Search Results

1. Witana v Capill - Otarihau 2B1C (2025) 289 Taitokerau MB 168 (289 TTK 168) [pdf, 217 KB]

   ...injustice to the trustees if I grant the interim injunction but then discharge it in the substantive proceeding.5 5 Wellington International Airport Ltd v Air New Zealand Ltd HC Wellington CIV-2007-485-1756, 30 July 2008 and Cayne v Global Natural Resources Plc [1984] 1 All ER 225 (CA). 289 Taitokerau MB 172 [17] The notice for the AGM advertises an election of trustees. Ms Witana argues that she and other owners will suffer irreparable harm if the AGM proceeds, and the ele...

2. [2025] NZEmpC 46 LMN v STC [pdf, 173 KB]

   ...“incessant filing of various pleadings and complaints … in this and various other jurisdictions” has resulted in the defendant incurring significant legal fees to defend itself in this proceeding and other proceedings. The defendant’s resources are dwindling. It seeks to limit its legal costs where possible. (c) The defendant has been prejudiced by delays. Extending the date for payment of the security for costs by five months would further prejudice it. (d) The defe...

3. [2025] NZEmpC 8  Berryman v Fonterra Cooperative Group Limited [pdf, 155 KB]

   CARL BERRYMAN v FONTERRA COOPERATIVE GROUP LIMITED [2025] NZEmpC 8 [24 January 2025] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2025] NZEmpC 8 EMPC 60/2024 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER OF an application to adduce further evidence BETWEEN CARL BERRYMAN Plaintiff AND FONTERRA COOPERATIVE

4. XH v T Ltd [2024] NZDT 410 (2 May 2024) [pdf, 199 KB]

   ...outcome to be that XH compensates T Ltd $287.50 for the time that it spent prior to the contract being cancelled. This is for the following reasons: a. T Ltd had not performed the carpet laying services in the contract. It had however utilised resource making four visits to the client site as follows: i. Visit 1 on 27 October 2023 to assess the job and provide a quote. I do not find that is reasonable for T Ltd to be compensated for this visit as it would have incurred this cost r...

5. Members of the tribunal

   ...Authority (past, 5 years).  She is a Sitting Board Member of the Advertising Standards Authority Complaints Board and sits on the ASA Codes Committee.  Kenneth Raureti (Rotorua) Mr Raureti has extensive experience in the area of Human Resources and Employment Relations. He currently owns a Mediation, Business Management Services Consultancy Business. He has well-established professional relationships and extensive networks within the business community, Tourism, Iwi and Hapu Auth...

   Located in:

   1. Tribunals >
   2. Lawyers & conveyancers >
   3. Lawyers & Conveyancers Disciplinary Tribunal >
   4. About the tribunal

6. Randle v Accident Compensation Corporation (Leave to appeal to the High Court) [2025] NZACC 068 (29 April 2025) [pdf, 183 KB]

   ...construed or interpreted and applied to the facts is a question of law … . [25] Even if the qualifying criteria are made out, the Court has an extensive discretion in the grant or refusal of leave so as to ensure proper use of scarce judicial resources. Leave is not to be granted as a matter of course. One factor in the grant of leave is the wider importance of any contended point of law … . [8] In Gilmore,4 Dunningham J stated: [55] I accept that, for the purposes of leave,...

7. Budget 2023 - Ministry of Justice | Te Tāhū o te Ture

   Justice Cluster approach The Justice Cluster was one of two pilots established for Budget 2022, with the aim of supporting more efficient and effective cross sector investment beyond the annual Budget cycle. The multi-year funding approach is designed to deliver improved and enduring wellbeing outcomes for New Zealanders. For justice sector agencies, the focus is on four priorities: Better outcomes for victims Improving access to justice Addressing issues with remand Better enabled organisation

   Located in:

   1. About >
   2. News & media >
   3. News

8. Criminal justice and victims

   This regulatory area oversees justice system mechanisms for dealing with crimes. The State holds a critical coercive power in the prosecution and punishment of crimes. Consequently, the definition of crime and the exercising of that power is closely regulated. The number of systems in place to some extent reflects the increasing globalisation of criminal processes and changing technology. At the same time, the justice system’s treatment of crimes and offenders needs to be mindful of the needs

   Located in:

   1. Justice sector & policy >
   2. Regulatory stewardship >
   3. Regulatory systems and areas

9. [2025] NZEmpC 211 Da Hai Investment Ltd v Lebreton [pdf, 188 KB]

   ...list of factors:7 2 Employment Relations Act 2000, s 180. 3 Duncan v Osborne Building Ltd (1992) 6 PRNZ 85 (CA) at 87. 4 Employment Court Regulations 2000, reg 64. 5 Grove v Archibald [1998] 2 ERNZ 125 (EmpC) at 128–129. 6 Bathurst Resources Ltd v L &M Coal Holdings Ltd [2020] NZCA 186, (2020) 25 PRNZ 341 at [19]. 7 Assured Financial Peace Ltd v Pais [2010] NZEmpC 50 at [5]; and Dymocks Franchise Systems (NSW) Pty Ltd v Bilgola Enterprises Ltd (1999) 13 PRNZ 48 (...

10. Auckland Standards Committee v Davidson [2013] NZLCDT 14 [pdf, 69 KB]

    ...of references from leaders of the community. This included leaders of the Judiciary, the Bar, the church and business, as well as from those persons in charitable organisations to which Mr Davidson has devoted an enormous amount of his time and resources. [13] We accept the submission that the practitioner “... has given a lifetime of service to the legal profession both in terms of his practise and in the governance of the profession”. His counsel points out that his charit...