12946 items matching your search terms
LCRO 54/2018 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of the [Area] Standards Committee [X] BETWEEN KJ Applicant AND VW Respondent The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. DECISION Introduction [1] Mr KJ has applied for a review of a decision by the [Area] Standards Committee [X] (the Committee)...
...identify the services as being those contained in a schedule. The schedule refers to: [8.4.1.1] $500 payable “upon registration”, but does not explain what is contemplated by “registration”. 3 [8.4.1.2] A further $1,500 for “Application for Work Permit or Lodging of Expression of Interest – Whichever comes first payable upon lodging of application.” [8.4.2] The agreement provides that if the agreement is terminated by the client, then all fees become p...
...B (“the substantive decision”).1 [2] Counsel for the parties have agreed that penalty may be determined on the papers. The Tribunal has received submissions as to penalty. [3] The Tribunal is also required to determine the defendant’s application for a permanent order non-publication of his name and identifying details. Counsel’s submissions on penalty have included their submissions on this issue. The Tribunal notes that a permanent non-publication order of Ms A’s n...
...Jackie to read the police summary of the events of that night. Tama was asked firstly if he agreed with the police account and to tell those at the conference what happened. Tama agreed with the summary and spoke briefly about it. His father, Tane, requested more detail. At this time, Tama’s minimal responses were incomprehensible due to his tears and sniffing. He said, ‘I didn’t really want to do it…when I looked at him…I just pushed him up against the till’. Encouraged...
...responses, it is the case for the plaintiff that that choice is for the employer not the Authority or Court. [8] In making these submissions, Ms Jenkins did not refer to the Court of Appeal judgment of White v Auckland District Health Board4 on the application for leave to appeal from the Employment Court decision in X v Auckland District Health Board. In the Employment Court Chief Judge Colgan agreed with the interpretation of s103A and its effects in practice as set out in Hudson...
NEW ZEALAND LAWYERS AND CONVEYANCERS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2017] NZLCDT 40 LCDT 013/10 UNDER The Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 BETWEEN HAWKE’S BAY STANDARDS COMMITTEE Applicant AND RICHARD HENRY HILL Respondent CHAIR Judge D F Clarkson MEMBERS Mr C Lucas Ms C Rowe Ms S Sage Mr W Smith HEARING 13 December 2017 HELD AT Auckland DATE OF DECISION 22 December 2017 COUNSEL Mr P Collins for the...
NEW ZEALAND LAWYERS AND CONVEYANCERS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2024] NZLCDT 2 LCDT 023/23 IN THE MATTER of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 BETWEEN CANTERBURY WESTLAND STANDARDS COMMITTEE 1 Applicant AND CHRISTOPHER BRADLEIGH PERSSON Respondent CHAIR Ms D Clarkson MEMBERS OF TRIBUNAL Mr G McKenzie Ms M Noble Ms S Sage Ms P Walker MNZM HEARING 14 December 2023 HELD AT Remote hearing by MS Teams DATE OF DECISION 9...
NEW ZEALAND LAWYERS AND CONVEYANCERS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2023] NZLCDT 46 LCDT 007/23 IN THE MATTER of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 BETWEEN NATIONAL STANDARDS COMMITTEE 1 Applicant AND UMAR ABDUL KUDDUS Respondent DEPUTY CHAIR Dr J Adams MEMBERS OF TRIBUNAL Mr G McKenzie Prof D Scott Ms N Taefi Ms P Walker MNZM HEARING 29 September 2023 HELD AT Specialist Courts and Tribunals Centre, Auckland DATE OF DECI...
...AND CONVEYANCERS ACT 2006. NEW ZEALAND LAWYERS AND CONVEYANCERS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2022] NZLCDT 55 LCDT 001/22 IN THE MATTER of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 BETWEEN AUCKLAND STANDARDS COMMITTEE 1 Applicant AND JUSTIN CHRISTOPHER HARDER Respondent CHAIR Ms D Clarkson MEMBERS OF TRIBUNAL Hon. P Heath KC Ms S Hughes KC Prof D Scott Ms S Stuart HEARING 6 December 2022 HELD AT Specialist Courts and Tribunals C...
BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2011] NZREADT 30 READT 061/11 IN THE MATTER OF an appeal under s.111 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 BETWEEN PAUL JACKMAN Applicant AND COMPLAINTS ASSESSMENT COMMITTEE (CAC 10100) First respondent AND DAVID ANDERSON Second respondent MEMBERS OF TRIBUNAL Judge P F Barber - Chairperson Mr J Gaukrodger - Member Mr G Denley - Member HEARD at WELLINGTON on 13 October 2011 DATE OF...