12959 items matching your search terms
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 394 APPLICANT EQ RESPONDENT FI Ltd The Tribunal orders: The Respondent party is corrected to be FI Ltd. The claim by EQ is dismissed. Reasons 1. EQ filed a claim for the cost of a second set of car keys against HU, a salesman at FI Ltd. At the hearing, it was agreed that FI Ltd was the correct respondent party...
This diagram shows the process a claim goes through, from application to outcome. You can find a more detailed explanation of the Tribunal process later in this section and in the Homeowners' Guide (link below). Things to note: We'll let you know when your claim has been received. This is does not mean your claim has been accepted. You and your insurer can reach a settlement at any stage in the process. At each stage in the process, you’ll be kept informed of the next steps and what you need...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 420 APPLICANT KH RESPONDEN T N Ltd The Tribunal orders: KH is to pay N Ltd the sum of $18,711.24 within 21 days of the date of this order. Reasons 1. The applicant contracted the respondent to transport a mobile home from [City 1] in the [Country] to [City 2] (“the freight service”). 2. The respondent invoiced the applic...
...file. [3] That request was made pursuant to s 147 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 (the Act). [4] That section is commonly relied on by a Standards Committee when it decides, in the course of a conduct inquiry, that it requires further information from the practitioner. [5] Mr ZM did not comply with the s 147 request. 2 [6] In due course, charges were laid with the New Zealand Lawyers and Conveyancers Disciplinary Tribunal (the Tribunal). [7] One of the charges was...
...cancelling roadway and laying out new roadway made at 5 Tākitimu MB 239-247 on 12 November 2010 and made at 40 Tākitimu MB 16-18 on 6 May 2015 KOHINE RATA, PHILLIP HUTANA, LILY WILCOX and HENARE HUTANA Ngā Kaitono Applicants Nohoanga: Hearing 9 December 2019, 2019 Chief Judge’s MB 1493-1518 (Heard at Hastings) Whakataunga: Judgment date 7 February 2020 TE WHAKATAUNGA Ā KAIWHAKAWĀ MATUA TUARUA C L FOX Judgment of De...
...complainants to apply for visas. At the time they were in New Zealand unlawfully, as their visas had expired some years before. Mr Letalu agreed to apply under a discretionary provision for visas. The allegations are that he: [2.1] Failed to lodge the request promptly, and then lodged an unsatisfactory request. [2.2] He charged too much for the work he did. [2.3] He issued an invoice, which had the wrong GST rate, and double charged GST. [2.4] He failed to tell his clients when the re...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 16 APPLICANT LN RESPONDENT JH Ltd The Tribunal orders: JH Ltd is to pay the sum of $22.00 to LN on or before 11 March 2022. Reasons: 1. On 28 May 2021, LN and his wife travelled from [City A] to [City B] on a bus, having purchased tickets from the JH Ltd. LN was very unhappy with the service, and now claims a refund o...
...Plan 3020 and Section 2 Survey Office Plan 339948 and Others (Shelly Bay) I WAENGA I A Between MIKE TE WHAREHURU GILBERT, MARTHA HINEONE GLIBERT, KAREN MARAMA PARATA, MABEL URU TANIRAU AND ROGAN RAWIRI HAHOPE TANIRAU Ngā Kaitono Applicants Nohoanga: Hearings 6 August 2021, 441 Aotea MB 117-146 (Heard at Wellington) 31 January 2023, 461 Aotea MB 49 Kanohi kitea: Appearances Whakataunga: Judgment date C Hockly for Applicants T Cooley for Firs...
...Dr NR Swain, Member REPRESENTATION: Dr CA Sawyer in person Ms M Scholtens KC and Mr G Davenport for defendant DATE OF HEARING: Heard on the papers DATE OF DECISION: 25 September 2024 DECISION OF TRIBUNAL STRIKING OUT CLAIM1 [1] Dr Sawyer was employed as a law lecturer by Victoria University of Wellington (VUW). In August 2016, following an employment dispute, Dr Sawyer filed a claim that alleged VUW had breached a range of information privacy princi...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 6 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 139 APPLICANT ET APPLICANT HT RESPONDENT SX The Tribunal orders: SX is to pay $5,979.88 to ET and HT by the 8th April 2024. Reasons 1. ET and HT purchased [dog], a [pedigree breed] bitch from SX for breeding purposes in late 2019 for a price of $3000. Two years later following the observation of health issues after [dog