct before that date. [101] However as significant events occurred after Ms ZW was retained in mid-2006 but before 1 August 2008, it is necessary to consider whether any conduct issues arise that must be considered under the prior legislation. Legal tests [102]...

10. Liu & Anor v Auckland Council & Ors [2013] NZWHT Auckland 25 [pdf, 257 KB]

    ...necessary, not for the purpose of putting things into rigid legal pigeonholes, but because the process requires consideration of what is reasonable from the point of view of the defendant as well as the point of view of the plaintiff.… [101] In Johnson the plaintiffs argued that the cost of repairs was the normal measure of damages which should apply to their claim against the Council. However Woodhouse J observed that in a number of leaky home