Search Results

1. [2008] NZEmpC WC 19A/08 Snowdon v Radio New Zealand Ltd [pdf, 45 KB]

   SNOWDON V RADIO NEW ZEALAND LTD WN WC 19A/08 11 December 2008 IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT WELLINGTON WC 19A/08 WRC 27/08 IN THE MATTER OF an application for a compliance order AND IN THE MATTER OF an application by the defendant for an order striking out the plaintiff's statement of claim BETWEEN LYNNE FRANCES SNOWDON Plaintiff AND RADIO NEW ZEALAND LIMITED Defendant Hearing: 12 November 2008 (Heard at Wellington) Appearances: R A Moodie, Cou...

2. Reekie v Corrections (Extension of Time) [2018] NZHRRT 15 [pdf, 73 KB]

   ...Regulations 2002 provides that a defendant who intends to defend proceedings must, within 30 days after the day on which the notice of proceedings is served on him or her, file in the office of the Tribunal a statement of reply to the plaintiff’s claim and must serve a copy of the statement of reply on the plaintiff and any other party. [2] In the present case the statement of reply was due to be filed on 20 April 2018. 1 [This decis...

3. [2023] NZEmpC 160 A Labour Inspector of the Ministry of Business, Innovation, and Employment v Airways Corp of New Zealand Ltd [pdf, 113 KB]

   ...Defendant Hearing: On the papers Appearances: G La Hood, counsel for plaintiff G Davenport, counsel for defendants Judgment: 25 September 2023 CONSENT JUDGMENT OF JUDGE B A CORKILL [1] In the statement of claim filed by the plaintiff in this case, it sought declarations under s 6(5) of the Employment Relations Act 2000 (the Act) in respect of three individuals, one of whom was Stuart Balchin. It was alleged he was an employee of either or bot...

4. KT & NT v N Ltd [2024] NZDT 374 (31 May 2024) [pdf, 178 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 374 APPLICANT KT APPLICANT NT RESPONDENT N Ltd The Tribunal orders: N Ltd is to pay $2,587.50 to KT and NT by the 21st June 2024. Reasons 1. KT and NT contracted N Ltd to lay concrete at their home. Whilst laying concrete on the driveway adjacent to the garage, concrete was splashed on to the new garage door. The same day as the p

5. QC v S Ltd [2024] NZDT 549 (19 July 2024) [pdf, 184 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 549 APPLICANT QC RESPONDENT S Ltd The Tribunal orders: S Ltd is to pay QC $90.00 on or before 16 August 2024. Reasons 1. In about February 2024, QC won [an online] auction for a torque wrench from S Ltd trading as YD. He had won other items from this seller previously and the seller agreed to hold them all for him until he could pi...

6. L Ltd v N Ltd [2022] NZDT 247 (30 November 2022) [pdf, 236 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 247 APPLICANT L Ltd RESPONDENT N Ltd The Tribunal orders: N Ltd is to pay L Ltd $15,000.00 by 12 December 2022. Background 1. L Ltd is a retail jeweller with shops in New Zealand. 2. N Ltd is an insurance company based in [City]. 3. At N Ltd.’s request, L Ltd provided a valuation for items of jewellery....

7. LL v KN [2024] NZDT 369 (27 June 2024) [pdf, 173 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 369 APPLICANT LL RESPONDENT KN The Tribunal orders: KN is to pay LL $560.00 on or before 18 July 2024. Reasons 1. LL entered into a flatmate agreement with KN from September 2023 to May 2024. After the contract ended KN refused to refund LL’s bond because of concerns about damage to the house. 2. LL claims a refund of her bon...

8. IT & NH v UN Ltd [2022] NZDT 163 (25 October 2022) [pdf, 257 KB]

   ...$1,240.00 (50%) as a deposit. When the model was available, Mr O of the Responder sent photos of the model to the Applicants. The Applicants were not happy with the results and refused to pay the remainder. They asked for a refund. They then filed a claim for a refund in the Disputes Tribunal. The Respondent filed a counterclaim for the amount outstanding. 2. This is a claim for a refund and a counterclaim for the remaining balance to be paid, both in the sum of $1,240.00....

9. BD v ED [2020] NZDT 1383 (17 December 2020) [pdf, 180 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2020] NZDT 1383 APPLICANT BD RESPONDENT ED The Tribunal orders: 1. The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. BD purchased a power meter from ED on a website titled “CT”. He alleges ED misrepresented the condition of the power meter and broke the rules of CT by refusing to refund the money he paid for the power meter. He claim...

10. QL v E Ltd [2023] NZDT 752 (1 December 2023) [pdf, 182 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 752 APPLICANT QL RESPONDENT E Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. QL purchased two laminated Gortex motorcycle jackets from E Ltd on 2 February 2022, one for himself and one for a friend. 2. On 4 July 2023, QL was out on a 3 day ride and noticed that a small patch on the front of one of the wrist cuffs had d...