• If you are looking for a specific decision with a forward slash in the title (eg, 123/2014), you will need to replace the forward slash with a space (eg, 123 2014), as the website cannot pick up on forward slashes (/) or any other characters.
  • If you are doing a keyword search (eg, sanction), please note that this search will only produce decisions where the keyword appears in the title or decision description. If you want to search the entire decision document for certain keywords, you will need to use full website search located in the top right hand corner of this page.

  • If you want to search for a specific section of the Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007 or clause of the Code of Conduct 2014, you must search it as one word with no spaces or brackets. For example, if searching for section 44(2)(a) of the Act, you should enter ‘s442a’ into the keyword search and if searching for clause 19(k) of the Code of Conduct, you should enter ‘cl19k’.

If you want to search for a decision from a particular jurisdiction using the full website search, put both the jurisdiction name and the keyword in the search field (eg, Immigration Advisors Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal sanction).

Search results

851 items matching your search terms

  1. [2026] NZIACDT 30 - XA v Huang (7 May 2026) [PDF, 252 KB]

    Professional responsibilities and professional practice / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s442 / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1, cl5, cl6, cl17b, cl18b, cl19l, cl20a / HELD / adviser failed to send draft application to client before filing / breach of cl1 / did not proactively explain summary of professional obligations or significant matters in agreement / breach of cl17b, cl18b / conflict of interest / had contractual relationship with employer without disclosing conflict in writing, recording in agreement, and obtaining written consent / breach of cl5, cl6, cl19l / failed to charge reasonable fee / $12,000 fee for work visa, unfair and unreasonable / fees charged by offshore labour recruitment firms not relevant / cannot justify uplift on basis of extra work / no-win, no-fee model cannot justify steep elevation / breach of cl20a / complaint upheld / sanctions to follow
  2. [2026] NZIACDT 29 – NM v Liu (1 May 2026) [PDF, 120 KB]

    Professional responsibilities and professional practice / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s442 / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1, cl2a, cl3a, cl8a, cl13a, cl13c, cl18a, cl22, cl24c, cl26e, cl29a / failure to engage with Authority and Tribunal / adviser engaged by employer and some of its employees to conduct job checks and assist with visa applications / continued to advise employer and an employee without required supervision under provisional license, amounting to deceptive misrepresentation of licence status / failed to provide client files to Authority upon request / failed to provide employer written services agreement / provided invoices to employer without particularising services rendered / failed to inform employer of suspension and offer refund for uncompleted services / failed to maintain relationship of confidence and trust with employer / complaint upheld / sanctions to follow
  3. [2026] NZIACDT 27 – AM v Huang (23 April 2026) [PDF, 201 KB]

    Sanctions / adviser failed to disclose and obtain written consent to a conflict of interest and charged excessive fee / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s3, s50, s51 / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1, cl4(a), cl5, cl6, cl17b, cl19l and cl20a / adviser found to be in breach of seven professional obligations / undisclosed conflict and excessive fee identified as most serious / fee of approximately $15,400 deemed grossly excessive / fee reflected a lack of appreciation of setting a reasonable fee in New Zealand market / conflict of interest did not provide undisclosed financial advantage to adviser and had no detriment to client / adviser’s second appearance / reputational damage from earlier decision and related proceedings not significant factor in context of adviser’s retirement before publication / adviser censured and fined $4,000 (having considered totality of sanctions in parallel proceeding)
  4. [2026] NZIACDT 26 – INZ (Watson) v Huang (14 April 2026) [PDF, 105 KB]

    Sanctions / adviser failed to disclose and obtain written consent to a conflict of interest and charged excessive fee / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s3, s50, s51 / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1, cl4(a), cl5, cl6, cl17b, cl18b, cl19l and cl20a / adviser found to be in breach of eight professional standards / undisclosed conflict and excessive fee identified as moderately serious / fee of approximately $14,000 deemed grossly excessive / fee reflected a lack of appreciation of setting a reasonable fee in New Zealand market / conflict of interest did not provide undisclosed financial advantage to adviser and had no detriment to client / adviser’s first appearance / reputational damage from earlier decision not significant factor in context of adviser’s retirement before publication / adviser censured and fined $3,000
  5. [2026] NZIACDT 25 – ID v Yu (13 April 2026) [PDF, 131 KB]

