Search Results

1. Minhinnick v The Crown - Maioro Lands (1994) 18 Waikato Maniapoto Appellate MB 220 (18 APWM 220) [pdf, 3.8 MB]

   ...Court of New Zealand Waikato Maniapoto District J! _ Waikato Maniapoto Appellate Court Minute Book folio __ ~~9 __ _ CORAM: APPEARANCES: DECISION: Case Stated 1990/1 IN THE MATTER of the Treaty ofWaitangi Act 1979 IN THE MATTER of the claim to the Waitangi Tribunal by Nganeko Mil1hinnick on behalf of herself and Ngati Te Ata in respect of Maioro Lands H K Hingston (Presiding Judge) G D Carter (Judge) H g; Marumaru (Judge) Claimant a cross-claim by Ngaire Ni...

2. [2014] NZEmpC 44 Fox v Hereworth School Trust Board No3 interlocutory [pdf, 74 KB]

   ...WELLINGTON [2014] NZEmpC 44 [14 March 2014] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT WELLINGTON [2014] NZEmpC 44 WRC 5/13 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER of an application for disclosure of documents by a non-party BETWEEN EMMA YUEN SEE FOX Plaintiff AND HEREWORTH SCHOOL TRUST BOARD Defendant Hearing: On documents filed on 10 March 2014 Appearances: B Sc...

3. Mauve v Oranga Tamariki [2024] NZHRRT 38 [pdf, 306 KB]

   ...2 [1] Ms Mauve provided foster care for a child placed in her care by Oranga Tamariki. However, in May 2018, Oranga Tamariki removed the child from Ms Mauve’s care. [2] Aggrieved by that decision, Ms Mauve made an information privacy request to Oranga Tamariki under the Privacy Act 19932 (‘the Act’). [3] Oranga Tamariki provided Ms Mauve with some of her personal information but refused to provide her with access to other information that it held. Ms Mauve claims that...

4. AQ v ZI LCRO 105 / 2010 (11 February 2011) [pdf, 106 KB]

   ...105/2010 CONCERNING An application for review pursuant to Section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of the Auckland Standards Committee Number 2 BETWEEN AQ of Auckland Applicant AND ZI of Auckland Respondent The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. DECISION Background [1] In July 2008, the firm of AAM (AAM) was instructed by the Applicant on...

5. Apply to write off your legal aid debt

   On this page: What is a write off? How do I apply for a write off? What grounds can I apply for a write off under? Reasons that don't meet the criteria for a write off What if I disagree with the decision made on my application? What is a write off? If a legal aid debt is written off in full, you won’t have to pay the remainder of that debt. Sometimes a partial write off will be approved. This means the debt will be reduced, but you’ll still have to pay back a certain amount. How do I appl...

   Located in:

   1. Courts >
   2. Going to court >
   3. Legal aid >
   4. Do you need to pay back your legal aid?

6. Bayne - Great Barrier Island [2016] Chief Judge's MB 764 (2016 CJ 764) [pdf, 451 KB]

   ...COURT OF NEW ZEALAND TAITOKERAU DISTRICT A20140012567 CJ 2014/42 UNDER Section 45, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Great Barrier Island (all the islands and rock outcrops in the environs of Aotea) ERANA HEMOATA BAYNE Applicant Judgment: 22 August 2016 DECISION OF CHIEF JUDGE W W ISAAC 2016 Chief Judge’s MB 765 Introduction [1] This application filed b...

7. [2023] NZEmpC 94 Soapi v Pick Hawke’s Bay Inc [pdf, 255 KB]

   ...OF NEW ZEALAND WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2023] NZEmpC 94 EMPC 197/2022 IN THE MATTER OF proceedings removed from the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER OF an application for security for costs AND IN THE MATTER OF applications for leave to intervene BETWEEN LYN SOAPI First Plaintiff AND DANNY LAU Second Plaintiff AND MARY LAU Third Plaintiff AND...

8. [2010] NZEmpC 131 Rooney Earthmoving Ltd v McTague & Ors [pdf, 25 KB]

   ...significantly and may have also impacted upon the discovery exercise. However, it is only because of the way in which the legislature has approached the matter in the Employment Relations Act 2000 that litigation involving both contractual and tortious claims against the same ex-employees and the company they may have formed are not heard in the same court. Some of the difficulties that are presented by the parallel proceedings in this case would have been avoided if they all coul...

9. AF v FG & TI [2024] NZDT 347 (24 April 2024) [pdf, 158 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 6 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 347 APPLICANT AF RESPONDENT FG SECOND RESPONDENT TI The Tribunal orders: 1. AF is to pay FG and TI $3,314.08 on or before 31 May 2024. 2. AF is the owner of and is entitled to possession of [the dog]. 3. FG and TI are to make [the dog] available to be collected by AF or her nominee no later than three working days af...

10. Pomare v Rangihaeata - Hongoeka 7 (2009) 16 Whanganui Appellate Court MB 88 (16 WGAP 88) [pdf, 420 KB]

    ...made. Background [3] In 1964 the Court laid out a roadway over a number of Hongoeka blocks ("the legal roadway"). The legal roadway is the only legal access into Hongoeka Bay. The legal roadway crosses a beach area and has never been formed. [4] A roadway providing access to Hongoeka Bay was formed over Hongoeka 7, Lots 2 and 3 DP 42094 (land owned by Ian Harwood in general freehold title) and other blocks ("the formed roadway"). The formed roadway is currently...