Mabruk v The Real Estate Agents Authority (CAC 409) and Watson (not participating in appeal) [2018] NZREADT 74 [pdf, 215 KB]
...would be counted as an aggravating circumstance.9 [21] The Committee also considered the position of Mr Lindsay (branch manager) and Mr Dickason (salesperson). It referred to the Agency’s statement (provided in a statement by the Agency’s Human Resources manager) that Mr Mabruk was supervised by both Mr Lindsay and Mr Dickason. [22] With respect to Mr Lindsay, the Committee noted the Agency’s statement that Mr Mabruk was supervised by both Mr Dickason and Mr Lindsay. After...