    Sanctions / adviser dishonestly concealed failure to lodge residence visa application and fabricated existence of ‘missing’ interim visa / inaction resulted in complainant’s immigration status becoming unlawful / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s3, s50, s51 / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1, cl2e, cl8a, cl8c, cl13a, cl13c, cl14, cl15a, cl17a, cl17b, cl17c, cl18b, cl19c, cl19m, cl19n, cl26e / adviser found to be dishonest and in breach of 16 professional standards / medium to high gravity of wrongdoing / adviser’s failure to lodge resident visa application significantly impacted complainant / misconduct aggravated by poor disciplinary record / Tribunal recently upheld seven complaints, with dishonesty involved in six complaints / further order preventing reapplication of licence proportional to adviser’s wrongdoing / adviser censured and fined $3,000 (reduced from $8,000 to reflect totality of parallel proceedings) / adviser ordered to pay complainant $8,160 in compensation  
  6. [2026] NZIACDT 24 – ZM v Yu (7 April 2026) [PDF, 104 KB]

    Sanctions / adviser failed to provide written services agreement for subsequent work visa application /  failed to inform client upon her licence being suspended / client later discovered no subsequent application had been made / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s3, s50, s51 / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1, cl3a, cl8a, cl8c, cl13a, cl13c, c14, cl18a, cl22, cl24c, cl26e, cl29a / adviser found to be in breach of 12 professional standards / most serious breaches were lack of services agreement and adviser’s continued, albeit inadequate, representation of client following suspension / misconduct aggravated by failure to engage with Authority and Tribunal, alongside disciplinary history comprising 95 breaches of the Code across seven complaints, with dishonesty involved in six complaints / adviser censured, fined $2,500 (reflecting totality of parallel proceedings), and ordered to refund fee of $1,540 to client  
  7. [2026] NZIACDT 23 - RZ v Yu (30 March 2026) [PDF, 228 KB]

    Sanctions / adviser dishonestly concealed failure to reply to INZ’s requests for information in response to work visa variation application / forged complainant’s signature in subsequent application / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s3, s50, s51 / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1, cl2e, cl8a, cl8c, cl13a, cl13c, cl14, cl15a, cl17a, cl17b, cl17c, cl18b, cl19c, cl19m, cl19n, cl24a, cl24c, cl26b, cl26e / dishonesty and breach of 19 professional standards / gravity of misconduct at upper end of serious, notable forging of complainant’s signature / seven separate complaints upheld against adviser, six involving dishonesty / adviser's belated contention that she did not intend to mislead complainant or conceal information dismissed / insincere acceptance of seriousness of disciplinary findings / further order preventing reapplication of licence proportional to adviser’s wrongdoing / adviser censured and fined $4,000 (reduced from $8,000 to reflect totality of parallel proceedings)
  8. [2026] NZIACDT 22 - EG v Yu (30 March 2026) [PDF, 223 KB]

    Sanctions / adviser dishonestly informed complainant that visa application had been made and was under assessment by INZ / dishonestly advised complainant that interim visa had been issued and she was not overstaying / filed s 61 request for discretionary visa without instructions / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s3, s50, s51 / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1, cl2e, cl8a, cl8c, cl13a, cl14, cl17a, cl17b, cl17c, cl18b, cl22, cl26e / adviser found to be dishonest and in breach of 12 professional standards / gravity of adviser’s misconduct assessed as medium to high level / seven separate complaints upheld against adviser, six involving dishonesty / adviser’s belated explanation of personal events and health issues accepted to impact advisory capabilities but do not explain or justify lying to complainant / accepted advisor was provisionally licensed at time of misconduct / further order preventing reapplication of licence proportional to adviser’s wrongdoing and in public interest / …
  9. [2026] NZIACDT 21 – SM v Yu (24 March 2026) [PDF, 113 KB]

    Sanctions / adviser dishonestly advised clients that application for visas had been filed and that grant of visas was imminent / adviser filed application five days later / adviser dishonestly withheld draft application and INZ’s letters to conceal misleading conduct / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s3, s50, s51 / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1, cl2a, cl2e, cl8a, cl8c, cl13a, cl14, cl15a, cl17a, cl17b, cl17c, cl18b, cl19c, cl19m, cl19n, cl22, cl26e / adviser was dishonest in two respects and breached 17 professional standards / gravity of  wrongdoing assessed as medium to high / dishonesty inherently serious, though comparatively less so than in adviser’s parallel proceedings / adviser’s belated explanation of personal events and health issues accepted to materially impact work but do not justify blatant lie to complainant and actions to conceal that misrepresentation / complaint does not require further order preventing reapplication for licence / adviser censured and fined $4,00…
  10. [2026] NZIACDT 20 – QX v Yu (23 March 2026) [PDF, 124 KB]

