LCRO 53/2020 YJ v GK (22 April 2021) [pdf, 280 KB]
...application would have made Mr DQ’s application more attractive to the bank. [112] Related to this complaint, is Mr YJ’s allegation that Mr GK knew Mr DQ was incurring additional liability to the bank which therefore reduced Mr DQ’s own financial resources, and this had the effect of increasing Mr YJ’s exposure to the bank by being called upon to meet a greater share of ABCD’s borrowing should there be a default. [113] Mr YJ alleges therefore, that Mr GK has breached his...