Search Results

Search results for claim form.

12972 items matching your search terms

  1. IH & KH v B Ltd [2024] NZDT 820 (21 October 2024) [pdf, 92 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 820 APPLICANT IH and KH RESPONDENT RESPONDENT INSURER B Ltd O Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reason 1. On or about 2 April 2024 Mr T was driving the car belonging to IH on a shared driveway when he says a stone struck the windscreen. The claim is the stone struck the windscreen having been flicked up from g...

  2. C Ltd & B Ltd v SU [2024] NZDT 28 (1 February 2024) [pdf, 153 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 28 APPLICANT C Ltd B Ltd RESPONDDNT SU The Tribunal orders: 1. B Ltd is joined as an applicant to this claim. 2. The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. In October 2022, B Ltd provided a quote to SU for the re-roofing of a property in [Town]. 2. Between February and April 2023 there were some further discussions be...

  3. Wong-Kam v Barron [2014] NZWHT Auckland 3 [pdf, 76 KB]

    IN THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL TRI-2010-100-000098 [2014] NZWHT AUCKLAND 03 BETWEEN ANTHONY WONG-KAM Applicant for Costs Respondent 16 in original claim AND GILLIAN ANNE BARRON Second Respondent in original claim Decision: 21 March 2014 COSTS DETERMINATION Adjudicator: P A McConnell 2 INTRODUCTION [1] Anthony Wong-Kam, the sixteenth respondent, in the original claim, seeks a costs award against Gillian Barron, the second respondent....

  4. KT & others v ON & UN [2019] NZDT 1564 (6 March 2019) [pdf, 208 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2019] NZDT 1564 APPLICANT KT APPLICANT and Respondent to counter claim LQ APPLICANT OT APPLICANT XT RESPONDENT and Applicant to counter claim ON SECOND RESPONDENT UN The Tribunal hereby orders: 1. LQ is to pay ON $425.00 on or before 20 March 2019. Reasons: 1. LQ, OT, and XT and KT brought...

  5. The Estate of UB v KM [2020] NZDT 1322 (3 December 2020) [pdf, 191 KB]

    ...(Property) which at the hearing AH said was owned jointly by AH and AH’s mother, UB (who passed away in October 2020). However, it transpires that the Property was owned solely by UB. 2. KM was engaged to do painting work at the Property. AH claims the work done was substandard. 3. When the claim was lodged AH had an enduring power of attorney to act on behalf of her mother who had dementia. By the time of the last hearing her mother had passed away (as mentioned above). AH is an...

  6. Enforcing judgments more than 6 years old

    ...you, or the court, have received a payment from the debtor or someone else on their behalf in the last 12 months. Apply for approval (leave of the court) You need to apply to the district court where the judgment order was made. Fill in the form:Application to enforce a judgment over 6 years Pay the feeOn the application you can ask for the fee to be added to what the debtor owes. Cost you can claimCivil Enforcement Fees Find a district court

  7. ADC v ZWY [2009] NZDT 199 (31 July 2009) [pdf, 76 KB]

    IN THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2009] NZDT 199 BETWEEN ADC APPLICANT AND ZWY RESPONDENT Date of Order: 31 July 2009 Referee: Referee ter Haar ORDER OF THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL The Tribunal hereby orders that ZWY’s claim against ADC is dismissed, and ADC’s counterclaim is successful. ZWY is ordered to pay ADC the sum of $223.44 within ten days of the date of this order. Facts [1] ADC and ZWY were engaged...

  8. BN & KN as trustees for the N Trust v I Ltd [2024] NZDT 188 (8 February 2024) [pdf, 182 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 188 APPLICANT BN and KN as trustees for the N Trust RESPONDENT I Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. BN and KN are to pay I Ltd $2,827.56 within 28 days. Reasons [1] BN and KN claim from I Ltd, represented by TN, $2,697.07. The Ns say that this sum is owing for unprocessed [nuts] that were provided to I Ltd before th...

  9. BP v YK [2015] NZDT 795 (13 July 2015) [pdf, 67 KB]

    IN THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2015] NZDT 795 BETWEEN BP APPLICANT AND YK RESPONDENT Date of Order: 13 July 2015 Referee: Referee Paton-Simpson ORDER OF THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL The Tribunal hereby orders that the claim is struck out. Reasons: [1] The parties were in a de facto relationship for around six years. During the relationship, YK established a family trust known as the ABC Trust, with her three sons as the beneficiaries. The...

  10. EX v QU [2023] NZDT 457 (18 August 2023) [pdf, 100 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 457 APPLICANT EX RESPONDENT QU The Tribunal orders: 1. The claim is dismissed 2. The counterclaim is dismissed. Reasons: Introduction: 1. In July of 2022, EX first spoke to QU about building a new lawn and garden at his home. In September of 2022, QU provided a quote accepted by EX, and the work...