    Sanctions / adviser dishonestly filed application on behalf of client for tourism or holiday visa rather than work visa sought by client / subsequently provided client a fabricated work visa decline letter from INZ / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s3, s50, s51 / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1, cl2a, cl2e, cl8a, cl8c, cl13a, cl14, cl18a, cl22, cl26a, cl26b, cl26d / adviser dishonest in two respects and breached 12 professional standards / gravity of adviser’s wrongdoing at upper end of serious given dishonest / conduct aggravated by adviser’s failure to engage with Authority and Tribunal over prolonged period / adviser’s explanation of conduct did not acknowledge dishonesty finding nor apologise to complainant / four other dishonesty complaints upheld / further order preventing reapplication of licence proportional to adviser’s wrongdoing and in public interest / adviser censured and fined $4,000 (reduced from $8,000 to reflect totality of six parallel proceedings)
  11. [2026] NZIACDT 19 - KZ v Ma (16 March 2026) [PDF, 234 KB]

    Professional responsibilities and professional practice / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s442 / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1, cl2a, cl8a, c9, c18a, cl20b, cl22, cl26ai, c26e / adviser made series of futile and unsuccessful immigration applications / complainant had arrived to NZ long ago using relative’s passport / since married NZ resident, fathered children, and operated successful business / service agreement only pertained to initial s 61 request / adviser failed to provide written agreements for second s 61 request and Ministerial intervention request / second s 61 request filed without any new information, refugee claim withdrawn within days / failed to advise complainant of futility of applications / failed to work within scope of knowledge and experience / advised complainant his situation was outside her ability / charged $800 for two subsequent hopeless applications / failed to provide invoices / failed to provide Authority with client file / sanctions to follow
  12. [2026] NZIACDT 18 - ZX v Yu (13 March 2026) [PDF, 233 KB]

    Sanctions / adviser dishonestly offered residency-qualifying job in exchange for substantial payment, breaching seven professional standards / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s3, s50, s51 / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1, cl8a, cl8c, cl13a, cl14, cl18a, cl26e / gravity of adviser’s misconduct at upper end of serious / adviser’s actions, involving creation of fake job, amounted to immigration scam / such conduct compromises the integrity of the immigration system and undermines public trust / conduct aggravated by adviser’s failure to engage with Authority and Tribunal over prolonged period / expression of remorse belated and assessed in context of deliberate fraud / cancellation, a sanction of last resort, proportional to adviser’s wrongdoing and in public interest / adviser’s licence cancelled / prohibited from reapplying for licence for maximum period of two years / fined $4,000 (reduced from $8,000 to reflect totality of five parallel proceedings)
  13. [2026] NZIACDT 17 – GX v Huang (13 March 2026) [PDF, 243 KB]

    Professional responsibilities and professional practice / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s 442 / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1, cl5, cl6, cl14, cl17b, cl18b, cl19i / HELD / adviser failed to send draft application to client before filing / breach of cl1 / failed to provide evidence of being licensed / providing licence number not sufficient / breach of cl14 / failed to explain summary of professional obligations or significant matters in agreement / breach of cl17b & cl18b / paying commission to agent without disclosing conflict in writing, recording in agreement, and obtaining written consent, breach of cl5 & cl6 & cl19i / failed to charge reasonable fee / uplift for ‘no fee, no win’ model could not justify extravagant fee of $16,000 for two work visa and one student visa applications / breach of cl20a / sanctions to follow 
  14. [2026] NZIACDT 16 - NN v Registrar of Immigration Advisers (10 March 2026) [PDF, 74 KB]

    Appeal against Registrar rejecting complaint / immigration lawyer alleged adviser used copyrighted materials from third party organisations in contractual terms and conditions and various professional practice documents published on his website / Registrar rejected complaint under s 45 as there was no evidence of potential copyright infringement / Authority did not believe it nor Tribunal were correct organisations to make determinations as to copyright infringement / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s45, s442 / potential breaches of copyrighted materials without consent do not fall within statutory definition of immigration advice / no client nor immigration matter / matters fall outside statutory complaint and disciplinary process / matters may be investigated as part of considering fitness of person for licensing albeit not be subject of complaint / immaterial that copyright holders have not complained or commenced proceedings in other fora / appeal rejected
  15. [2026] NZIACDT 15 - XI v Shi & Sun (6 March 2026) [PDF, 234 KB]

