2763 items matching your search terms
1 IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2018] NZHRRT 25 Reference No. HRRT 025/2016 UNDER THE PRIVACY ACT 1993 BETWEEN YAN GUO PLAINTIFF AND STEPHEN JAMES CULPAN DEFENDANT AT AUCKLAND BEFORE: Ms MA Roche, Co-Chairperson Dr SJ Hickey MNZM, Member Mr RK Musuku, Member REPRESENTATION: Ms Yan Guo in person Ms HC Stuart for defendant DATE OF HEARING: 14 May 2018 DATE OF DECISION: 19 June 2018 DECISION OF TRIBUNAL...
...the content you are complaining about WHY YOU ARE COMPLAINING ABOUT THE CONTENT – PLEASE COMPLETE EITHER SECTION (A) OR (B) EITHER SECTION (A) Please tell me why you think this content breaks the law. For example, has it breached your privacy? OR SECTION (B) Please say which communication principle the content breaches (circle at least one) 1. It discloses sensitive personal facts about another individual. 2. It is threatening, intimidating or menacing. 3. It is grossly...
...application form • your completed statutory declaration • a full curriculum vitae If posting it, it will assist in processing your application if you do not bind your curriculum vitae or place it in any kind of folder. Under the terms of the Privacy Act 1993, we are required to inform you that: • The information you provide is being collected to assess your suitability for appointment to the New Zealand Parole Board • The information may be checked by reference to the r...
...prevail . CASE STUDIES 4. In your Overview to the on-line January 2019 consultation document ( Third Subheading : Information about Third Parties ) you report that the case study approach to better management has not been allowed on grounds of privacy under the founding Family Court Act 1980 . This is the first time I have seen a Family Court Review provide this comment . 5. For previous Reviews I have made submissions concerning myself , mothers , fathers , children , and grandpa...
...who are not resident in New Zealand. 10. The Bill also proposes a public register, which would require the land owner caught by it to make public their name, their country of origin and the value of their land purchase in New Zealand. The loss of privacy in publicising this information is sufficient to constitute a material disadvantage. 11. I therefore consider cl 4 of the Bill is a prima facie case of discrimination on the grounds of national origins which creates a material disadvan...
...proceedings without the disclosure of any more information about the private lives of individuals, or matters that are commercially sensitive, than is necessary to satisfy the principle of open justice: (d) the protection of other confidentiality and privacy interests (including those of children and other vulnerable members of the community) and any privilege held by, or available to, any person: (e) the principle of open justice (including the encouragement of fair and accurate rep...
...returned the wrong hard drive. On 12 July, QU Ltd apologised for the error, agreed to refund the service fee, and offered a discount on future purchases. 9. On 31 July, TE requested compensation of $10,000.00 saying she had suffered a great loss of privacy, material, and documents. CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 2 of 5 10. On 10 August, QU Ltd emailed TE, again apologising for the errors that lead to the loss of her hard drive. It said it failed to obtain signed confirmation of h...
...8. Section 21 of the Bill of Rights Act affirms that everyone has the right to be secure against unreasonable search and seizure, whether of the person, property, correspondence or otherwise. The right protects a number of values including personal privacy, dignity, and property." The touchstone of this section is a reasonable expectation of privacy. 3 9. New section 36A provides that an enforcement officer who believes on reasonable grounds that a person has been or is camping in a...
Reference No. HRRT 013/2020 UNDER THE PRIVACY ACT 2020 BETWEEN ROSIE MORUNGA PLAINTIFF AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS DEFENDANT AT AUCKLAND BEFORE: Mr J S Hancock, Deputy Chairperson Ms S Kai Fong, Member Dr N R Swain, Member REPRESENTATION: Mr C J Tennet for plaintiff Mr D P Neild and Ms V N Rea for defendants DATE OF HEARING: Heard on the papers DATE OF DECISION: 18 September 2023 DECISION OF TRIBUNAL1 [1...
1 (1) ORDER PREVENTING SEARCH OF THE TRIBUNAL FILE WITHOUT LEAVE OF THE TRIBUNAL OR OF THE CHAIRPERSON IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2020] NZHRRT 14 Reference No. HRRT 011/2016 UNDER THE PRIVACY ACT 1993 BETWEEN BRIAN GREGORY MULLANE PLAINTIFF AND ATTORNEY-GENERAL DEFENDANT AT WELLINGTON BEFORE: Mr RPG Haines ONZM QC, Chairperson REPRESENTATION: Mr BG Mullane in person Ms D Harris for defendant DATE OF HEARING: H...