Search Results

Search results for claim form.

12941 items matching your search terms

  1. SL v QU [2023] NZDT 677 (16 December 2023) [pdf, 190 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 677 APPLICANT SL RESPONDENT QU The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. In February 2022, SL purchased a used imported [vehicle] advertised as having 57,100 km, for $20,600.00. 2. SL claims $23,269.74, being a refund of the purchase price and the balance in costs he says are associated with the maintenance and...

  2. NN v IQ [2022] NZDT 250 (6 December 2022) [pdf, 100 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 250 APPLICANT NN RESPONDENT IQ The Tribunal orders: IQ is to pay NN $1500.00 by 22/12/2022 Reasons: 1. NN was offered a [car] from her friend IQ for $3500. They discussed aspects of the car and the deal and NN took it for a short test drive. 2. IQ told her the CV joint was faulty and she would have it replaced the...

  3. SI v NI & DI [2022] NZDT 218 (29 November 2022) [pdf, 104 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 218 APPLICANT SI RESPONDENT NI SECOND RESPONDENT DI The Tribunal orders: a. The claim against NI was withdrawn at the start of the hearing and is dismissed. b. DI is to pay to SI $6,500.00 by 16 January 2023. Reasons: 1. Today’s hearing was a rehearing of the dispute which means it starts afresh fr...

  4. Mok v Boyd [2011] NZWHT Auckland 1 [pdf, 94 KB]

    ...Respondent (Nicola Boyd removed) AND CRAIG TIBBITS Second Respondent AND ALAN BOLDERSON Third Respondent AND MICHAEL GREGORY MAY Fourth Respondent DECISION ON COSTS Adjudicator: S Pezaro 18 January 2011 Page | 2 APPLICATIONS FOR COSTS [1] Craig Tibbits, the second respondent, seeks an award of costs against Blake Boyd, the first respondent. Alan Bolderson, the third respondent, and Michael May, the fourth respondent, apply for an order of c...

  5. Savage v Accident Compensation Corporation (Leave to appeal to the High Court) [2024] NZACC 083 [pdf, 273 KB]

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2024] NZACC 083 ACR 199/22 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL UNDER SECTION 162(1) OF THE ACT BETWEEN GRAHAME SAVAGE Applicant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Submissions: Applicant is self-represented H Ifwersen and R Hindriksen for respondent Hearing: On the papers J...

  6. Fisher v Fisher - Mura Rattenbury [2013] Chief Judge's MB 272 (2013 CJ 272) [pdf, 395 KB]

    2013 Chief Judge's MB 272 IN THE MAoRI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AOTEA DISTRICT Hearing: A20090004324 CJ2009/9 UNDER Section 45, Te Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Mura Rattenbury BETWEEN CORRIENE FISHER Applicant AND 8 October 2012 (Heard at Wellington) NEVILLE FISHER Respondent Appearances: Coniene Fisher, Applicant Judgment: 22 May 2013 DECISION OF CHIEF JUDGE W W ISAAC 2013 Chief Judge's MB 273 Introduction [1] This application, fi...

  7. QB v OL [2021] NZDT 1563 (7 December 2021) [pdf, 164 KB]

    ...something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehearing, you can apply online, download a form from the Disputes Tribunal website or obtain an application form from any Tribunal office. The application must be lodged within 20 working days of the decision having been made. If you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Reheari...

  8. Overview Trustee Ltd as trustee of the Carrigafoyle Trust v Cook & Anor as trustees of the CC Trust [2011] NZWHT Auckland 35 [pdf, 309 KB]

    ...one expert was not being called shortly before the hearing commenced. Experts met only during the hearing period. If documentation had been prepared on time an experts‟ conference before the hearing may have been possible and would have informed the assessor of the differing views contrary to his. This would have especially applied once he was advised as to the application of Xypex coating in lieu of paint or plaster. Calderbank letter [11] In August 2008 all the responde...

  9. LCRO 13/2024 OB and HG v NC (12 June 2024) [pdf, 228 KB]

    ...[2024] NZLCRO 069 Ref: LCRO 13/2024 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a decision of the [Area] Standards Committee [X] BETWEEN OB and HG Applicants AND NC Respondent The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. DECISION Introduction [1] The applicants, Ms OB and Mr HG, have applied for review of a decision by t...

  10. KIT v Zhu [2019] NZIACDT 34 (20 May 2019) [pdf, 176 KB]

    ...complainant personally applied for a visitor visa online. An interim visa was granted by Immigration New Zealand on 26 October, to come into effect when the working holiday visa expired and to expire when a decision was made on her visitor visa application. [5] The complainant’s working holiday visa expired on 2 or 3 November 2016. At about this time, she approached Pioneer to obtain entry to an education institute and an accompanying student visa. On 3 November, she signed a...