    Sanctions / adviser found liable for four breaches of professional standards, including rubber stamping and charging excessive fees / supervisor found liable for one breach for failure to exercise due care and diligence in allowing extravagant fee / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s3, s50, s51 / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1, cl2e, cl12c, cl17b, cl17c, cl18b, cl20a / direct engagement a fundamental obligation of advisers / excessive fee was approximately twice the upper end of market rate / adviser’s gravity of wrongdoing moderate / supervisor’s gravity of wrongdoing regarding excessive fee at upper end of low / neither adviser nor supervisor acknowledged wrongdoing, nor offered apology or indicated remorse / no evidence of improved practices / adviser gave untruthful evidence at hearing / first disciplinary findings / adviser was inexperienced and provisionally licensed / adviser censured, required to undergo training, and fined $4,000 / supervisor cautioned and fined $1,500
  16. [2026] NZIACDT 14 - AM v Huang (3 March 2026) [PDF, 241 KB]

    Professional responsibilities and professional practice / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s442 / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1, cl4(a), cl5, cl6, cl17b, cl19l and cl20a / adviser failed to send draft application to client before filing with INZ / relied on recruitment company to review application with client / failed to obtain written authority from client to disclose personal information to recruiting company / assurance from third party that it has authority from client insufficient / failed to explain professional obligations and significant matters in agreement / failed to disclose conflict of interest / tripartite agreement with recruitment company created potential conflict which required disclosure and client’s written consent / adviser’s fees excessive / application was uncomplicated and did not warrant fee significantly beyond market range / ‘no win, no fee’ model lawful but did not justify steep elevation in fee / exploitive fee / complaint upheld / sanctions to follow
  17. [2026] NZIACDT 13 - INZ (Watson) v Huang (26 February 2026) [PDF, 270 KB]

    Professional responsibilities and professional practice / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s442 / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1, cl4(a), cl5, cl6, cl17b, cl18b, cl19l and cl20a / adviser failed to send draft application to client before filing with INZ / relied on recruitment company to review application with client / failed to obtain written authority from client to disclose personal information to recruiting  company / assurance from third party that it has authority from client insufficient / failed to explain professional obligations and significant matters in agreement / failed to disclose conflict of interest / tripartite agreement with recruitment company created potential conflict which required disclosure and client’s written consent / adviser’s fees excessive / applications were uncomplicated and did not warrant fee significantly beyond market range / ‘no win, no fee’ model lawful but did not justify steep elevation in fee / complaint upheld / sanctions to follow
  18. [2026] NZIACDT 12 – TS v Registrar of Immigration Advisers (23 February 2026) [PDF, 201 KB]

    Appeal against Registrar rejecting complaint / complaint adviser misled appellant by stating he was eligible for NZ job market, overestimating eligibility for resident visa / complaint adviser deceived him into believing that being “eligible” for resident visa  would enable him to secure employment / complaint adviser did not provide clear, documented advice about limits of eligibility / complaint regarding job search dismissed as undertaken by a different person in a different company under a separate contract / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s45, s442 / appellant misunderstood advice provided by adviser / adviser did not communicate he was entitled to such visa / adviser explained that further steps would “enhance” eligibility / rejection from employers due to lack of work visa is a reflection of job market / regulatory breaches discovered did not justify disciplinary action / appeal rejected
  19. [2026] NZIACDT 11 - ZQ v Zhuang (20 February 2026) [PDF, 101 KB]

    Sanctions / adviser terminated engagement after undertaking considerable work in respect of applications for complainant and her family / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s442 / Code of Conduct 2014, cl17b, cl18b, cl28c / three breaches of Code / adviser’s first appearance before Tribunal / low overall gravity of wrongdoing / adviser accepted disciplinary findings and has since introduced improvements in practice / adviser cautioned and fined $500
  20. [2026] NZIACDT 10 - ZM v Yu (18 February 2026) [PDF, 235 KB]

    Professional responsibilities and professional practice / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s442 / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1, cl3a, cl8a, cl8c, cl13a, cl13c, c14, cl18a, cl22, cl24c, cl26e, cl29a / failure to engage with Authority and Tribunal / adviser failed to provide client evidence of being licensed / failed to provide written services agreement / failed to provide invoice / failed to act under direct supervision of supervisor under conditions of provisional licence / failed to inform client of being provisionally licensed / failed to inform client when her licence was suspended and provide a refund / failed to provide Authority client file / complaint upheld / sanctions to follow.
  21. [2026] NZIACDT 09 – ID v Yu (16 February 2026) [PDF, 260 KB]

    Professional responsibilities and professional practice / dishonesty / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s442 / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1, cl2e, cl8a, cl8c, cl13a, cl13c, cl14, cl15a, cl17a, cl17b, cl17c, cl18b, cl19c, cl19m, cl19n, cl26e / adviser dishonestly concealed failure to lodge residence visa application and fabricated existence of ‘missing’ interim visa / declined to engage with Authority and Tribunal / failed to carry out complainant’ instructions / failed to explain significant matters in services agreement / failed to provide and explain summary of professional obligations and complaints procedure / failed to act under direct supervision of supervisor under conditions of provisional licence / failed to inform client of being provisionally licensed and provide evidence of licence / failed to provide Authority with client file / complaint partially upheld / sanctions to follow
  22. [2026] NZIACDT 08 - EG v Yu (12 February 2026) [PDF, 251 KB]

    Professional responsibilities and professional practice / dishonesty / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s442 / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1, cl2e, cl8a, cl8c, cl13a, cl14, cl17a, cl17b, cl17c, cl18b, cl22, cl26e / adviser dishonestly informed complainant a visa application had been made and was under assessment by INZ / dishonestly advised complainant that interim visa had been issued and she was not overstaying / filed s 61 request for discretionary visa without instructions / falsely informed complainant only agent could contact INZ regarding application / failed to carry out and acted contrary to complainant’s instructions / failed to explain significant matters in agreement, professional responsibilities owed and complaints procedure / failed to act under direct supervision of supervisor under conditions of provisional licence / failed to inform client of being provisionally licensed and provide evidence of licence / complaint upheld / sanctions to follow
  23. [2026] NZIACDT 07 – RZ v Yu (10 February 2026) [PDF, 270 KB]

    Professional responsibilities and professional practice / dishonesty / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s442 / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1, cl2e, cl8a, cl8c, cl13a, cl13c, cl14, cl15a, cl17a, cl17b, cl17c, cl18b, cl19c, cl19m, cl19n, cl24a, cl24c, cl26b, cl26e / adviser dishonestly concealed failure to reply to INZ’s requests for information in response to work visa variation application / concealed decline of initial variation application / lodged second variation application without informing complainant, forging complainant’s signature in attempt to conceal earlier failures to respond to INZ / declined to engage with Authority and Tribunal / failed to send applications for complainant’s review prior to filing / no written service agreement / failed to act under direct supervision of supervisor under conditions of provisional licence / failed to inform client of being provisionally licensed and provide evidence of licence / complaint upheld / sanctions to follow
  24. [2026] NZIACDT 06 – SM v Yu (10 February 2026) [PDF, 262 KB]

    Professional responsibilities and professional practice / dishonesty / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s442 / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1, cl2a, cl2e, cl8a, cl8c, cl13a, cl14, cl15a, cl17a, cl17b, cl17c, cl18b, cl19c, cl19m, cl19n, cl22, cl26e / adviser dishonestly advised clients that application for visas had been filed and that grant of visas was imminent / adviser filed application five days later / adviser dishonestly withheld draft application and INZ’s letters to conceal misleading conduct / failed to obtain clients’ instructions / declined to engage with Authority and Tribunal / provided no written service agreement / failed to act under direct supervision of supervisor under conditions of provisional licence / failed to inform client of being provisionally licensed and provide evidence of licence / failed to respond to INZ’s correspondence seeking information about clients / complaint upheld / sanctions to follow
  25. [2026] NZIACDT 05 - QX v Yu (03 February 2026) [PDF, 274 KB]

    Professional responsibilities and professional practice / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s442 / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1, cl2a, cl2e, cl8a, cl8c, cl13a, cl14, cl18a, cl22, cl26a, cl26b, cl26d / adviser dishonestly filed application on behalf of client for tourism or holiday visa rather than work visa sought by client / subsequently provided client a fabricated work visa decline letter from INZ / failed to provide client draft visa application for review / failed to respond to INZ’s request for further information, resulting in declined application / failed to act under direct supervision of supervisor under conditions of provisional licence / failed to inform complainant of being provisionally licensed and provide evidence of licence / failed to provide services agreement / failed to obtain and carry out client’s instructions, provide timely updates, and provide invoice / failed to maintain well-managed filing system / complaint partially upheld / sanctions to follow